eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


eHam.net Forum : Articles : Ham Radio Operators Go Whole Hog with Unorthodox H Forum Help

11-13 of 13 messages

Previous   Page 2 of 2  


RE: Ham Radio Unorthodox Reply
by K4RAF on July 8, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
RAF: "Currently operating 802.11 under Part 97 requires a full time lawyer"

YZ: "Why? Are you violating Part 97?"

No, to run off tin-horned "professional amateurs" like yourself, who insist on arguing the inane legalese of "current" Part 97's vs actual implementation vs Part 15 freedom, numbers & mass...

Never let the technology advancements get in your way.

Go fly a kite Stevie!

Raf
 
RE: Ham Radio Unorthodox Reply
by K4YZ on July 8, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
>>RAF: "Currently operating 802.11 under Part 97 requires a full time lawyer"

>>YZ: "Why? Are you violating Part 97?"

>>No, to run off tin-horned "professional amateurs" like yourself, who insist on arguing the inane legalese of "current" Part 97's vs actual >>implementation vs Part 15 freedom, numbers & mass...

>>Never let the technology advancements get in your way.

>>Go fly a kite Stevie!

I see you are unable to answer the questions put to you in a mature and adult-like manner, "Raf". (BTW: Is that short for "riff-raf"? It seems appropriate)

There's nothing "inane" about complying with the regulations of the radio service in which you are a licensee. In case you haven't read the back of your station license, it's a condition of licensure.

If you feel the constraints of the service aren't keeping up with technology, you're welcome to submit a petition for rulemaking with the FCC to accomodate your idea of what is not inane. Or apply for a Part 5 STA. Otherwise, it's just whining on your part.

You're dismissed.

Steve, K4YZ
 
RE: Ham Radio Unorthodox Reply
by K4RAF on July 9, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
Can you see my salute?

Go back to Usenet harassment!
 

Previous   Page 2 of 2  

 
Next Topic:   FD '90
Previous Topic:   A Ham Radio Weekend for Talking to the Moon:

This Topic is Linked

This discussion is regarding an item in the Articles area of eHam.net.

View the item being discussed



Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help


Search Articles:

Check our help page for help using Forum, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the Forum Manager.