|
|
|
1
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: Ohm's Law
|
on: May 11, 2013, 07:44:40 PM
|
I teach Ohm's Law as E=IR and that is what is on my Ohm's Law "T" Shirt so, no reason to change in my humble opinion. The important thing is that the shirt is changed; periodically anyway. 
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: FT-817
|
on: May 11, 2013, 07:39:14 PM
|
|
Tom, well you already know it's not at the Function key level because that power setting will apply to all bands. Concur with others to run it through a meter w/dummy load.
*IF* that doesn't isolate it, was the unit purchased used? If so, I'm curious from the 817 gurus if this would be exhibited if someone was playing in the hidden menus and when going past any of items 22, 40, or 52 they didn't accidentally bump the main dial (which is how settings are changed in there). Those relate to, respectively, VHF over-current protection, the high-power setting on VHF, and the TX gain on VHF.
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
eHam Forums / QRP / RE: WHEN IS QRP NOT QRP?
|
on: May 09, 2013, 12:27:33 PM
|
Something about pea-shooter rig power crossing salt-water....
72/73
 Brings back memories of an "accident." Back after getting my civ license all I had as an 817, Elecraft T-1 tuner, and some wire w/counterpoise thrown up into a tree. Then I got a THP 45w amp but was tuning up at 1/2 power one day not to hurt the T1 and forgot to kick in the THP. The result was a short but pleasant QSO with a straight-key to the Seychelles on 2.5w. I don't chase DX, I don't live & breathe QRP, but you can be darned sure that QSO is still remembered & at the top of the list. Continuing to balance the radio life with QRP (CW) has fostered alot of enrichment in researching antennas & propagation, which has enriched everything else. As Allison intimated, I'd rather put a small gel-cell & QRP radio in the ruck and haul more food & water, or just save my back. Grand-kids have an expression, something like "s'all good" 
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Bought a brand new Ameritron AL80B 1KW amplifier...
|
on: April 09, 2013, 11:22:47 AM
|
I feel much more confident now, but still a little nervous. One trip through with no expensive smoke, melting down or arcing, I'll have it down.  If you tell me you're still waiting, I'm not buyin' it. How did it go?  There was a similar thread quite a way back (among the bazillions contributed by WB2WIK Steve and many others) on this very amp. It took the modern version of the seemingly counter-intuitive current AL-80B manual & made it easy in 1 page. (The original manual with my '95 actually seems a bit more straightforward than the current one, maybe just me.) You got the benefit of that here. Dummy load? Heck, the first time I was so nervous I just ran along Steve's list with nothing on, keying down, twirling a knob, and reading to understand what I should be expecting. Then live into the dummy load with mental fingers x'd - much angst for nothing looking back. I personally don't run ALC, to each their own. And not ashamed to say I keep a little single page sheet on the desk for my (manual) tuner's settings on various bands and the plate & grid & output expected at a given drive. The amp was tuned to extract max (within Ig limits, less concerned with plate) and then drive reduced; taking that last bit of edge off the grid really helps counter splatter & yields smooth audio reports. Some bands require a bit of tweaking of the plate at reduced power, but easily done. The cheat-sheet is a reminder of where the "no damage zone" is. I hope you enjoy your AL-80B as much as I enjoy my '95 that is still truckin' along. You're gonna have some fun.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Amplifiers, tuve vs solid state, opinions please
|
on: March 06, 2013, 03:49:11 PM
|
I need to do the 10/12 meter mod and then there is a 15/17 meter mod too, plus from the instructions, looks like I will need a plastic hex (TV tuner) to adjust the input SWR. Thanks for everyone's help too.  I'd snagged the plastic tool from a fine old gent in town retiring from his TV repair biz. Un-needed; after mods had a fine input match anyway so what W7HBP said applies - check first. While you're popping for a more robust tuner, you will enjoy a dummy load that will handle 1.5kW or better if you don't have one already. Honest. Regarding WB2WIK Steve's fine advice, be sure & follow the guidance to tune it (hopefully using your dummy load) & eventually establish your plate & load settings at the highest drive setting you'll use on your transceiver. Don't be bashful about using a cheat sheet to jot stuff down when you're done. Then you can back your drive down & adjust overall output, vs. adjusting with 30w of drive and then deciding to crank the radio up to 60w. Amps don't like that. I've found my AL-80B to be very linear and (now 3rd owner) the old Eimac and that circuit are doing their typical Clydesdale-like job. Hope you're as happy with your -80B as I've been. Congratulations! 
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Your Favorite morse code keys !
|
on: February 12, 2013, 07:14:36 PM
|
A fully original, full o' brass, never bunged up, J-37. Prefer them over J-38's. Might be just me and the leaf spring on this particular J-37 is like stuff for mama bear, "just right." 
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Keeping a clean signal
|
on: February 10, 2013, 07:32:59 AM
|
I have owned it for about a week, and I have been playing around with tuning it into my dummy load.
Bless you. The steps WB2WIK describes are for the same reason as the recommendation you found at W8JI's website. After tuning, and adding a little more LOAD, you may find you'll sacrifice a small number of watts no one will notice. But your grid current peaks will go down; amp is happy & operators too because signal is clean. You can tune for the antenna (with the amp offline) at whatever power from the exciter gives you a true enough reading. Go to the dummy load to tune the amp. Then get on the air & enjoy. FWIW, I did the same thing using a dummy load & keeping a simple spreadsheet (along with tuner settings for the Palstar). Very repeatable and takes one of the legs out from under Murphy.  Have fun.
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: A Chinese Amp
|
on: January 14, 2013, 09:29:07 AM
|
Shucks, I'll have to check it out at home. The work firewall blocks access to that domain based on its phishing-scam history... maybe the identical post over at the 'other' forum will have some pictures up. 
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: ARB-704 / Tuner Port REALLY a safe alternative?
|
on: December 27, 2012, 10:29:04 AM
|
What amplifier are you using? The ARB704 is not needed with any modern amplifier than I am aware of.
The Amp is an Ameritron AL-80B.
Lyman KB1TJY FT-450D, AL-80B (with a 17-yo Eimac  ) and AT2K tuner here. No buffer, no issues, no unnecessary interconnections. - Amp tuned the way taught by W8JI and WB2WIK, settings for amp & tuner on a cheat sheet on the desk. (Thank you gentlemen for the grain from alot of old thread-chaff.) - Have the 450D Pnl/C.S. front-panel push-button programmed for SWR function which allows a quick 10w carrier to check whatever the AT2K's been set to w/amp in standby; takes less than a second. - AT2K switched to a direct output to which is connected a 1.5K dummy load. Amp on, verify output to dummy load so as not to bother the folks on a band. - Flip AT2K back to antenna selector; play radio. Takes longer to type than do. You have a great combo, it will serve you well. 
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
eHam Forums / Contesting / RE: Ham for a month, and I hate contesters already.
|
on: October 29, 2012, 01:04:50 PM
|
This Maritime net always puzzles me. It is mentioned here on eham, but I've never heard it. I've listened on 14.300... They aren't 24x7. There are several nets going on that frequency, depending upon time of day and geographic area that needs to be covered; MMSN is just one of them. And, can't recall the post, yes, all 3 IARU regions recognize that freq (apparently in theory vs. practice), along with others on other bands, as GCOA and request contesters give 2.5kHz either side. The agreements say 5kHz, plus/minus. All 3 band plans have that designated. None of this has any teeth of course. You can look at http://mmsn.org/iaru.htmlif it matters, or not. Any number of reasons you might not hear them, could be time of day, could be an NCS has his/her beam turned toward a vessel they hear & you don't, shucks, it's HF radio. Contesting & net operations & CW & digital & everything else are achievable with civility. Even these. 
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
eHam Forums / Contesting / RE: Ham for a month, and I hate contesters already.
|
on: October 28, 2012, 03:17:11 PM
|
I've been monitoring 14.300 and it's entertaining.
There's a bunch of people from the net are trying to reason and plead with DR1D, who is stomping the net 50 Hz down.
Most of these guys are not identifying. Some of the are saying that he's interfering with "emergency communications", which is not actually the case. So there's enough lid behavior to go around for everyone.
DR1D is just ignoring them all and continuing his run.
I bet if someone with a signal were to come on and tell DR1D that they'll file a complaint with the contest organizers, he'd move.
Well someone got his attention finally but he's arguing with them about the bandwidth needed by the net.
Such behavior by DR1D and many others this weekend around a frequency recognized by all 3 IARU regions will not change until the people with the rhetoric walk their own talk and disallow the contacts. Many were ON 14300 not just within a few hundred Hz (and less). It won't change. I see GILGSN's frustration to a certain point but he may not understand, for example, such things as routine Canadian SSB contacts in the US 40m CW area. This is nothing new; it's their band plan. Coming into the "house" of the contesters with a rant probably isn't going to accomplish much. Many such participating in the contest were completely dismissive of requests to QSY even when acknowledging the net control operator directly and MANY net relays attempted to engage politely with their callsign - some stations responded, many suddenly had auditory exclusion. Has nothing to do with a particular freq or not in this case. People were already in QSO (in this case a net) and the closer it gets to 2359Z the behavior amplifies (no pun). Thankfully, it will go away, the blood will be mopped up and the bodies will be counted. Now if one needs OJT in net operations in an intentionally hostile operating environment, working WWDX SSB on 14300 is just the ticket.  Happy trails. Try all to be considerate of each other. Nothing will change until certain bodies aren't counted. When that happens, people will stop collecting them.
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
eHam Forums / Contesting / RE: the number given after signal report in ssb contest how do i find my number?
|
on: October 28, 2012, 03:00:03 PM
|
thank you all very much i am in zone 04 l stumbled to the CQ contesting world zone map after opening a CQ e-mail about hurricane sandy and net at 14.325 and contesters to try not to interfer with hurricane net having a great time working the dx stations thanks all again KC9VYX  That was nice they mentioned that. Now if they (along with ARRL and other region organizers, et al) would only back up their rhetoric regarding GCOA frequencies acknowledged since 2005 by all 3 IARU regions... 
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
eHam Forums / Digital / RE: RIGblaster Advantage vs SignaLink USB
|
on: October 05, 2012, 02:48:58 AM
|
Just re-iterating what Gene has said - you will need to use AFSK with RTTY for certain on the FT897D.
Good luck es 73 - Rob (and rest of post)
Thanks for the insight Rob. Investigating this very situation & have been following. FT450D and 817ND when portable. After reading the manuals of the SL-USB & both radios, ordering the Signalink version with the 6-pin mini-DIN is almost like pressing the easy button.
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Are log books required by the FCC or is that just a tradition
|
on: September 29, 2012, 12:04:10 PM
|
a few reasons I can think of to keep a log: ....
One more. If you test a new antenna over a sufficient period of time and want to get a real feel for how it "plays" in the real world (real obstructions, real earth, etc.) get good signal reports, info about what the distant-end has for an antenna, and you can keep the bearing/distance. If you do a diligent review this can tell you much some things your 'model' may not.
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Noise, Noise, Noise!
|
on: September 27, 2012, 09:46:54 AM
|
Since an end fed antenna is the absolute worse choice for common mode current problems, that isn't much of a recommendation for the low noise characteristics of an OCF.
Didn't say an OCFD was inherently quiet, just that I'm happy with mine. As to the end-fed, well, it's fooled me then, or I'm lucky, or something. It is what it is. It hears really well, goes where I need, and critical sig/audio reports are glowing. [/hijack] 
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|