eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


eHam.net Forum : Articles : FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference to R Forum Help

1-10 of 10 messages

  Page 1 of 1  


FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference to R Reply
by KT0DD on January 9, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Yeah, They'll cite a homeowner no problem, but just try to get them to cite one of the BPL companies that are creating willful and malicious interference! HA!

The FCC needs a good housecleaning to get rid of all the politicians and get technical expertise back as their foundation. 73.
 
FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference to R Reply
by W5GNB on January 9, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
YES, K0TDD has it right on!!

Since these devices were radiating such a high level of trash, I wonder if they were "FCC APPROVED" devices???

It wouldn't suprise me to see the big "STAMP of APPROVAL" on these chargers and no telling how many other devices JUST LIKE THESE are being sold to the general and NON-TECHNICAL public....

I am sure the FCC would have a real pretty MULTI-PAGE report "verifying" the Part-15 compliance of these devices if they are of the approved type!!!

 
RE: FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference Reply
by KT8K on January 10, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Beyond the squabbling of neighbors (which will occur, and can't be predicted or necessarily accounted for,) poor quality products that generate RFI are just more hidden costs of the government deregulation trend started during the Reagan era. Isn't government supposed to be protecting the public, as one of its reasons for existence? Seems like it's become "screw the little guy, protect commerce."

I don't like big government any more than anyone else, but there are certain functions that can't be done otherwise. "Big money" would have us forget that, if possible, so they have free reign (pun intended).
 
RE: FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference Reply
by KT8K on January 10, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Thanks to Riley & company for wading in on this one. If you have a problem like this, document the heck out of it - it might come in handy.
73 de kt8k - Tim
 
FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference to R Reply
by WA2JJH on January 10, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Hmmmmm, It seems so strange when the foot is on the other hand!
 
FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference to R Reply
by WA2JJH on January 10, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Hmmmmm, It seems so strange when the foot is on the other hand!
 
RE: FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference Reply
by W9WHE-II on January 12, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
WOW...kinda like "man bites dog" stories. Gotta love it. Now mabey some of you will get off Riley's back!

W9WHE
 
FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference to R Reply
by KL7FH on January 13, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I had a Dewalt 24V drill battery charger pulsing at my place. I had a friend doing some plumbing and he put the charger on in the afternoon. It drove me nuts! I finally found it in my own home..I could hear it 1/4 mile in all directions from the source. Just a heads up for those who may hear the same thing..constant cyclic clicking from 3.5 to 432 mhz!
73
Frank KL7FH
 
FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference to R Reply
by WB9OMC on January 18, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
This really doesn't surprise me at all. I have
tracked all kinds of odd noises that were wreaking
havoc on one radio or another. Some of them came
from within my own home; for instance, my TV set
creates more interference to my radios than vice
versa. That's an interesting turnaround from the
middle 70's, when I first became an Amateur. I
shelved one answering machine because its
microprocessor generated so much crap it pinned the
needle on my HF rig on nearly all bands! I have a
pair of GE circleline flourescant lights in my
garage that are supposed to be identical - one of
them is clean but the other generates a huge amount
of trash in the 2 meter band. Shut off the light
switch, problem goes away. And yes, I have tracked
some noise to neighboring homes. As a rule, it has
never been bad enough for me to even approach them
about it - BUT, after reading this article, I may
keep copies of it around and hand them out to
offending neighbors.

Duane
WB9OMC
please read the article "FCC Buries Amateur Petition"
 
RE: FCC Cites Homeowners for Causing Interference Reply
by WB5WPA on February 4, 2005 Mail this to a friend!

W5GNB on January 9, 2005 wrote, in part:

"Since these devices were radiating such
a high level of trash, I wonder if they
were "FCC APPROVED" devices???" "

W5GNB, I had an opportunity to track down a 'set'
of these kinds of scooter chargers last summer.

The source was a block west, one street over, we
share the same 'alley way' and I think the same
primary AC (distribution) line (7 or 14 KV I don't
know which through the underground, buried
utilities in the alley).

The interference was notable on 20 Meters and was
obscuring signals in the PSK31 portion of the band
(around 14.070 MHz). I utilized a Sears AM/FM/SW
portable to track down within a few houses the
source to the offending residence; a subsequent
conversation started with a gentleman outside
and near the are I had DF'd the source to revealed
that he was having trouble with 'noise' occasionally
on his TV set! Eureka! We worked to solve the problem
through some searching and found out that these
'scooter chargers' were the source of both his
noise (they _were_ affecting VHF low-band TV
channals) and my noise!

Additionally, upon close visual inspection
of the chargers and their manuals, there
were _no_:

a) required Part 15 'markings' (or labels) on
the chargers themselves

b) nor was there the required Part 15 'wording'
in the manuals.

Regards, Jim / WB5WPA /

P.S. I've also got a noisy 'Guest' model 2623 charger living next door; most of the time they leave it unplugged at my request (otherwise 80M is wiped).
 

  Page 1 of 1  

 
Next Topic:   Ditty Dumb Dumb Ditty
Previous Topic:   FCC Releases Hundreds of Pages of BPL Test Data, F

This Topic is Linked

This discussion is regarding an item in the Articles area of eHam.net.

View the item being discussed



Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help


Search Articles:

Check our help page for help using Forum, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the Forum Manager.