Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 267 Next
1  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Flex-5000 Discontinued on: Today at 06:01:54 AM
Every rig and  every brand out there has it's share of complaints against it and has detractors. All have faults. I have yet to find a perfect radio and I doubt one exist nor will it ever exist.  You show your ignorance by claiming that any off the shelf case could be used. Changing cases would not only involve re engineering but most important of all, it would require a new round of testing for type acceptance which isn't cheap.  

Well Flex has more complaints than the big three combined. As far as ignorance there is nothing hi-tech about that case that it could not be easily dupped or subbed. Kenwood and Yaesu saw a massive loss of parts sources with Tsunami and many suppliers gone for good and you did not see them discontinue any rigs because of it.

Flex is trying to play with big boys and act like a high roller when they are far from it. They are real good at excuses and BS though. The had a lot a practice with 5000.
And you know they have more complaints how? Someone elect you to keep track of it? I have seen complaints left and right about certain Icom radios failing. I loved my Kenwood TS-2000X I once owned but the dang thing had a birdie right in the middle of a popular satellite downlink.  The Yaesu 450 I owned had issues with ergonomics like too small of a tuning knob etc. etc. I worked in the retail end of the ham radio business. I've seen complaints about every type of radio out there. And yes, you are being ignorant! If nothing else changing the case would involve paying a lab to do type acceptance test again because of RF shielding considerations and such. You seem to want to  ignore that part of the money equation. Those test aren't cheap by any means. The big three afford such things for small radio upgrades by separating people like you from thousands of dollars for mediocre radios with substandard RX's.  A 600 dollar Flex 1500 RX beats radios out there that cost a couple of thousand easy. I know, I've compared them. Get over yourself, the Japanese manufacturers are laughing at you all the way to the bank!
Michael, W4HIJ

A quick web search will find LOTS of complaints on Flex radios. Software and RFI. Likely most RFI prone rig out there. Flex's biggest mistake was being to department on a external computer of unknown standards and a weak link by design.
2  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Antenna cleaner on: Yesterday at 09:01:43 PM
I can see cleaning connection but polishing antenna otherwise is self defeating. The oxide coating protects and limits further surface oxidation. Remove it and it starts all over again.
3  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Flex-5000 Discontinued on: Yesterday at 07:53:58 PM
Every rig and  every brand out there has it's share of complaints against it and has detractors. All have faults. I have yet to find a perfect radio and I doubt one exist nor will it ever exist.  You show your ignorance by claiming that any off the shelf case could be used. Changing cases would not only involve re engineering but most important of all, it would require a new round of testing for type acceptance which isn't cheap. 

Well Flex has more complaints than the big three combined. As far as ignorance there is nothing hi-tech about that case that it could not be easily dupped or subbed. Kenwood and Yaesu saw a massive loss of parts sources with Tsunami and many suppliers gone for good and you did not see them discontinue any rigs because of it.

Flex is trying to play with big boys and act like a high roller when they are far from it. They are real good at excuses and BS though. The had a lot a practice with 5000.
4  eHam Forums / Misc / RE: Kenwood News on: Yesterday at 07:38:38 PM
The dual band rig should be out soon. No time line on others yet.
5  eHam Forums / Misc / RE: WARNING: Lithium Polymer Batteries fire on: Yesterday at 06:16:29 PM
Only about 10 cycles on that battery.  It was really funny to watch, though!  I literally stopped traffic, spraying the poor thing down with a fire extinguisher in the middle of the street.

How many cycles that day?
6  eHam Forums / Misc / Kenwood News on: Yesterday at 06:11:16 PM
The latest gossip I got from Kenwood at Hamvention is that they have some more rigs in pipeline. The 990 is selling very well and Kenwood wants even more of the pie. There is "talk" of a new 800 series rig, a new dual band mobile with built in GPS and a possible TS-2000 replacement.
7  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Flex-5000 Discontinued on: Yesterday at 05:59:59 PM
My understanding from the Dayton interview I just watched is that they didn't have a lot of options as far as continuing to manufacture the 5K. The vendor they got the cases from was discontinuing that type of work and getting replacements/retooling would have driven the price of the 5K up closer to that of a 6500. Especially a 5K with a 2nd RX option. Good radios get discontinued all the time because of parts sources drying up. 

You believe everything Flex says when their claim and timelines are seldom true. Case is a poor excuse as they could of used another off shelf case and called it a 5100. As far as parts it is not that old. I would not say it was a good radio either because as many or more people hated them than loved them. I would like to see a rig with same amount of complaints. None come remotely close. 
8  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Flex-5000 Discontinued on: Yesterday at 01:23:11 PM
The first Flex-5000s were shipped in August 2007. That seems like a pretty good run for an innovative radio. In terms of hardware, 5000s are very durable. Flex repair service is excellent.
 

I find this in error as it has always been a problem child and RFI sensitive. Also software always was its weakness. Flex never got it right and are giving up. Given how unresponsive they were to some software problems when it was still being sold it will only get worse now.
9  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Flex-5000 Discontinued on: Yesterday at 11:30:32 AM
Expect to see a flood of used Flex5Ks on the market, in addition to the ones already being sold because of the F6k, due to Flex discontinuing to manufacture the F5K.

-robert

Will that's one way to fix its troubled history.
10  eHam Forums / Computers And Software / RE: Your thoughts on Ham Radio Deluxe 6.xx on: May 17, 2013, 08:18:38 PM
JX and MJR.  The OP was looking for opinions on HRD.  If you have one, kindly offer it.  No reason to attack MY opinion.  I was not addressing either of you!

The poster asked for opinion on upgrade which I gave. To require a user to purchase a expansive upgrade for just a simple URL fix is bad. Yearly fees are not good either. It sounds like someone is trying to mine HRD users wallets as much as possible and hopping after they sink hundreds into it they will keep doing it because they have so much invested. Called marketing 101
11  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Heathkit SB 200 questions on: May 17, 2013, 08:14:44 AM
I am using the internal metering. I was under the impression that the Harbach power supply upgrade also replaces the meter resistor string, so that should be new. Am I not correct on that assumption?

I am not sure as I have never done that mod myself but regardless you want a independent reading first and also monitor line voltage on xmit.
12  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Heathkit SB 200 questions on: May 17, 2013, 08:01:50 AM
Did you actually measure the HV line with something like a high voltage probe or are you relying on the internal metering?


The internal metering using 4 resistors to pot down the voltage. If the value of these resistors has drifted then your reading will be inaccurate. The original carbon resistors have most likely changed value over the years. One of mine was open circuit and the other two had changed values. I replaced them all.

As always be mega careful working around HV. You won't get a second chance.



Mark N1UK

Very good advise.
13  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: A Brand New 100 Watt HF Transceiver For 400.00 ??? on: May 17, 2013, 07:14:51 AM
Nearly any HF rig can be "opened up" for CB.

How true indeed.
14  eHam Forums / Computers And Software / RE: Win 8 Tablet on: May 17, 2013, 07:13:19 AM
I have an iPad3 and it does not have 30-40 hours of use with a single charge. The best I have got is somewhere around 12 hours. 

Check this article out. Could be battery life will be changing in the future with the Haswell line of chips from Intel.

http://gizmodo.com/now-is-a-horrible-time-to-buy-a-laptop-496028699

CPU then Display are the two major power factors in energy consumption. Intel has been talking about Haswell for some time. The Atom line was born as a ultra low power CPU. Its traditional weakness it was placed in devices with little ram and lacked a out of order execution unit that choked it at times with poorly compiled code. Haswell Atoms will gain out of order support and 4 true cores with a focus on tablet and ultra life laptops.  If you need to by a laptop now you want a 3rd generation I3, I5 or I7 and if part number ends in a U like 3317U it is a low power CPU. Also the only difference between a I3 and I5 in a laptop is lack of turbo over clock boost on I3. Both are dual core with hyper thread and have four logical cores. I3 should have best battery life as it has no turbo overclock to increase CPU power usage.

I discovered a interesting tid bit. Intel was originally approached by Apple for a CPU for its Iphone and later Ipad and Intel turned them down and they then went to Samsung ARM processor. Intel was late getting into smartphone market but now are getting into it in a large way with latest Atom CPU's
15  eHam Forums / Computers And Software / RE: Your thoughts on Ham Radio Deluxe 6.xx on: May 17, 2013, 05:35:33 AM
I have to agree with W8JX on most of his responses except the part about them charging to fix 5.xx that part is yet to be seen!

I was referring to upgrading to 6x for the fix.

IMO they would have been much better off if they just offered fixes for at least 5 years or two complete revisions which ever comes first that would be kind of Like how Microsoft does it.

I agree this would be more the norm and as I said the LOTw issue could be fixed with a simple free patch.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 267 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!