Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sunspot number & propagation  (Read 7647 times)
KD6KWZ
Member

Posts: 276




Ignore
« on: November 17, 2013, 11:32:26 PM »

I notice on the solar weather sites that the sunspot numbers have hit the high 200's several times lately. Yet, some DX charting sites mention nothing about sunspot number, just SFI, A, & K. I know A & K show the noise level.

So, why is sunspot number ignored by some sites? How much of a factor is it? I did get CT2HTM when the SN was like 272 a few days ago on 10 meters, with only 22 watts into a delta loop, my first European contact.
Logged
K8GU
Member

Posts: 716


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2013, 11:59:36 AM »

A few things to separate out here---all of these numbers are pretty crude ways to capture some features of the sun-ionosphere system.  The sunspot number is kept because there is a long historical record of sunspot counting observations.  Later, it was found that the 10.7-cm radio flux (eventually SFI) was a convenient proxy for sunspot number that was easier to collect.  Plus, even when there were few sunspots, the SFI varied.  It seemed that SFI also had a better bearing on things like the maximum usable frequency (MUF) estimates that HF users wanted.  So, that was adpoted.  For the past decade or two, we now have solar extreme ultraviolet observations that tell us the relative intensities of the actual wavelengths of ionizing radiation that create the ionosphere.  It turns out that especially for low solar activity, the 10.7-cm flux bottoms out and the EUV keeps dropping.  So, the EUV is a better indicator of what the ionosphere is going to do.  All of that said, for the kinds of things that hams do, the SFI seems to be pretty good and probably better than the sunspot number alone. 

A and K are actually indications of geomagnetic activity more so than noise levels.  Geomagnetic storms are often associated with processes that cause absorption of HF signals.  For example, most paths from the U.S. to Europe pass through the auroral region, especially when it has expanded equatorward during periods of geomagnetic activity.  This increases absorption on those paths.
Logged
KD9VV
Member

Posts: 26




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2013, 12:53:14 PM »

Sunspots; often associated with CME's are not a good predictor for HF ionization or lack thereof. All sun spots do NOT create CME's. Oft times a single spot can and has produced a hugh CME...at other times, many SS's hace created little ionization; again, unpredictable.

Looking at the steroscopic Sat (A) and Sat (B) views is a far better predictor for ionization strikes.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!