"When you are the only person agreeing with you, you've lost the argument/debate."
I have proven, by the actions and statements of others on this string and indisputable facts, that bias moderating
does in fact exist on eHam.net. I know that many of you don't like facts
getting in the way of opinion and emotion
, but the truth has a way of doing that.
As far as only agreeing with myself, I would point out that of the 13 posters who communicated on this string, 5 are "eHam.net bullies and stalkers" previously marked with the "ignore button." Another was one of the "eHam.net administrators" who's opinion can only be considered bias due to his position. When you subtract their posts, that leaves only 8 responses that can be seriously considered out of 3036 current views
on the topic. You only have 3028 to go
, at last count, before your "opinion" can be considered to have any
merit. Unfortunately, many will not post a comment because they do not want to be attacked and stalked
forever by the gang of "eHam.net bullies" who seem to enjoy special treatment or invited to leave
eHam.net by those in charge.
Where I come from, when a single person, based on the facts, disagrees with everyone else in the room, he is referred to as "enlightened
Previously, I suggested a simple and fair solution to these issues that would make moderation much simpler and the eHam.net experience more enjoyable for everyone
. That was the "single post per string rule
." Since eHam.net has upgraded the site, posters can add as many comments as they want to their original
post. It would shorten the threads so they are easier to glean information from and the "ignore button" would be much more effective. It would end many of the social problems. As usual, I never critique without making good suggestions for improvement. In this case, I have made many. Hopefully, they will be considered by those in charge.