|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
|
1-8 of 8 messages
|
  Page 1 of 1  
|
|
Homeland Security
|
Reply
|
|
by KG4JMW on May 3, 2002
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
73 All,
I see alot of posts reg. Skywarn, Ares, etc.... What I would like to see is a Homeland security type net dedicated only to emergencies that may arise as a direct result of terrorism. This net or club would also be responsible for keeping their eyes and ears open to possible terrorism before it can happen.
Is this something we could put together? is it a good idea? If not, Why?.
73,
KG4JMW
William
|
|   |
|
RE: Homeland Security
|
Reply
|
|
by KE4SKY on May 3, 2002
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I view Homeland Security as a proper topic for this forum. Virginia RACES is very actively involved in terrorism awareness training as part of our EmCom mission. As professional emergency managers assume an "all hazards" approach to planning, ARES, RACES, ACS, REACT, MARS, etc. must do likewise.
I encourage everyone to visit our web site at http://www.varaces.org click on the training page and download the training module on terrorism awareness. This is based on the National Fire Academy, and NERTC Domestic Preparedness Campus course materials. I would ask that these be as widely circulated as possible. Please take advantage of the free .pdf downloads.
73 de KE4SKY
Virginia RACES State Training Officer.
|
|   |
|
RE: Homeland Security
|
Reply
|
|
by W0IPL on May 9, 2002
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I think a separate net/group just for homeland security would spend 99.9% of its time waiting for something to do. When you include the regular ARES/RACES events you can at least stand a chance for the group to be active.
Take a look at how many actual "homeland security" events we have had in the last year. One BIG one in New York and *very* little else. You really need to have something for your volunteers to do to keep them active and happy.
To look at going beyond communication - "keeping their eyes open for..." is looking for trouble. There are MANY local, state and federal law enforcement people with proper training AND experience "keeping their eyes open". An Amateur Radio group attempting to duplicate that effort would be counter productive and possibly dangerous.
Pat, W0IPL
|
|   |
|
RE: Homeland Security
|
Reply
|
|
by K3WVU on May 31, 2002
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
You may want to get involved with MARS. The primary mission of MARS is emergency communications and there is an effort underway now to involve MARS more directly in the homeland security function. I'm an active Navy MARS operator, so I suggest you may want to start by visiting our website at www.navymars.org.
73s
Dwight K3WVU/NNN0TPR
|
|   |
|
RE: Homeland Security
|
Reply
|
|
by AD7DB on June 5, 2002
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Seems to me that if we could rally under the Homeland Security blanket, we could eventually defeat CC&Rs. What HOA would want to appear "un-American" by denying antennas to a station involved in Homeland Security?
Just an idea...
|
|   |
|
RE: Homeland Security
|
Reply
|
|
by WA4PTZ on November 23, 2002
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
That would be redundant and unnecessary since ARES and
RACES already exist. Although most HAMS don't really
understand the requirements of RACES. Even Operation
Skywarn groups can assist in times of emergency.
It's all about organization and cooperation. Not
power and influence.
The new Homeland Security ACT is about POWER .
Not organization and cooperation.
HAMS will not benefit, and may even be deterred, by this act.
73 - Tim
|
|   |
|
RE: Homeland Security
|
Reply
|
|
by KC0HQK on April 6, 2003
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
HOA's serve a useful purpose even though I don't like them. My request to install a three element vertical array, 32 feet tall. I was denied for two reasons: one for avigation interference and the second I may comprimise the security at the local military bases (of which there are many). And finally I would interefere with the local commercial aircraft traffic.
Can one buy a new house without the restrictive HOA rules? Not around here.
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
Forum, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Forum Manager.
|
|
|