Call Search

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Friends Remembered
Survey Question

DX Cluster Spots

Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement

donate to eham
   Home   Help Search  
Pages: Prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next   Go Down
Author Topic: Why is Glen Baxter K1MAN back on the air running a broadcast  (Read 62457 times)

Posts: 152

« Reply #30 on: August 15, 2009, 07:06:56 AM »

This is my email to Laura Smith on 8/12/09.

"How long will the investigation be going on? It would seem to me that if the FCC monitored 14.275.00 for a week or two, that would be all the investigation one needed to shut K1MAN down."
This is her response on 8/13/09

"I can't give you a specific answer as to timing as this involves more than just my office.  I can, however, assure you that we are working on the matter internally (even as I type this email)."
Laura L. Smith, Esq. | Special Counsel | Enforcement Bureau | Federal Communications Commission | 1270 Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA  17325 | 717-338-2577 (phone) | (717) 338-2574 (fax)

Jim / K4CAV

Posts: 2

« Reply #31 on: August 19, 2009, 05:23:24 AM »

I heard him on 14.275 last night (18 Aug 2009).  I emailed the FCC's Ms. Smith and all I got back was that "we are aware of the situation and an investigation is ongoing."  I guess all we can do is turn the knob cause the FCC sure isn't doing anything.

Posts: 17


« Reply #32 on: August 19, 2009, 09:12:39 AM »

I thought someone said he was broadcasting from VE7KFM Karol Madera's station in Canada.  Someone could check that out pretty easy I would think.

Posts: 1

« Reply #33 on: August 23, 2009, 03:35:57 PM »

I'm down in Arizona.... VE7KFM comes in clear as a bell down here.  K1MAN is very faint... barely audible, most of the time.  That is consistent with his location in Maine.  Who told you that he was using VE7KFM's station?    I'd like to know who is spreading nasty rumors.

Posts: 4

« Reply #34 on: August 27, 2009, 07:55:01 PM »

I have been hearing him lately on 3890.

Posts: 1707

« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2009, 09:31:20 PM »

".... Who told you that he was using VE7KFM\'s station? I\'d like to know who is spreading nasty rumors."
Is it a nasty rumor?  Why doesn\'t VE7KFM appear here and refute it himself?  That would be helpful.

As to Glenn, well, he might just have a remote base somewhere.  Perhaps a small boat floating offshore.

The unusual behavior of his is interesting.  No operation for about a year or so that we know of.  Total silence.  Then, a few months after Riley Hollingsworth retires, he\'s back doing his same old routine.  Including his "felony affidavit" jazz about people who are ostensibly already using the frequency he wants to broadcast on.

If he took the time to read the Communications Act, he\'d see where it was revised to make all the infractions misdemeanors.

He repeatedly claims that the former FCC SCARE was absent from law school, but Glenn never attended.  And, the inability to read and understand is, in fact, illiteracy.  Connect the dots......

Posts: 2

« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2009, 11:24:40 AM »

Please permit me to put on my hat as Producer of the Amateur Radio Newsline ham radio bulletins.

First an apology to those who are attempting to use 14.275 MHz (and several other frequencies) and find that these frequencies are being monopolized by 24 hr a day / 7 day a week by "news bulletin stations" that in part utilize our material. Frankly, we wish that they would terminate using our newscasts but the cost of litigation to stop this is way beyond our means. And as time has shown, those who indulge in this activity seem to heed no warnings or requests from anyone. Thankfully, the number of people involved in this pseudo-broadcasting is small and I doubt if there will ever come a day when we see frequency after frequency and all of our HF bands tied up with this self-serving activity.

But there is a much larger question that I feel a need to address: That being the rhetorical question if any voice bulletin stations are really needed on the HF bands in light of the proliferation of repeaters who offer the same audio services and their availability using Internet audio -- either streaming or in MP3 downloadable format.

25 or 30 years ago I might have said" yes they do" because there was no World-Wide-Web and few repeaters. But here in 2009 just about every active radio amateur has either a 2 meter or 2/440 radio. Most are also within earshot of one or more repeaters providing the ARRL Audio News. The RAIN Report, our Amateur Radio Newsline or all three.

As I have maintained since Jim Hendershot WA6VQP and I began Newsline as the Westlink Radio News back in 1976, repeaters are the place where news bulletins belong. Heres why.

First, the news services are there because they are akin to invited guests. Unlike HF where someone unilaterally seizes a frequency and begins to transmit, in the case of a bulletin issued on a repeater its there because those who own the system and those who regularly use it have together decided that replaying one or more of these afore mentioned services is of interest to and welcomed by the majority.

Second is audio quality. I cannot speak for others, but our material has always been produced as close to broadcast quality standard as possible. We produce it with repeater and Internet distribution in mind - not SSB.

In the old days we recorded on audiotape at 7 1/2 IPS using donated studio space and professional recorders bearing names like Ampex, Scully, Otari and others of that quality. When donated studio space was not available we recorded using "pro-sumer" grade gear made by Roberts, Teac and Sony. Editing was done by hand using EditAll S-2 and S-3 "blocks" and playback into the phone lines was with Automatic Electric and later Broadcast Electronics spot tape players that had been converted to automated telephone feed operation. Microphones have usually held the names Shure and Electro-Voice and until recently our primary microphone was the all purpose Electro-Voice RE-20. Its only been about a year since we moved from the old EV design to the newer Heil Sound PR-30 and PR-40 mics.

About a decade ago we began phasing out the use of tape for newscast mastering moving to the digital domain -- first with a neat little program called Cool Edit and then to Goldwave and of late Audition. Distribution has gone from a once high of 11 regional phone lines down to 1 as the phones were replaced first by streaming audio (Real Audio) and then to MP3 download from our own website (

It was when we moved to our current web hosting 6 years ago that we finally were able to statistics on how many folks were listening to the newscast and downloading the script text. And the numbers kind of boggled our mind. Just checking as I write this, since about 2 a.m. Pacific last Friday morning when I uploaded the newscast audio, it has been downloaded 3,811 times. (The text version only has 921 downloads to this time.) Our average weekly download -- year to date -- shows as 3864 or close to 4000 people a week downloading our audio.

Granted, its not likely that all of these are hams -- and I would be curious to know how many are and how many are not -- but that's a lot of folks with an interest in hobby radio tuning in via the Internet. To me it says that more people are likely hearing our news bulletins directly from the Internet, from our Podcast or over their local repeater than are tuning in on the High Frequency bands.

Why is that? To me the answer is simple. Be it ARNewsline, RAIN or the ARRL Audio News, people want good fidelity. Listening to a bandwidth restricted SSB signal amidst the noise and din of any of the busy HF bands is at best not easy on ones ears and at worst a painful experience. And I do not know about you, but to me "pain in my ears" is not something that I enjoy. (Well to be honest -- Ill say that with the exception of when I'm attempting to play my Strat electric or my Washburn acoustic -- that "pain in my ears" is not something that I enjoy. Anyone who has heard my attempts at music fully understand.)

I guess it all boils down to this. Back in 1976, Jim Hendershot and I never envisioned what we were starting as a local news bulletin about repeater deregulation as it affected Los Angeles on 220 MHz would grow to the world-wide news and information service it has become. It just happened I think mainly because of the quality of professional volunteer assistance it attracted. Journalists like the late Roy Neal, K6DUE and Alan Kaul, W6RCL, who devoted their time ast work to reporting the news to the masses and their free time to reporting the news of ham radio. I cannot begin to tell you how much I miss them. When each of them passed it was like a little bit of me died with them.

There are a lot of other folks who have been with us from the start and many still with us today. Volunteers all. People like Jim Davis, W2JKD, whom I first met on the old WA2SUR repeater in NYC when I was WA2HVK and he was "Big Bob Evans" spinning the hits on WPLJ FM. Jim now owns his own station group in Florida but after 30+ years hes always available to record our anchor track.

Others include Andy Jarema N6TCQ who not only records but also is the CPA who manages our funds -- both at no cost. Burt Hicks WB6MQV, Robert Sudock WB6FDF, Bon Wilbanks AE5DW, Jim Damron N8TMW, Jeff Clark K8JAC, David Black KB4KCH, Mark Abramowicz, NT3V, Jim Meachen ZL2BHF, Norm Seeley KI7UP, and others to numerous to list here. Broadcast professionals all and all members of our volunteer family. They and the newcommers like Evi Simons. Jerry Guale, and Becca Bruce are the heart of the Amateur Radio Newsline. I take no credit for any of this. Its those who do the writing and reporting who are my heroes. I'm just the guy who writes stories, voices a few now and then, glues the pieces together and pops it onto the website.

I cannot speak for any other ham radio news service nor will I, but it is my personal belief that between bulletin nets repeaters and Internet audio that voice bulletins on the High Frequency bands serve little purpose. They are heard to discern in the din of HF propagation (or lack of it) and they really do nothing to enhance the overall quality of HF voice operations. I'm not advocating that they be banned, but I do have to ask what real purpose do they serve?

Let me end with this little anecdote from a few years ago when Sharon and I decided to celebrate our anniversary with a trip to Alaska. One of our stops was the isolated port city of Valdez which is the southern terminus of the Alaska oil pipeline. Anyhow, here's a place where only a few buildings in the heart of the town had electric power. Its about 9 PM -- still light out as it was the end of August we are in our hotel room. I had with me my HTX-202 HT. For some unknown reason I turned it on and on 146.34 /.94 found a repeater. I put out a call but there was no response. So I put the HT on the nightstand. About an hour later the HT springs to life with a mechanical sounding voice ID followed by the single word "Newsline." The repeater then proceeds to dial a phone number -- which from the tones I recognized as the Newsline machine at my home -- and then began playing the newscast. It was at that moment -- in a spot so isolated -- hearing the tape in the machine emanating from my home office that I realized two things. First the scope of what Jim Hendershot and I had created years earlier.

Of that second thing? That my home in California was still standing and in good shape.

To those of you who listen to or read ARNewsline, my sincere thank-you for your support. To those of you suffering because of its misuse by a small number of hams who believe that they have the right to play broadcaster on any band, I feel for you and truly wish I could do more to help. My hope is that the current FCC enforcement leadership will find a way to assist you and for what it might be worth, the FCC has my full support.

Bill Pasternak, WA6ITF

Posts: 0

« Reply #37 on: September 10, 2009, 02:05:07 PM »

I've got to respond to this. First off Glenn Baxter is ALLOWED to operate on the amateur bands. He allowed to do so until all legal avenues have been diminished, Both in the FCC and in the federal courts. Secondly if he is violating the rules then report him. I've been listening to K1MAN on 14275 MHz. On my new receiver and have yet to hear anything remotely illegal. I think ham operators need to read the rules and understand the difference between broadcasting and information bulletins
Both definitions can found at Part 97.3 (a)(10) and Part 97.3(a)(26)

Part 97.3 (a)(10) Broadcasting. Transmissions intended for reception by the general public, either direct or relayed.

Part 97.3(a)(26) Information bulletin. A message directed only to amateur operators consisting solely of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service.

As for “monopolizing the frequency” there is,  according to the FCC no time limit on an information bulletin, but informational bulletins must share the frequency.  It is also up to the station transmitting the information bulletin to determine if it's “that the subject matter is of direct interest to the amateur service.”. Ham operators have a lot of spectrum, and in such amateurs should be allowed to choice what point of interest of this diverse hobby they should go in. After all ham radio is  

      “ A radiocommunication service for the purpose of self-training, intercommunication and technical investigations carried out by amateurs, that is, duly authorized persons interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest.”

People get into ham radio for their own personal aims, not for your and not for mine. So people should be allowed to do what is of interest to them. Information Bulletins are LEGAL and unless you want to change the rules, they will remain legal. As for this “they are no longer need in the digital age”, Fred Maia W5YI made that same argument some years back in a petition for rule-making, which was shot down by the ARRL.
 I think the FCC won't go after K1MAN is because of the question of “is the rules governing amateur radio content neutral?” You see the rules according to the courts must be content neutral, in other words they must be based on the technical aspects and not on the person speech. Ham have this idea that once you apply for a license you surrender your right to free speech, this however is not true. No where does it state that once you apply for a license you lose your right to free speech if so please show me. There is however certain speech that you can  not be say on the air, but even those area's are gray.  So if the FCC does go after K1MAN, I do see him fighting it and I do see these questions coming up, and I REALLY don't think the FCC wants that because of those simple reason.

Todd N9OGL

Posts: 132


« Reply #38 on: September 18, 2009, 01:34:59 PM »


Todd, I think it boils down to this:

You may be right in that he can legally transmit his "bulletins" and there may not be a time limit, but he's obviously ABUSING this privilege. It's because of people like him that new (more restrictive) rules get written and WE ALL suffer because of it.

Posts: 212


« Reply #39 on: September 18, 2009, 02:42:40 PM »

Until the FCC stops the ARRL "Information bulletins" then
its gona be tuff to stop K1MAN...

I am NOT a ARRL hater ..I do hate what MAN is doing.


There is not alot the FCC can do if its truly an
"Information bulletin"

If there was NO one way TX allowed..the FCC would have
alot more power to stop him and others.


PS..I havent listened to it.

Posts: 0

« Reply #40 on: September 22, 2009, 11:10:32 PM »


I agree, I think the grey area need to be removed, and although there IS no time limit, perhaps the FCC should maybe look into making a time limit, like a half hour or a hour per day, or whatever.

The point I was trying to make, is don't complain about on the web, because it isn't really going to do any good. Complain to the FCC or have the FCC change the rules. Either way, the rules will be changed either by the FCC or a court ruling.

Todd N9OGL

Posts: 4

« Reply #41 on: September 25, 2009, 04:10:22 AM »

N9OGL states: "I think the grey area needd to be removed, and although there IS no time limit, perhaps the FCC should maybe look into making a time limit, like a half hour or a hour per day, or whatever."

I agree too, but the FCC has yet to.  Read pages 22 to 24 of this rule making order:

Maybe it is time for someone to try again.

Posts: 41

« Reply #42 on: October 05, 2009, 12:43:14 PM »

I LMAO when I read your post, Alan, KØBG! And I agree...

Posts: 182

« Reply #43 on: October 06, 2009, 03:10:01 PM »

Not making light of the terrible tragedy with the storms in Indonesia at all but wondering where is the fabled IARN emergency comms activation to assist.

Posts: 19

« Reply #44 on: October 09, 2009, 11:21:42 PM »

Why not just use the "abuser"?

I personally take advantage of the two broadcasters - the Canadian and the American - that broadcast continuously on 20 meters.  I use these two stations as DX beacons!

If I can hear one or the other (as well as the Maritime Mobile Net on 14.300 Mhz), I know that 20 meters is open.

If I don't hear either of the two broadcasters on '275, then I know that the band's dead.  (Or a miracle has happened, and they're both off the air/arrested/licenses revoked/insert-your-favorite-miracle-here!)


Take advantage!  Use these continuous broadcasts as DX beacons!  Let the joke be on them - don't use them to listen to, use them to calibrate your DX "ears"!

"When God gives you lemons, make lemonade... and say 'THANK YOU FOR THE LEMONS, GOD!'"

- Mike
  Victorville, CA, USA
Pages: Prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!