|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
|
1-5 of 5 messages
|
  Page 1 of 1  
|
|
VHF Antenna Question
|
Reply
|
|
by LETTERX on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I have a VHF antenna question. I need to create an antenna for a scanner that can be attached to a glass surface (in other words, two dimensional). Obviously this is for receiving only. Which will work better?
1. A vertical dipole with the center conductor of the coax attached to a 1/4 wave element pointing up, and the shielding of the coax attached to a 1/4 wave element pointing down.
2. A 1/4 wave ground plane with only two plane elements, with the center of the coax attached to a 1/4 wave element pointing up, and the shielding of the coax attached to two horizontal 1/4 wave elements, one pointing left, and the other pointing right, so that the whole antenna looks like an inverted "T".
3. Some other configuration of 1/4 wave elements.
|
|   |
|
RE: VHF Antenna Question
|
Reply
|
|
by AA4PB on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I think option 1 would give you the best omni-directional pattern. It amounts to a vertically mounted half-wave dipole.
|
|   |
|
RE: VHF Antenna Question
|
Reply
|
|
by WB6BYU on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I just installed option 2 on my window. It is just as
good as option 1 from a pattern standpoint (at least as
modeled using EZNEC).
The main choice between them is the direction that the
coax cable comes off: from the side for a dipole, or from
the bottom for a ground plane. Use whichever is more
convenient in your situation.
Another antenna I've used on a window is a rectangular
loop: use the general formula for circumference but make
it twice as wide as it is tall and feed it in one of
the vertical (short) sides for a 50 ohm feedpoint.
With any antenna there may be some detuning due to the
dielectric effect of the window glass, but that hasn't
been too much of a problem in practice. My latest
ground plane is for 440, and it is still too long but
it works well enough that I haven't bothered trimming it.
This is a good time of year to stock up on small suction
cups for mounting such antennas, as they are often sold
to string Christmas lights around a window or hold
decorations.
|
|   |
|
RE: VHF Antenna Question
|
Reply
|
|
by WB6BYU on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Let me add that the two radials slope downwards on my
antenna to give a better match to 50 ohms. I just soldered
the coax center conductor to some flexible wire for the
radiator and some stiff wire for the two radials so they
stick out the sides. The antenna hangs by a string tied
to the vertical wire, somewhere near the center of the
window, with the coax dropping down under the bottom of
the blinds.
|
|   |
|
RE: VHF Antenna Question
|
Reply
|
|
by WX7G on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
The ground plane configuration will have less feedline shield current but not by a lot. The dipole or the ground plane will work fine.
Another design - one that has even less feedline shield current - is a one wavelength loop fed in the center of one vertical side. The downside are the nulls in the radiation pattern.
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
Forum, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Forum Manager.
|
|
|