Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Did you never worked a robot ?  (Read 3816 times)
F5FRM
Member

Posts: 22


WWW

Ignore
« on: April 21, 2013, 06:11:37 AM »

I share this info as I find the job very impressive. A local radioclub, F5KCK, has built a 24/24 CW robot that you can work on 28.110, QSX 750hz up. He is calling CQ every 5 min. He sends at your own speed and he can answer to several questions. I worked him several times with my bugkey and it often happened to me to smile, thinking I was not working a humain being but a computer.

As the propagation is becoming better on 10m, you may give a try ?
You can find more info on www.f5dm.fr
« Last Edit: April 21, 2013, 06:33:46 AM by F5FRM » Logged
N3QE
Member

Posts: 2421




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2013, 07:19:39 AM »

A grainy picture of "Z80 OP", which made the first automated CW QSO's in 1986 Field Day, is in this powerpoint:

http://www.kkn.net/~tree/ContestBanquet.ppt
Logged
AA4PB
Member

Posts: 13032




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2013, 10:54:26 AM »

Now all we need is robots that can tune the bands and work other robots then automatically submit the log. They could even send a text message to our cell phones when the robot is issued the DXCC award.  Grin
Logged
F5FRM
Member

Posts: 22


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2013, 04:26:40 PM »

Thanks for the Z80 OP info !

Yes, a robot to work other robots would be funny. I am just wondering what they would have to say to each others. An ideas nets improvement, until they decide to exterminate mankind !  Roll Eyes

But the technical aspect is very interesting, even if I am not fond at all of all reverse beacons, skimmers, etc. It is useful to train and to check if your straight key or bug key sending is good enought to be readable by a computer.
Logged
K8AXW
Member

Posts: 3996




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2013, 06:16:06 PM »

I read an amusing story in, I think, CQ magazine many years ago where a guy developed a computer that could operate totally independent of human intervention.

That included calling CQ, establishing a contact, exchange signal reports, and print out a QSL card.  The operator checked on this computer every few days and found that he had achieved WAS, WAC and DXCC the first week!

There's no doubt in my mind that this will eventually happen!
Logged
W1JKA
Member

Posts: 1821




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2013, 11:31:09 AM »

  I think I heard two reverse beacon stations giving each other 599 signal reports the other day.
Logged
AA5TB
Member

Posts: 81


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2013, 06:37:56 PM »

I worked a robot station on the Russian satellite RS-10 over 20 years ago.

73,
Steve - AA5TB
Logged
JAHAM2BE
Member

Posts: 286


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2013, 04:03:52 AM »

JF1OZL has an amusing comment on this phenomenon on his web page here, point number 17:

http://www.intio.or.jp/jf10zl/proposal.htm

Basically, he says that most hams don't homebrew anymore. The rig is almost always store-bought; the antenna is frequently store-bought; the ham is interested only in the operation. But if the operation is also automated by software, then what is the role of the ham? His sardonic answer: the ham's role is then just to spend money on the station. Smiley
Logged

F5FRM
Member

Posts: 22


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2013, 04:15:06 AM »

Or to push his callsign of the top of the dxcc / other diplomas lists / local town historic top dxers, etc ?

It would not work anymore without a narcissistic return on investment.
Logged
K8AXW
Member

Posts: 3996




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2013, 08:37:26 AM »

JKA:  Very funny   Cheesy
Logged
K3STX
Member

Posts: 1076




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2013, 09:47:12 AM »

Yes, a robot to work other robots would be funny. I am just wondering what they would have to say to each others.

They will be saying "5NN 123" (or whatever the next incremental serial number will be). I am sure it will not be long till the CW Simmer technology will be used to FIND the stations, TUNE onto them, and ANSWER them in contests. Why would somebody cheat like this? To see if they can do it.

paul
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!