|
|
Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 Next
|
|
1
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / RE: Electronic Tubes Explained
|
on: January 27, 2012, 08:38:29 PM
|
Tubes are the one exception to the rule that electronic components contain smoke, and stop working when the smoke is let out.
You're not burning them up hard enough. When the glass implodes, smoke will indeed come out.  73, Bill W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / RE: Digital Storage Oscilloscopes - what to buy?
|
on: October 19, 2011, 12:31:32 PM
|
but this place has their own service department. Heck, I couldn't find an 800# or address anywhere on the Alpha website. The repair link didn't even have an address. What state are they in for sales tax purposes? Did I miss it? That is odd, but here is their address from the email receipt: ALPHA ELECTRONICS 905 DEANS MILL ROAD RAVENA NY 12143 UNITED STATES 208 439-9499 73, Bill W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / RE: Digital Storage Oscilloscopes - what to buy?
|
on: October 18, 2011, 07:46:01 PM
|
|
Fascinating, thanks. I would never have guessed such hacks were possible.
Reminds me of when I worked at Tektronix back in the '70s and '80s. I was a technician on the final test and calibration line when a new version of the venerable 465 scope came out, to be known as the 465B. It was supposed to have the same 100 MHz bandwidth as the old one but we quickly found out it was easily tweakable to 150 MHz with no problem at all. The big bosses immediately told us NOT to tweak it there, but just to hold it down to the advertised 100 MHz. They said if the customer wants more bandwidth, they need to buy a more expensive scope. Not exactly the same as what Rigol is doing, but the same mind set.
If you should ever come across a 465 or 465B, look and see if my name is on the "calibrated by" sticker. I did sevral thousand of them while I was there. At the time it was the all time best selling scope in history, with more than 50,000 sold at about $2500 each.
73, Bill W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
eHam Forums / Station Building / RE: Ground bonding options
|
on: October 17, 2011, 01:30:25 AM
|
|
Remember one basic thing about lightning: Lightning does not want to go into your shack and destroy your equipment. Lightning really just wants to go to ground. Your job is twofold: Give it a short, easy path from your antenna and tower to ground and at the same time make sure there is NO path into your shack.
There is only one absolutely guaranteed way to protect your equipment from lightning strikes and that is to completely disconnect all your cables when lightning is near. And don't just unplug them and leave the plugs a few inches apart. The lightning has already traveled a few thousand feet and a couple more inches is nothing. Unplug the cables and move them far, far apart. Don't waste your money on lightning arresters and such stuff. Distance is your friend.
I know it's a nuisance but lightning is nothing to mess with. Do it right.
73, Bill W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / RE: A dipole question.
|
on: October 08, 2011, 11:31:40 PM
|
|
If you have access to your attic, that's a good place for an HF dipole. As long as you don't have metal shingles or other large amounts of metal close by the roof will be completely transparent to 20 meter RF. The antenna is invisible to neighbors, protected from wind and rain and will work surprisingly well.
I earned my original DXCC with just such an antenna and 100 watts.
If you want to add other bands, just connect those dipoles in parallel at the feed point and run the wires off at a slight angle from each other - about 5 or 10 degrees separation. There is some interaction but not much. Be prepared to do a little trimming and adding.
Since room in an attic is usually lacking, run the center section as long as the attic will allow and bend the ends 90 degrees or whatever will fit. The center section does most of the radiating and the ends just do the resonating. Caution: The ends of the dipole have a LOT of RF voltage so be sure they are will be well insulated from anything combustible.
I highly recommend an SWR analyzer such as one of the MFJ series. It will give you a much quicker picture of what your antennas are doing than trying to use your transceiver and an SWR meter. Money well spent. And you won't be bothering anyone on the air.
Be creative and have fun.
73, Bill W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / RE: Digital Storage Oscilloscopes - what to buy?
|
on: October 08, 2011, 05:15:53 PM
|
|
Thank you Zenki, but it's too late. The Rigol is in the mail.
As you mentioned, I did find cheaper sources in Asia, but the US distributor I bought it from has his own service department and I consider that important.
You're right about the winds of change. We live in interesting times, don't we?
73, Bill W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
eHam Forums / Computers And Software / Cabrillo tools?
|
on: September 25, 2011, 10:06:28 AM
|
|
I guess I've been out of the loop for a while. Whatever happened to the suite of Cabrillo tools? A google search found all kinds of links but no place where the suite can be downloaded. I did find a "Cabrillo Evaluator" but that's not the original. Is the original no longer available? What are the contest sponsors using for log checking?
All comments welcome.
Bill, W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / RE: L-C Meter Kits
|
on: September 22, 2011, 04:20:18 PM
|
|
You can't go wrong with the AADE meter. I've had mine for years and wouldn't be without it.
Bill, W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Amp Build Project - is the GS-35B a good or bad choice?
|
on: September 22, 2011, 11:34:13 AM
|
It has nothing to do with gain<1 at VHF. The most stable tubes are actually tubes that also work best at VHF. Stability is all about grid resonance and plate impedance.
Nothing to do with gain<1 at VHF? Perhaps I wasn't clear in my original post. I was talking about the entire circuit, not just the tube. If the gain of the entire circuit is less than 1, it will not oscillate. As we are all aware, overall circuit gain is made up of many factors, not just the gain of the tube alone. Many builders make the mistake of ignoring the grid-cathode impedance at VHF. By having it unnecessarily high, VHF stability is decreased. Keep it low enough and the fed-back energy will be swamped out, the gain of the overall circuit falls below 1 and the circuit will not oscillate. Bill, W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / RE: Digital Storage Oscilloscopes - what to buy?
|
on: September 17, 2011, 08:11:32 PM
|
Bill:
I have the Rigol DS1052E, which is only 50mhz, but also only costs $350. They make a 100mhz version also. This was my first "new" scope. I have most of the latest Agilent scopes up to a If can find an older scope at a good price, that is an effective way to go, but if you want something with storage capability and color displays, the DS1052E is an option. Looks like a good choice. Thanks! Bill, W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / Digital Storage Oscilloscopes - what to buy?
|
on: September 16, 2011, 09:11:32 PM
|
|
I haven't bought an oscilloscope for about 15 years or more and I see the market has really changed, to say the least. I'm looking for a DSO with 100 MHz or more bandwidth and I see there are a ton of new manufacturers I've never heard of, all from China apparently. Prices range from about $300 to $500 or so. Are any of these any good?
I worked at Tektronix as a technician and supervisor for ten years back in the '80s so I know the older scopes pretty well, but these new ones are a different ball game.
All comments welcome.
Bill, W6WRT
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|