SCUBA
Member
Posts: 74
|
 |
« on: March 18, 2007, 08:46:38 PM » |
|
Hi, How good is the use of a light bulb for a dummy load?
73/Jack
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
N4LI
Member
Posts: 397
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2007, 09:07:38 PM » |
|
Very poor.
The problems are many. First, resistance varies widely with the heating of the filament. That's bad news, particularly on modern solid-state transmitters. Further, they tend to radiate, rendering the "dummy" part of the load for naught.
It seems that I remember reading about this stuff in one of the license manuals (I can't remember which test; I took 'em very closely together). But, that was a few years back.
Dummy loads are cheap. Just go pick one up.
Peter, N4LI
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WD8PTB
Member
Posts: 671
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2007, 05:22:18 AM » |
|
It worked somewhat with older radios because the older radios would not cut back the power and would put out some power with a high swr. Don't expect a 1:1 swr. 73 Don WD8PTB
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
K8AC
Member
Posts: 1370
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2007, 06:21:56 AM » |
|
If you have no alternative and if your rig doesn't fold back power at the resulting SWR (it will be higher than 50 ohms), then a 100 watt lightbulb will do the job. Unfortunately, the term "dummy load" is a misnomer as it will also radiate fairly well. Back in my Novice days (1959) it was quite common to use a bulb as a dummy load. One day I was testing on 40M CW running maybe 25 watts to a 100 watt bulb and was answered by another Novice about 300 miles away. Quite a surprise!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AA4PB
Member
Posts: 11401
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2007, 07:15:55 AM » |
|
It depends on what you are testing. If you want to check out one of the automatic tuners like an SGC, a 100W lightbulb is ideal. If you are trying to connect it directly to a 50 ohm transmitter then all of the previous responses apply.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
N3OX
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2007, 08:27:25 AM » |
|
"it depends on what you are testing. If you want to check out one of the automatic tuners like an SGC, a 100W lightbulb is ideal."
I like to use a second antenna tuner with a 50 ohm dummy load on the "input" to test other matching networks.
Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KI4NX
Member
Posts: 121
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2007, 09:53:49 AM » |
|
Then there was one ham who hooked up a 100W bulb on top of a 30 foot pole and worked the world! Kinda strange for an antenna but it did radiate.
GL Ken KZ4Y
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AD4U
Member
Posts: 1897
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2007, 12:33:05 PM » |
|
A 250 watt light bulb will have around 52 ohms resistance when lit by 120 VAC. I used light bulbs from 100 watts to 250 watts as a "dummy load" for the first 20 years of my ham career until somebody told me it would not work. Back then most every rig had tube finals and either a pi-network or some type of tunable output network that would tune into the light bulb very well.
Of course the light bulb was no substitute for a real dummy load and it would radiate a signal.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
W7ETA
Member
Posts: 2528
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2007, 01:27:54 PM » |
|
Not a bright idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SCUBA
Member
Posts: 74
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2007, 03:49:52 PM » |
|
Thanks for enlightening me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
W5ONV
Member
Posts: 0
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2007, 04:50:49 PM » |
|
I remember in the late 1960's when I built my Heathkit DX-60 transmitter they gave instructions on how to build a simple light bulb dummy load. They recommended to use that to do the test and tune up tests after building the kit. It worked great and really lit up that 100 watt bulb. 73, Jim
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
W7ETA
Member
Posts: 2528
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2007, 08:49:35 PM » |
|
Guess I have a dim view of this when 50 ohm dummy loads are readily avaliable.
Same for using a 4 foot ground rod instead of wire radials for verticals. Might work better if we attach a light bulb to the ground rods?
Neither excites my electrons enough to get them into outer shells. So, of course, they ain't gonna cough up any photons.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA9SVD
Member
Posts: 2201
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: March 20, 2007, 02:16:23 AM » |
|
Not a bright idea with modern solid-state rigs. In daze gone by, tube output transmitters had Pi-network (or Pi-L)output circuits, and could match a wide range of impedances. And a light bulb has a wide range of impedances at RF; mostly resistance, which varies widely from cold to approximate full brilliance. The old output circuits could match the bulb's resistance, even if it needed adjustment as the power increased; eventually, the resistance (and impedance) would stabilize. THAT won't happen with fixed impedance outputs in modern S-S technology.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AA4PB
Member
Posts: 11401
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: March 20, 2007, 05:48:11 AM » |
|
For QRP we used to use a #47 pilot lamp for a dummy load.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AD4U
Member
Posts: 1897
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: March 20, 2007, 08:46:18 AM » |
|
Glad I could "enlighten you". Maybe that is why my Mom called me sonny (sunny).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|