Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: With the new narrow band mandate, can the ft-60r be adjusted for that?  (Read 3418 times)
KC9RCG
Member

Posts: 142


View Profile

Ignore
« on: June 30, 2012, 09:17:59 AM »

I know that doesn't affect ham. However, I am more interested in listening to police and fire traffic. I got the idea that the ft-60r does not do that.

confirmation?
Logged
K6LCS
Member

Posts: 978


View Profile WWW

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2012, 10:03:27 AM »

All CFR 47 Part 90 business, educational, industrial, public safety, and state and local government VHF (150-174 MHz) and UHF (421-512 MHz) Private Land Mobile Radio (PLMR) licensees operating legacy wideband (25 kHz bandwidth) voice or data/SCADA systems are to migrate to narrowband (12.5 kHz bandwidth or equivalent) systems by January 1, 2013.

The FT-60R's synthesizer provides for channel steps of 5, 10, 12.5, 15, 20, 25, 50, and 100 kHz per step.

I *think* receiving will be OK ...

Clint Bradford K6LCS
Logged

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
http://www.work-sat.com
KB1LKR
Member

Posts: 1864


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2012, 11:40:39 AM »

Should be fine I'd think. Turn up the volume a little to adjust for the lower (2.5 kHz) deviation?
Does the Wide/Narrow (5.0/2.5 kHz) menu setting have any RX impact or only changes the 2m & 70 cm Tx deviation?
Or are you worried about 6.25 kHz channel spacings vs. 5/10/12.5?
Logged
KC9RCG
Member

Posts: 142


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2012, 12:08:17 PM »

My understanding is that I would lose around 50% volume. The ft-60r is not the best volume under normal circumstances.
Logged
K6LCS
Member

Posts: 978


View Profile WWW

Ignore
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2012, 10:51:31 AM »

>> ... The ft-60r is not the best volume under normal circumstances ...

I sold hundreds of these radios while working for the largest ham dealer in the US, and I own several of them. NEVER have I heard a complaint of "poor receive volume" - unless someone went in and messed with deviation or something. What seems to be the problem with yours?

I mean, if the receive volume of a FT-60R is too weak for your environment, then you need to consider an audio accessory (speaker-mic, earpiece). Because the FT-60R is as loud - or louder - as many commercial rigs costing a heck of a lot more.

Clint Bradford K6LCS
909-241-7666
« Last Edit: July 03, 2012, 11:06:03 AM by K6LCS » Logged

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
http://www.work-sat.com
K9KJM
Member

Posts: 2416


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2012, 11:48:49 PM »

>> ... The ft-60r is not the best volume under normal circumstances ...

I sold hundreds of these radios while working for the largest ham dealer in the US, and I own several of them. NEVER have I heard a complaint of "poor receive volume" - unless someone went in and messed with deviation or something. What seems to be the problem with yours?

I mean, if the receive volume of a FT-60R is too weak for your environment, then you need to consider an audio accessory (speaker-mic, earpiece). Because the FT-60R is as loud - or louder - as many commercial rigs costing a heck of a lot more.

Clint Bradford K6LCS




I agree.     The FT60 does have lots of audio.   And as already pointed out, The commercial narrowbanding will simply have the effect of reducing deviation, So your audio level will be less.
909-241-7666
Logged
KM3F
Member

Posts: 434


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2012, 04:52:33 PM »

I agree, volume is directly tied to deviation.
You can't do anything about it but raise the audio output using some means.
It's just the same as having wide deviation but speaking softly. The volume will be low despite the wide deviation capability if there is not enough audio amplitude to drive the transmitter into a wider deviation.
The opposite of this is narrow deviation being driven by loud audio.
What happens is there is a clipper circuit plus a deviation limiter in the receiver and transmitters to keep this under control.
Otherwise you would hear a lot of distortion "on FM" no less, during voice loudness peaks.
So standards are set to adjust equipment to.
One direction keeps distortion under control, the other way the audio goes lower.
Which way would you rather have it?
Good luck.
Logged
AA4PB
Member

Posts: 11407


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2012, 05:16:41 PM »

There is one other issue. With narrow banding, a station occupying the adjacent channel be closer to your selected channel and may interfere because your receiver IF filters are wide enough to receive both channels.

Narrow banding includes lowering the deviation on the transmitters and reducing the IF bandwidth of the receivers.
Logged
KM3F
Member

Posts: 434


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #8 on: July 04, 2012, 10:44:24 PM »

Receiver IF band width is a very good point.
Our radios don't narrow the bandwidth that I know of but  the new commerical radio designs surely must have narrower IF performance or seems it would defeat half the reason for going NBFM.
Logged
2E0JTP
Member

Posts: 10


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2012, 01:54:35 PM »

I know that doesn't affect ham. However, I am more interested in listening to police and fire traffic. I got the idea that the ft-60r does not do that.

confirmation?


Page 57 of the FT-60R instruction manual explains how to change the channel step size (5/10/12.5/15/20/25/50/100 kHz). Page 62 of the FT-60R instruction manual explains how to change between wide (5kHz) FM deviation, and narrow (2.5kHz) FM deviation.

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!