|
|
|
31
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: First HF Rig
|
on: February 10, 2012, 11:31:47 AM
|
If it was me (and it isn't  ), I wouldn't try to make one radio accomplish all the things that you are trying to do. For portable, battery powered operation, none of these radios really does that very well, even the FT-817D. The reason is that it pulls over 300 mA when it is just sitting squelched, which is quite a lot of current. There are some QRP radios available, such as the Wilderness Radio, Elecraft and Small Wonder Labs radios, that draw less than 30 mA when receiving; a factor-of-10 improvement. Then you could purchase your main station radio without having to make any compromises to accomodate portable operating, and use something totally different for your portable operations.
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Contesting redneck style
|
on: January 13, 2012, 10:15:27 AM
|
If I remember correctly red-necks were coal miners standing up to to the people who owned and operated mines without any regard for the lives of miners.
As I understand it, 'redneck' is a term that originated in Britain, although I believe it's no longer part of their vernacular. It was a disparaging term for Scottish Covenanters (read more about them on Wikipedia). The image conveyed then is similar to that in the States today; a truculent rural people. 73 Scott W5ESE
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
eHam Forums / Clubs / RE: What are some of your favorite presentations at club meetings?
|
on: January 04, 2012, 09:30:41 AM
|
|
I've been to a couple presentations about the Texas QSO Party, and I enjoyed watching those.
The ones that don't interest me are the ones that are not related to radio.
Some clubs get so desparate for topics that they have presentations on unrelated subjects; electric power plants, photography, astronomy, etc.
I'd prefer that a club either have a radio-related topic, or just have an informal gathering around a meal, and gab with others about what they're enjoying in the hobby.
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Ten tec Jupiter or Elecraft K2
|
on: December 08, 2011, 10:10:34 AM
|
Need to make decision, I prefer CW and Digital modes ! Need advice should I get the Jupiter or the K2  ? Have read about both radios but need advice which would you buy    ? Thanks KD8OTT I think they're very different radios. If you primarily value "raw radio" receiver performance (sensitivity, ip3 and blocking dynamic range, etc), you probably will go for the K2. If you more value the ability to control most aspects of the radio with software, the Jupiter would probably be a better fit. It would probably be more reasonable to compare the K2 with the Ten-Tec Omni series. 73 Scott W5ESE
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
eHam Forums / QRP / RE: 20 m or 40 m?
|
on: November 27, 2011, 10:34:24 AM
|
Thanks, everybody for the input.
I think I have made up my mind. I'm going to order the MFJ Cub in the 40 meter version now (my permanent antenna is a 40 meter dipole), and add the 20 meter version at some later date (I have a 1/4 wave 20 meter wire vertical for portable use, but probably won't be doing much portable operating now until spring anyway--we already have snow here in N. Utah).
73 and hope to see you on the air.
Garth, KF7ATL
I think you made the right choice. I occasionally take a QRP rig on backpacking trips, and find that 40m is a better fit for operating in the evenings, when I am in camp and have a little time to get on the air. If you haven't yet, look into the activities of the Adventure Radio Society 'Spartan Sprints', and also 'Summits on the Air' for activities to put your new radio to use. The 'Summits on the Air' activity is more likely to be on 20m, although I've made 40m contacts as a summit station, too. Don't know if they still do, but the ARRL had a package deal in which you could get a 40m Cub and the book 'Low Power Communications' for a pretty nice price. 73 Scott W5ESE
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Basic QRP...some say primitive...
|
on: November 27, 2011, 09:33:42 AM
|
Theres always talk about the high end stuff. Anyone using the primitive, crystal controlled stuff much? Seems after 40 years I get more of a kick out of running the Rockie off a battery working a guy a few hundred miles away. Even the YL, who has no interest in ham radio, will look at the board and be impressed...... 72 de WB0FDJ DOC
I have three Rockmites (3579.5, 7040 and 14060 KHz). I use them from time to time, primarily on camping trips. Something magic about using a minimal radio from my tent a few miles from the nearest road. You sound like a good candidate to dabble in QRP ARCI's 'Pet Rock Contest' (on January 7 2012). I've participated in it a couple of times, and had fun. You don't have to be a QRP ARCI member to participate. http://www.qrparci.org/content/view/8373/118/73 Scott W5ESE
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Age distribution of CW ops and CW Sweepstakes
|
on: November 26, 2011, 08:30:12 AM
|
|
I just put in a minor effort. Here is the distribution from my log:
[scottm@shingleHills 2011]$ ./analyzeSSLog < W5ESE.LOG 1920 1 1930 1940 4 1950 27 1960 35 1970 21 1980 6 1990 2 2000 3 2010 total: 99
Quite a bulge from the 1950's through the 1970's. Scott W5ESE
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Age distribution of CW ops and CW Sweepstakes
|
on: November 18, 2011, 10:37:15 AM
|
I remember the Spanish station EE5E in a DX contest just a few years ago, by far it was the most commonly busted call. To me it sounded like a bozo with a stuck or runaway keyer paddle.
Maybe he just likes the call, and it has nothing to do with contesting?  May come as a shocker to some of you guys, but there are some hams that don't live for contesting. I also like his Swedish cousin's call, 'SE5E'.  73 Scott
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: And you think the code is dead ? think again !
|
on: November 14, 2011, 09:49:14 AM
|
that's not a particularly random or well selected example if you're looking for relative quantities of operators.. It brings out a distinctly different population of operators than some random weekend day, for instance.
I disagree with this; Field Day is a well-selected example precisely because it draws out a large number of operators that do not regularly participate in contests, and so it is a much more accurate reflection of the hobby than the DX Contests, WPX, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
eHam Forums / Licensing / RE: What percent fail ham tests?
|
on: November 01, 2011, 12:05:34 PM
|
I just remembered; it was in 'The Wayback Machine'. http://www.twiar.org/aaarchives/WB034.txtDick Bash claimed his operation was 100% legal. He said that since the questions were available via a FOIA request, they weren’t classified and could be published. He further stated that he was justified in publishing “The Final Exam” because the syllabus and License Manuals out there did not adequately prepare applicants for the exams. Indeed, FCC records showed that the failure rate at some exam sessions was 69%--less than 1 out of 3 passed. This was before the Volunteer Exam program. FCC exams were given at the 20 field offices nationwide, and at quarterly, semi-annual, and annual examination sites. If you failed, it might be 3 months or more before you could retake the test.
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
eHam Forums / Licensing / RE: What percent fail ham tests?
|
on: November 01, 2011, 11:11:23 AM
|
|
I read somewhere (think it was on AC6V) that the passing rate for the Advanced Class exam back when the FCC was administering it was about 30%. Times have certainly changed.
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|