Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Feedline for New HF Antenna  (Read 1304 times)
KG4NVV
Member

Posts: 6




Ignore
« on: February 20, 2002, 01:26:01 PM »

Hello!  I just passed my General exams last weekend and so am preparing to set up a G5RV antenna in the backyard.  In order to avoid drilling holes in the side of the house, I am running the feedline (about 60 to 70 feet of it) through the eaves, into the attic and then down through the ceiling into my shack.  I was thinking of using RG58U cable for this purpose, since it is more flexible and easier to snake through tight spaces.  My question is this:  what is the dB loss per 100' for RG59U versus RG8U?  Will I notice any difference in loss at the HF frequencies (80 through 10 meters)?  Any help is greatly appreciated!  

Thanks and 73,
Raf
Logged
WB2WIK
Member

Posts: 20611




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2002, 02:23:37 PM »

RG58/U (I'd recommend only the stranded conductor RG58C/U -- the solid conductor stuff is too fragile) has very little loss per 60-70', even on 28 MHz, when _matched_.  The problem occurs when it is not matched.  When used with VSWR = 10, as is the case on some frequencies with a G5RV, the loss multiplies and can become unreasonable.

RG8X ("mini-8"), which is only slightly larger in diameter than RG58 (.242" vs. .195" diameter), has substantially less loss, even when mismatched, because it has a far larger gauge center conductor (#16 gauge, vs. #20 gauge), and in coaxial cable, most of the loss is due to the small outside diameter of the inner conductor.

Having said all that, I still don't recommend running transmission lines through attics and walls, unless it is absolutely necessary to do so.  I say this for a variety of reasons, after 37+ years of hamming and installing antennas both for myself, and professionally for others.

"Reasons it's a bad idea to run transmission lines through attics and walls, and it's a good idea to drill a hole and bring the line straight into the shack from outside:"

1.  These lines require service and occasional replacement -- and require same far more frequently than, say, cable TV lines, because we're using them for transmitting and therefore stressing them a great deal more than just receiving does.  The easier your feedline is to get at, for testing and servicing, the happier you will be.

2.  Coaxial cable, or any transmission line, even the best shielded ones, can radiate and receive signals.  This occurs primarily due to mismatches between the cable and its load, which are customary and often necessary.  The G5RV antenna is a perfect example of one which is badly mismatched, by design, on many frequencies.  As a result of the mismatch, there is a reflected "wave" of current that is conducted back down the feedline from the load to the source, and that current is conducted down the _outside_ of the shield, not the _inside_ of the shield, where the intended (incident) transmitted signal is carried.  Thus, that "standing wave" isn't shielded at all.  It radiates.  You don't want that radiation to closely couple to other wiring in your home that is commonly found in the attic, walls and crawl spaces.  You'll be sorry!

3.  Antenna experimenting is the heart of the amateur radio hobby.  What is perfect today tends to suck tomorrow (to put it bluntly) and we tend to make changes frequently.  That's a good thing.  The easier it is for you to completely replace your transmission line(s) when needed, the better.  You may find yourself running a kilowatt next year, in which case RG58 will have to be replaced, because it cannot handle that kind of power.  That's just one small example.  

73 & good luck!

Steve, WB2WIK/6
Logged
K3AN
Member

Posts: 787




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2002, 10:49:55 AM »

If you can install a double-female bulkhead connector at the point where the coax first goes into the house, then only the outdoor portion of the coax run would need to be replaced with any regularity.  The inside coax, sheltered from precipitaton, wind motion, and the sun's ultraviolet rays, should last a very long time. Be sure to adequately weatherproof the connection if it exposed to the elements. You don't want moisture seeping into the indoor portion of the cable run.
Logged
KE4ZHN
Member

Posts: 139




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2003, 11:05:06 AM »

Use RG-8X. Nearly the same size as 58 and lower loss. I believe 8x is only a few thousandths larger in od. I doubt this will be a problem.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!