|
|
|
76
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: New HF rig for a new Ham
|
on: May 12, 2012, 05:55:43 AM
|
|
Think antenna, not radio. In my opinion, far too many new HF hams buy a great transceiver and then string up a poor antenna. A $400 used rig with a good, tower-mounted Yagi will bring you lots more interesting operating possibilities than a $2,000 radio with a poorly-located dipole or vertical.
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
eHam Forums / Licensing / RE: How About A New Entry-Level License Class?
|
on: May 01, 2012, 10:00:18 AM
|
|
By the time I upgraded from Novice (after about eight months) to General in the mid-1960s, I had:
Built a Heathkit DX60/HR10/Twoer/SWR Bridge/Wattmeter station. Constructed an HF vertical, a 2M vertical and several HF dipoles. Made over 500 HF CW QSOs. Worked 48 states and about 35 countries. Made daily contact on our town's 2M AM Novice net. Thoroughly read every ham magazine I could get my hands on. Read chapters of the Handbook and other ARRL publications. Nearly memorized the ARRL License Manual Participated in several contests, including the NR, Field Day, etc.
I felt that the day I passed the General before an FCC examiner in New York, while a junior in High School, was one of the great days of my life. Don't think that many get that feeling anymore.
Neil/N3DF/Miami
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: K1MAN loses part of the court case
|
on: January 13, 2012, 10:07:27 AM
|
|
He didn't "win" anything. The court just decided that the "pecuniary interest" charge presents an issue to be decided at trial, while the "failure to respond" issues don't depend upon any facts in question and entitle the government to its claims without need for a trial (i.e., via summary judgment).
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
eHam Forums / Licensing / RE: The Death of Ham Radio?
|
on: November 13, 2011, 07:06:08 AM
|
The code test speed changed from 10 to 13 wpm in 1936, five years before the USA entered WW2.
ARRL had petitioned the FCC to raise the CW exam speed from 10 to 12.5 wpm. One ARRL official later suggested that this was at the behest of traffic handlers, who felt amateur cw ability needed general improvement. The FCC thought the 12.5 wpm standard might add difficulty to exam grading and so raised it to 13 wpm.
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|