Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: TS-2000 vs. FT-1000 MK 5  (Read 601 times)
KY6R
Member

Posts: 3135


WWW

Ignore
« on: August 30, 2003, 10:36:42 AM »

I've owned a TS-2000 for more than a year and have worked 272 DXCC entities with it plus over 1000 band fills. I also used it for satellite work, but that was just a passing fancy. I don't care about 6 meters or above.

I am seriously thinking about selling my TS-2000, external antenna tuner and 600W amplifier and getting the FT-1000 MK 5. I am really only interested in HF DX, and the receiver is the most important part of the station for my weak signal CW dx work. (Yes, antennas are also most important). I think the 200 watts will be enough - I'd rather not run an amp, but I also know that for some weak DX, the amp made the difference between being heard or not.

I have read some reviews that seem to say that some of the FT-1000 series radios are unreliable and that Yaesu's support is not that good. But I also hear how wonderful the receiver is. I usually read reviews for all comments and take the "scores" with a grain of salt. I've found the TS-2000 receiver better than the reviews on eHam - its sensitivity is excellent, but I wish it were more quiet and a little more selective.

Any thoughts from people who have used both or own both? I will play with one at HRO today, hopefully band conditions will be good enough to tell if it is the great radio that I have heard that it is.
Logged
KY6R
Member

Posts: 3135


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2003, 11:06:56 PM »

I did get the Yaesu and am selling all my other gear. The receiver is awesome in the MK 5 - it reminds me of the Ten Tec Omni's as far as how quiet it is.

The receiver does seem to be both more selective and sensitive than the TS-2000. And it is a much quieter receiver. The autotuner is quiet in the Yaesu, but it doesn't have the range of the TS-2000.

Don't get me wrong - the TS-2000 is a fantastic radio - but I just have gotten to the point where I want to concentrate on DX and the Yaesu fits the bill perfectly.
Logged
K7VO
Member

Posts: 1010




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2003, 04:34:27 PM »

Take a look at the ARRL Lab Test numbers for the two rigs.  The FT-1000 is very good indeed.  The TS-2000 put up some truly awful receiver numbers, as in worse than my 25 year old Icom IC-701.  Test equipment does not lie.  It doesn't always tell the whole story, but the numbers are, indeed, real.

If I had a sudden financial windfall and could buy any rig I wanted it sure wouldn't be the TS-2000.

73,
Caity
K7VO
Logged
WO8USA
Member

Posts: 73


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2003, 07:02:21 PM »

What will you do with the satellite part of the hobby?  I am in the place of trying to decide which rig--TS2000, MKV, or 756PRO2.  Right now my #1 is HF DX, but I want to get into satellites.

Can I ask if you got to do a side-by side of the 2000 and MK V?  Curious as to the result.  The 200W is great, and I am leaning that way.

Logged
KY6R
Member

Posts: 3135


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2003, 09:03:54 AM »

I look at lab tests and also try to get some experience playing with a rig on the air before I commit to one. I have owned the 756Pro and TS-2000 for over a year and sold them to buy the Mark V, which I have not owned very long at all. I also had an Omni V for a short while.

I guess my opinion is that while you can work DXCC and even get on the honor roll with the 756Pro, the TS-2000 or the Mark V, that the Mark V is the best for HF dx (if that is the only thing you want to do). On a budget, a used Omni V makes a lot of sense. And no matter what - its operator skill, your antenna system and then the rig as far as DXCC - ability is concerned.

I found that the 756Pro and the TS-2000 receivers were (on the air) very similar in their ability to receive weak signal DX. The TS-2000 is a bit noisier and has some nasty birdies. I went from the 756Pro to the TS-2000 because I wanted work satellites when HF conditions were in the dumper. That is still a good choice if you only want one rig to do it all. And it was great for the VHF contests too. Like a swiss army knife - it works but some blades / tools in the knife work better than others.

I had the 756Pro and never looked at the fancy LCD screen - I was too busy listening and trying to work weak signal DX to care what their signal looked like. I admit - in the store the screen surely was enticing. Others may actually use and love that feature - I did not. It didn't do anything to further my DXCC goal. If the satellite bug didn't bite me, and I wanted to choose between the TS-2000 and 756Pro for HF DX-ing, I would have kept the 756Pro over the TS-2000.

I also had the priviledge to play with an Omni V for quite a few months. That was a super CW rig for DX-ing, and I think it is the best deal for used market CW dx-ing rigs. It wasn't that great sounding on SSB. But I work mostly CW unless a new one is SSB only - which happens quite a bit. It is a 100W rig and there are some well published mods and firmware upgrades to make it a super duper rig.

I like all of these rigs - its just that after a few years of being back on the air I have noticed that I spend all of my ham time chasing DX, and that for me, the Mark V is the best rig I've come across for doing this one ham activity.

After I reach honor roll and 5BDXCC QRO, I will try it QRP - probably with a K2.

And remember, these are just my opinions and my experience - your mileage will most likely vary.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!