Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL WRITTEN COMMENTS OF HAMS FOR ACTION  (Read 2390 times)
WA5VSK
Member

Posts: 35


View Profile

Ignore
« on: May 11, 2012, 12:25:25 PM »

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20554

Emergency Communications by                       )                                       
Amateur Radio Service Operators                    )                                       Docket No. 12-91




ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL WRITTEN COMMENTS OF HAMS FOR ACTION
   
As you know, earlier today HAMS FOR ACTION informed the FCC that we are
willing to accept a truncated Reply Comments period in Docket 12-91.   We proposed a
Reply Comments period which will span only two workdays:    from Friday, May 18
through Monday, May 21.
   
   Let’s make a deal.
   If the Commission will agree to allocate two workdays to reap potentially robust
input from Reply Comments, then HAMS FOR ACTION will agree not to file a Petition For
Reconsideration as soon as the May 17 Written Comments deadline has passed.   
If it becomes necessary, the HFA Petitionwill ask the FCC to correct its procedural
errors in this Docket.     Responding to the Petition will undoubtedly delay completion of
the study by more than the two days the FCC will save by denying our modest request.
   We won’t even talk about injunctions    --    but we know what they are.
Hams For Action
May 11, 2012
Page Two


   Incidentally:
   Getting back to a possible Petition For Rehearing, we can count at least two
procedural errors at this point.
   First, the FCC has deviated from standard procedures by abolishing completely the
Reply Comments period which is normally available to all commenting parties.    Even
Notices of Inquiry   --   which, exactly like the current proceeding, do not involve proposed
rules but may lay the groundwork for them  --   feature a 14-day Reply Comments period.
   Second, the FCC not only abolished the Reply Comments period, completely,
but it did so without explaining its reasoning to the public or even announcing its decision
to the public.    Instead, the FCC simply failed to declare a Reply Comments deadline.     
Until W. LEE McVEY W6EM of Alabama and NICKOLAUS LEGGETT  N3NL of
Virginia started asking questions, HFA Members simply assumed that the missing Reply
Comments deadline was an administrative oversight.   We shrugged off the omission,
mentally added 14 days to the May 17 Written Comments deadline and planned on a
comment period that would end on May 31.
   In any event, the FCC’s “double deviation” from the procedural norm is the
current totality of our potential legal complaint.   However, given time, we may be able to
identify even more procedural errors    --    assuming the Commission decides that even our
request for a two-workday Reply Comments period is too much to ask.

Hams For Action
May 11, 2012
Page Three



Respectfully submitted,

Don Schellhardt, Esquire KI4PMG
3250 East Main Street, #48
Waterbury, CT 06705
djslaw@gmail.com
(203) 982-5584

Logged
WN9HJW
Member

Posts: 221


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2012, 01:16:06 PM »

Yawn
Logged
KI4SDY
Member

Posts: 1452


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2012, 01:53:28 AM »

Yes. comrad. Your lack or participation bores me. In fact, you are boring yourself!  Grin
Logged
K1CJS
Member

Posts: 4466


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2012, 05:26:40 AM »

All this guy Schellhardt is doing is making a name for himself as a reactionary that likes to continually repeat himself and make waves.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!