Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: Prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 31 Next
136  eHam Forums / Misc / Tentec Jupiter future? on: December 29, 2011, 07:04:02 PM
Does anyone know what the future of the tentec Jupiter iswww.tentec.com. will they drop it, and and come up with a new hardware design?
137  eHam Forums / Misc / RE: New HF Tranceiver vs Old HF Transceiver on: December 29, 2011, 06:56:50 PM
Well its just to bad for you, you should have went to www.tentec.com got you a Jupiter. Shocked
138  eHam Forums / Station Building / RE: Opinions on the Ten-Tec Jupiter? on: December 29, 2011, 06:48:18 PM
I ran a Jupiter for almost two years with no problems . I traded a Icom 746 for it and it most certainly outperformed it on HF .  The sound of side band coming out of the transceiver was excellent and I really enjoyed listening to it . I think it is a very nice transceiver and easy to use and I often got unsolicited reports of great transmit audio .  Very very nice in its price class .  John kb2huk
John, I wonder what in the future for the Jup, will tentec continue to offer software improvements for it, or just drop it as Apple would, and then come up with a new hardware design?
139  eHam Forums / Station Building / RE: TS-590S or IC-756PRO3. on: December 29, 2011, 06:36:23 PM
I own a TS-590 and it is a very good rig. No design problem. Still don't know what you mean after looking at eHam.

73, Peter - HB9PJT

I don't own a 590, because of the eham reviews, do check them out.
Just read the 590 reviews before you buy
140  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Building a Rig for Voice on: December 29, 2011, 06:12:28 PM
Wow, thanks to everyone for all the suggestions.  At the moment, I'm leaning towards the Ensemble RXTX from Softrock.  Seems to be the best bang for the buck and will give an opportunity to work with surface mount parts which should be interesting (and tedious, I'm sure).  I will be sure to let everyone know how it turns out.
You may pick up, some good info on this site, or their yahoo site. www.sdr-cube.com
141  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: KX1+? on: December 29, 2011, 06:07:26 PM
There is a 3 bander KX1 on EBay for $180, it was originally a Buy it now for $250...until someone started to bid on it. I think you might see more of these on E-bay as (I assume) some are selling these off in order to get the KX3. 
i wonder if the KX3, will cause or inspire ,major changes in the Ham market?
142  eHam Forums / Station Building / RE: TS-590S or IC-756PRO3. on: December 29, 2011, 11:13:00 AM
I don't own a 590, because of the eham reviews, do check them out.
143  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Analogue Radios becoming SDR Hybrid? on: December 29, 2011, 11:09:43 AM
Thanks for the link, wonder what's coming this time next year?
144  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Seeing the big picture with PowerSDR??? on: December 29, 2011, 11:05:51 AM
I thank we could have both, if Flex would just put a small display ,on the side of its flex 5000. This would offer you a smaller foot print when wanted . What I'm after is a stand alone integrated  All in one PC/SDR transceiver like this,www.sdr-cube.com you just buy after market options when wanted, large display and so on.
Hams have your say?
145  eHam Forums / Site Talk / RE: New ten meter Ham rig - Magnum 257HP on: December 29, 2011, 10:43:55 AM
"FCC APPROVED" for What???
If it is used for AMATEUR use, it should not require any such approvals.  If it were to be used on CB or other "COMMERCIAL" services, it would have to be "Type ACCEPTED" but not for use on HAM FREQUENCIES by HAM OPERATORS!

Gary - W5GNB

I think you will find it is leagel

Search "illegal CB" here:

http://search2.fcc.gov/search/index.htm?job=search&start=15&q=illegal%20cb%20&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_filetype=&site=fcc_all&as_occt=&num=15&ref=f

According to Section 95.603(c) of the Commission’s rules, a CB transmitter is a transmitter that operates or is intended to operate at a station authorized for the CB service. 47C.F.R. § 95.603(c). The Commission’s equipment authorization experts in the FCC Laboratory have determined that the transceivers listed herein and other similar models at issue here are intended for use on the CB frequencies as well as those in the amateur service because they have built-in capability to operate on CB frequencies. This capability can be readily activated by moving or removing a jumper plug, cutting or splicing a wire, plugging in a connector, or other simple means. Thus, all the transceivers listed herein and similar models fall within the definition of a CB transmitter. See 47C.F.R. § 95.603(c). A CB transmitter must be certificated by the FCC prior to marketing or importation. 47 C.F.R. §§ 95.603(c); 2.803.

Moreover, the dual use CB and amateur radios of the kind at issue here may not be certified under the Commission’s rules. Section 95.655(a) states: "….([CB] Transmitters with frequency capability for the Amateur Radio Services … will not be certificated.)" See also Amendment of Part 95, Subpart E, Technical Regulations in the Personal Radio Services Rules, FCC 88-256, 1888 WL 488084 (August 17, 1988). This clarification was added to explicitly foreclose the possibility of certification of dual use CB and amateur radios, see id, and thereby deter use by CB operators of frequencies allocated for amateur radio use.

In addition, the Commission’s equipment authorization experts have determined that these devices violate or appear to violate a number of the rules governing CB devices. For example, they may use emission types not permitted, or emit RF power at a level in excess of the levels permitted in the CB radio service. See 47 C.F.R. § 95.639.

In view of the foregoing, the following "10-meter" transceivers are not acceptable for importation or marketing into/within the United States. Importation and marketing of these units is illegal pursuant to Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Section 2.803 of the rules. Willful violations of the Rules and the Act may subject the violator to a monetary forfeiture of not more than $11,000 for each violation or each day of a continuing violation. The Commission continues to review this type of equipment, and additional makes and models may be added to this list in the future.

LIST OF TRANSCEIVERS ILLEGAL TO IMPORT OR MARKET

ALBRECHT - model: AE-497
COBRA - model: 200 GTL DX
CONNEX - models: 3300, 3300 HP, 3300HP-ZX, 3300 PLUS, CX-3800, 4300 HP, 4300 HP 300, 4400, 4400 HP, 4600 Turbo, 4800 DXL, 4800 HPE, Deer Hunter, General Lee, General Washington
DRAGON - model: SS-497
EAGLE - models: 2000 (same radio as the Saturn) and 5000 (same radio as the Saturn Turbo).
GALAXY - models: 33HML, 44V, 45MP, 48T, 55, 55V, 66V, 73V, 77, 77HML, 88HL, 93T, 95T, 99V, 2517, 2527, 2547, DX94HP, Melaka, Saturn and Saturn Turbo
GENERAL - General Jackson, Grant, Stonewall Jackson, Lee, Washington, A.P. Hill, Longstreet, Sherman
INTEK - model: Multicom-497
MAGNUM - models: 257, 357DX, Alpha force, Delta Force, Mini, Omega Force,S3, S3RF, S6, S9,
MIRAGE - models: 33HP, 44, 88, 99, 2950, 2950EX, 2970, 6600, 88H/L, 9900,
NORTH STAR - models: NS-3000 and NS-9000
PRESIDENT - models: Grant, J.F.K., Jackson, Lincoln, HR-2510 and HR-2600
PRO STAR - model: 240
RANGER / RCI - models: AR-3500, RCI-2900, RCI-2950, RCI-2950-DX, RCI-2970, RCI-2970-DX, RCI-2980-WX, RCI-2985-DX, RCI-2995-DX, RCI-6300, RCI-6300 Turbo, RCI-6300F-25, RCI-6300F-150, RCI-6900, RCI-6900 Turbo, RCI-6900F-25, RCI-6900F-150, RG-99, Voyage VR-9000
STRYKER - model: 440
SUPERSTAR - model: 121, 122, 36, 3700, 3900, 3900HP, 3900 American Spirit, 3900 HP G, 3900 Gold, 3900GHPA, 3900GHPM, 4800, Grant
TEK - model: HR-3950
UNIDEN - models: HR-2510 and HR-2600
VIRAGE - model: 3300, 3300 HP, VX-38, VX-39,

I think you will find it's not only legal to import your list of radios, but sale them as well( Per fed court court order ). The FCC can only get involved, when the radio it use illegally,
146  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: KX1+? on: December 29, 2011, 10:18:07 AM
Yes, at $215.00, that could work for me , but offer me one in green.
147  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: What do you want , in your QRP Radio of Tomorrow? on: December 29, 2011, 10:13:54 AM
I want it to be water proof with protective cover, have DPS, low power use, have build in tuner or manual tuner with tuning LED its case should be green or yellow and  Note: Tell me what I've left out or need to include?
148  eHam Forums / Youth / RE: Under utilized morse code programs for unlicensed amateur radio students. on: December 28, 2011, 03:54:23 PM
I think the only way to get new hams involved in CW , is to add a voice interface, just like PSK/31 operators some time use.
It would be Morse code sent, letting operators cope it by ear,keyboard or machine. Note: it seems that most PSX/31 operators are now using prearranged type messages for the entire QSO, very very dull ,and killing off its popularity.
149  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Analogue Radios becoming SDR Hybrid? on: December 28, 2011, 03:28:41 PM
SDRI more expensive? Er, take a look at the Baofeng UV-3R - its an SDR radio so cheap you dont care if you break it!
You have a link?
150  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Seeing the big picture with PowerSDR??? on: December 28, 2011, 03:26:53 PM
That advice ,could hurt someone's business plan?
Pages: Prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 31 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!