|
|
|
526
|
eHam Forums / DXing / What a bunch of BS! (7H)
|
on: May 10, 2007, 03:52:34 PM
|
|
I don't think the old time hams do this kind of stuff. Not sure why, I just think its the less experienced guys. I started a forum once on intentional QRM. No one really understands it because it's inane and stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
eHam Forums / DXing / Question about working split for DX
|
on: May 10, 2007, 03:49:50 PM
|
|
The reason the DX operator does it is to keep the frequency he is transmitting on clear. He does not need to listen to his own frequency, but everyone else does. If the DX operator gets buried under alot of QRM, no one can work him. Split works better tan everyone piled up on one frequency
|
|
|
|
|
528
|
eHam Forums / DXing / BS7H, etc.
|
on: May 08, 2007, 10:37:28 AM
|
|
My first QSO, the op got me as WB3CX after sending my call correctly twice with a question mark. Have no way to know if he had me right and just made a keying error, I worked him again 10 minutes later. That time he got me as AB3CO, again wrong in the QRM din. I had to do it again 2 hours later to finally get in the log correctly. My guess is that 10-15% of the log entries may be errors. The QRM from people who keep sending their calls after the BS7 op has identified a completely differrent callsign to contact, keeps errors rate is high and the QSO rate down. So wait your turn, find the actual QSX frequency by monitoring the pileup, and your luck will be better.
|
|
|
|
|
529
|
eHam Forums / RFI / EMI / FM Radio Interference
|
on: April 11, 2007, 12:46:24 PM
|
|
My next door neighbor experiences some distortion on his FM radio when I operate on SSB, but not CW. This is at high power output levels only on HF bands 20 meters or shorter. His radio has an internal ferrite antenna and no provisions for an external antenna. It probably has no power transformer. In my own home, on a fairly cheap portable FM radio with a whip antenna, my wife cannot hear any interference at all. His radio is a boom box type unit, plastic case, probably not much shielding. I use a low pass filter. I'm making him a power line RF filter, but if this doesnt work, any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
530
|
eHam Forums / DXing / Contest number needed for QSL?
|
on: April 11, 2007, 12:34:09 PM
|
|
Just fill out your card with the date and time of the QSO, signal report, band, etc. It saves money if you QSL to a station that you had contacts with on more than one band or mode. That way you can document QSos for single band or mode endorsements of DXCC.
|
|
|
|
|
531
|
eHam Forums / DXing / What have you worked at the bottom of the cycle?
|
on: March 30, 2007, 11:34:33 AM
|
|
These are some of my new DXCC entities since 11/2006 Asterisk means I used a KW and a beam. The rest were worked on 200 watts and a vertical Cushcraft R7.
VU7** 3A2 9Q5** 9U0** 1A4 3XM6 5W0 T30 AND T32** ZL7 ZL8 9M8** 9N7** E51P E51N R1FJL 4S7** 8Q7** D60 HK0
I think the point of the post is that rare stuff gets worked every day. The DXpeditions generally have super ops and equipment. Anyone with medium skilla and a useable antenna can work most of the DXpeditions. From the East Coast USA, on a daily basis, 40 meters is open to VK, JA and ZL, KH6 and other interesting pacific DX most mornings, and EU and SA is daily. Lots of Africa 40 meters at 10 PM. Check the DX clusters and keep listening to the weak signals.
|
|
|
|
|
532
|
eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / HY-gain HI-tower
|
on: December 15, 2006, 10:00:55 AM
|
|
I have a HyTower. I run mine with 3 ground rods, one at each leg. I really think you could do it with one ground rod. It is no different in principle than any other 1/4 wave vertical antenna. Six ground rods is not a magic number. A good to great system of radials is the key, attached to the ground rod at the center of the system, as long as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
eHam Forums / DXing / Intentional QRM
|
on: April 22, 2006, 07:04:24 PM
|
|
I started this topic, and have thought about it for a while. In the end there are only a few points I can finish up with. I hope that everyone who is a DXer or a good Ham knows that having an argument with another operator on the frequency of a weak DX station is plain wrong, even if you think you are right. Calling someone a LID or an idiot on frequency is adding to QRM so you are no worse than the person you are accusing. Secondly, you will never convince the person who is misbehaving to stop by insulting them. Finally, all those people who are not split, or asking who the DX station is on frequency should get on the internet and check the DX cluster before asking a silly question. Give the dx operators a chance. If you dont get them today, you will sometime before they go home. Please listen to the gentle reminder " UP!" and split. Listening more can sometimes make for more contacts.
|
|
|
|
|
534
|
eHam Forums / DXing / Intentional QRM
|
on: February 10, 2006, 03:27:43 PM
|
|
I did hear a QRMer on TZ9M on 75 M SSB several nights ago. The QRMer was very sarcastic, making fun of DXers. I'm listening to one of the intentional QRMers on 10.103 now. He is aware that it is annnoying, and laughing at the "Cops" on frequency. The "cops" of course are adding to the QRM. I think the "Cops" should realize that name calling and cursing will only goad the QRM operator into more spectacular misbehavior. They should remain quiet and the QRMer will get bored and go away faster. They love the attention. The motivation to me is still missing, though. I guess Ham radio has no claim to classy status anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
eHam Forums / DXing / Intentional QRM
|
on: February 09, 2006, 06:03:17 PM
|
|
I am opening a discussion of a very sad and unfortunate topic. That is, intentional QRM by radio amatuers on the frequency of what is important to many hams. In particular, throughout February 9 on both 10.1 and 7.0 mHz, on the frequency of the 3Y0X Peter Island Dx group station, several jammers are transmitting carriers at the same time, causing real copy headaches for those interested in this DX activity. Even more unfortunate is that by the strength of the signals, I judge them to be mostly from USA hams, although I can't be sure. After returning to amatuer radio this year, I was shocked to hear this fairly common practice which was not prevalent in the 1960's-70's. This is not pileup QRM, this is pure jamming. I'd like to invite comments, hopefully from those who engage in this intentional interference. Why is this being done? Is there not enough bandwidth to give up 10 kc for 2 weeks for a group that travelled around the world at great expense to add to the hobby? Please educate me.
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|