|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
|
1-5 of 5 messages
|
  Page 1 of 1  
|
|
rg6 coax
|
Reply
|
|
by K9RLX on September 29, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I have a question that maybe a couple people could share there opinions/thoughts on. Is it true rg6 coax has higher power handeling and lower loss then rg8x? Currently both my antennas are run with rg8x. My scanner I have rg6. I want to put up a secondary vhf antenna and a 20 meter dipole and maybe even a 40 meter dipole. I have 2 spools of rg6 just sitting in my garage if I could use that then I would save myself a lot of money from not having to buy more cable. Yes I know there is the 75 vs 50 ohm but I don't think my tunner is going to care and I would think the dipoles would match the rg6 better then the rg8 and the vhf antenna well that is only a secondary so if swr is 1.5 thats not a big deal even 2.0 is not going to hurt my rig. Curious to hear some other peoples thoughts on this.
One last thing when i used the rg6 for my scanner I put a F connector on the cable then used a F to pl-259 adaptor. I found these adaptors online for like 3 dollars a piece and even have 2 spares laying around in the house.
|
|   |
|
RE: rg6 coax
|
Reply
|
|
by AA4PB on September 29, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
You won't have any problems with the dipoles (where a tuner is used). It could be an issue for transmitting on VHF, depending on the length of the run. While the SWR on a 50 ohm antenna will be 1.5:1, the impedance at the transmitter will change with line length because the 75 ohm cable will act as a transmission line transformer. If you can make the length a multiple of 1/2 wavelength (including velocity factor of the coax) then the antenna impedance (50 ohms) will repeat at the radio. The worst case length would be an odd multiple of 1/4 wavelength.
|
|   |
|
RE: rg6 coax
|
Reply
|
|
by K5NDB on September 29, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
What AA4PB said. He is entirely correct. I use it on HF with no problems and it is mucho cheaper and easier to find.
|
|   |
|
RE: rg6 coax
|
Reply
|
|
by K9RLX on September 29, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Thanks, Just wanted to post and see what other peoples thoughts were before I ran them. I am going to set it up this weekend and see how things work. I will try and make the vhf a multiple of 1/2 wave and we will see how it works out. Thanks again!
|
|   |
|
RE: rg6 coax
|
Reply
|
|
by WB6BYU on October 1, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Because of uncertainties in the velocity factor of the
coax, it is difficult to cut it to a multiple of half wave
simply by formula for a long cable and a short wavelength.
Just make the cable long enough and check the SWR at the
rig: if it is too high shorten the cable and try again.
You'll want to check the SWR variation across the desired
operating frequencies, since even with a 50' cable the
electrical length changes by about a quarter wavelength
across the 2m band. (This is even more of a problem with
higher frequencies and longer cable lengths.)
Another solution is to use 1/12 wave transformers at each
end to convert between 50 and 75 ohms, using short sections
of 50 and 75 ohm coax. Or, if possible, adjust your
antenna to match 75 ohms, and the SWR should be usable
at the shack end.
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
Forum, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Forum Manager.
|
|
|