Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Is the KX3 all it's cracked up to be or fake? on: April 05, 2013, 02:10:13 PM
I'm not sure what power level RSGB's using, but the ARRL measured the KX3's IMD at around -95ish dBm (I don't have the exact number in front of me). Maybe I'm missing something, but that number seems fine to me.
Really?

I misunderstood what dBc was. Too little sleep and all.

That said, ARRL's numbers still seem okay to me. Of course, don't purchase a horrible amplifier, but most people don't get a rig like the KX3 just to plug it into an amplifier.
2  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Is the KX3 all it's cracked up to be or fake? on: April 05, 2013, 10:10:32 AM
I just read the  RSGB report of the KX3 and the radio got a glowing review. However as expected the transmitter IMD on the higher bands was a lousy -22Dbc.

I'm not sure what power level RSGB's using, but the ARRL measured the KX3's IMD at around -95ish dBm (I don't have the exact number in front of me). Maybe I'm missing something, but that number seems fine to me.
3  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Is the KX3 all it's cracked up to be or fake? on: February 14, 2013, 09:57:49 AM
I just sold my KX3. It certainly was an excellent QRP rig.  However since a person has to use a sound card to observe the panadapter it had all the problems associated with that.  Images were the worst issue for me, plus torroids, isolators on the cables, the purchase of an external sound card to see the wide bandwidth etc.  It reminded me of owning the SDR-1000 only worse.  At least Flex had recommended sound products that they knew would work properly...most of the time. 

But Elecraft doesn't toot that horn very loudly about the radio, they just provided the output as a feature.  It's marketed as a very nice QRP radio and it does that very nicely. 

Would something like the SignalLink work for that?
4  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: apartment life - low power low profile on: February 03, 2013, 09:01:41 PM
I bashed my head against the wall with my attic dipole setup for a while. Recently I purchased a Buddipole and got a long enough mast to put the center of the antenna at the roof level (I live on the 2nd floor of a two story building). As a vertical dipole/L shaped antenna it does far better than the attic antennas I've tried. Then again, anything outside will do far better than any indoor antenna.

Is it possible to temporarily put something outside while operating and disassemble it when done? That's currently what I'm doing and I haven't received any nastygrams from my condo association yet (YMMV though).

(Oh, I also pretty much only operate digital <= 30W, which helps avoid complaints.)
5  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Is the KX3 all it's cracked up to be or fake? on: February 01, 2013, 04:59:55 PM
The KX3 like the FT817 is a nice toy to own because its cheap and affordable.

The base model KX3 is at least $300 more new compared to the base FT-817ND, more if you have Elecraft build it for you.

Obviously if you use a decent antenna like dipoles your success rate improves, which is how  most people do their qrp operation.

Preaching to the choir?

While its nice owning a cutesy small radio, the real limitations  with these kinds of portable radios is their battery life. In this regard  the KX3 is klutz because it has poor battery charge management and poor  battery selection options.
WHo cares if you can fit a radio into a wristwatch if you cant operate it for longer than 5 minutes? This essential point is a forgotten by many designers of portable ham equipment.

KX3's current draw is as low as 150mA. 3000mAh NiMH batteries in the battery holder would give you a significant amount of operating time. You may have had a point if you were talking about the 817, though.

Its exactly the reason why I prefer my old AEG HF manpack radio. I can just about use it for  a whole day without worrying the batteries going flat. I can connect it to my car battery, plane battery or AC for charging. I carry spare battery module which gives me another  24 hours of operation.

With the KX3 battery module you can do the same thing.

Rechargeables are no fun either, most of the ones that you buy at discount stores are Chinese junk that fail after 3 or 4 charges if you are  lucky.

So buy better ones online? There is such a thing as false economy.

All this just equals huge hassles and major annoyance factors. It would have been easier if the KX3 had a build in  battery pack and smart charging system with the options of plugging in a Solar panel, 12 to 50 volt DC source  or a AC source  and all of  this in 1 box. These days with portable solar panels that have  built in MPPT regulators/chargers you could have been operating and charging the KX3.

Again, KX3 battery module.

Now if you add all these features to the KX3 or FT817 you hardly have a portable solution. You have mess of electronics laying in a big pile thats a nuisance to carry. You would need a pack mule to carry all the options and bits and piecse if you going for a serious trail walk. Now I can only imagine how the mess that you carry worsens when you carry a HF amp. I am not worried about receiver performance I am more worried about  my back from all the extra weight I will be carrying with all the required accessories to make the radio effective!

So don't carry an amp? There's a reason why this section is called QRP.
 
You dont have a portable solution if you cant operate  a radio for at  least 24 or 48 hours without being a near a recharge facility. When ham radio manufacturers start building a product like this they will get my money, in the meantime   I  will just continue with my homebrew/surplus junk that does the job in more effective manner like most QRP/portable operators. The KX3 is not  silver bullet miracle that solves  all the problems and limitations that confront real portable operators.. You cant rest your laurels on receiver performance only! In my world. a self contained  HF manpack is the ideal portable  HF setup, and 20 watts   is more than enough to make the whole exercise enjoyable.

So QRP isn't for you, and that's okay. To me, these all seem like non-issues.
6  eHam Forums / RFI / EMI / Cable modem RFI on: January 08, 2013, 09:52:32 PM
I have a Motorola SB6141 cable modem about 5 feet away from my Yaesu FT-450AT. Unfortunately, it seems to be contributing to about 2 S-units of noise on at least some of 40 meters when powered. I replaced the wall wart with a direct connection to the shack's 12V supply with no change, as well as placed snap-on ferrites on almost all of the wires coming out of it except for the coax feed. I'd put a choke on the coax feed too, but the modem's status page said that it was using 28MHz for uplink, so it's probably not a good idea.

Is there anything else I can do besides going without Internet while on the air? (My setup is already pretty marginal as is due to being HOA restricted in a condo, so I'd like to try to improve my S/N ratio as much as possible.) Also, would something like the ANC-4 help?

Thanks!
7  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Is the KX3 all it's cracked up to be or fake? on: January 07, 2013, 01:57:03 AM
Actually, I'm considering starting to do SOTA so this question is relevant to my interests. Smiley

At this point I'm leaning towards the KX3 + HT option. The FT-817ND doesn't have NOAA weather (and it looks like the coming 2M addon for the KX3 won't either), which would be extremely important in an inclement weather situation. Not to mention the lower current draw that the KX3 provides. The 817ND is cheaper though, at least without the extra options...

Anyway, like others have said, the decision really depends on your operating needs.
8  eHam Forums / Clubs / RE: Dissappointed with the hobby and clubs so far on: July 12, 2011, 12:59:43 AM
Although still very much in existence, two meter repeaters are showing signs of dying out.  Some frequency pairs are still under coordination but are unused with the machines off the air, simply because nobody uses them anymore.

I recently got back into amateur radio and it seems like around here, the repeaters have taken to having a lot of nets about various stuff. Here's a list that one club here has. The other major repeater in my area is the one that does Newsline every Sunday, and that seems to be all they do as far as I know (I've been busy trying to get my HF setup working to my satisfaction in my condo, so I haven't been listening to the repeaters much).

IMO, I don't think 2 meter repeaters will completely die out because of their usefulness in emergency situations, but they're going to have to add value in other ways to stick around. There'll be a lot fewer, but much stronger too.
9  eHam Forums / Clubs / RE: HF Nets on: July 11, 2011, 06:21:53 PM
More than likely if the correct amount of NETS actually post it would surprise me how one NET or the other will over lap in frequency or be within 1-2 KHz. Leaving very little room for casual CQ QSO.

Isn't a net technically defined as a conversation with more than two hams anyway? Maybe if the focus is narrowed to larger nets, the list would be more helpful. Smiley
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!