Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Opinions on the Ten-Tec Jupiter?  (Read 3509 times)
N5RWJ
Member

Posts: 461




Ignore
« on: December 07, 2011, 03:46:18 PM »

Any owners have Comments on the Jupiter?
Logged
KA5N
Member

Posts: 4380




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2011, 04:25:11 PM »

There are 151 reviews of the Jupiter on eHam's product review section.
Why not look there?
Don't know where the product review section is?  Look down the list on the left
side of the page.

Allen             By the way the average rating is pretty good.
Logged
KB2HUK
Member

Posts: 164




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2011, 11:55:35 AM »

I ran a Jupiter for almost two years with no problems . I traded a Icom 746 for it and it most certainly outperformed it on HF .  The sound of side band coming out of the transceiver was excellent and I really enjoyed listening to it . I think it is a very nice transceiver and easy to use and I often got unsolicited reports of great transmit audio .  Very very nice in its price class .  John kb2huk
Logged
N5RWJ
Member

Posts: 461




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2011, 06:48:18 PM »

I ran a Jupiter for almost two years with no problems . I traded a Icom 746 for it and it most certainly outperformed it on HF .  The sound of side band coming out of the transceiver was excellent and I really enjoyed listening to it . I think it is a very nice transceiver and easy to use and I often got unsolicited reports of great transmit audio .  Very very nice in its price class .  John kb2huk
John, I wonder what in the future for the Jup, will tentec continue to offer software improvements for it, or just drop it as Apple would, and then come up with a new hardware design?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!