|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
|
1-10 of 11 messages
|
  Page 1 of 2  
Next
|
|
Nortons Law & Jackie Gleason Show
|
Reply
|
|
by K2OOG on November 7, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Few people realize Ed Norton developed the idea of the Equivalent Duality comedy routine with Jackie Gleason, many years before during the time he was a member of his local radio amateur club.
At that time Ed Norton had just started with Public Works in the sewer biz,and through a warp of time and space, he worked closely with Kirchhoff and Thevenin.
Ed was eager to develop an equivalent duality between himself and the older Thevenin, in order to provide a study aid for youngsters wishing to qualify for the Novice and General FCC ham exams.
The idea of using the dual equivalency comedy routine with Jackie Gleason occurred much later to Norton when he decided to quit his job in the sewer biz in order to go into show biz.
The answer to the question is actually "yes."
Thevenin's ideas and Norton's idea are actually duality equivalent.
This is explained in the ARRL booklet, "Hands-On Radio Experiments" by N0AX, a compilation of H. Ward Silver's recent articles in QST.
The Equivalent Duality concept means that electrical behavior can be defined in terms of current or voltage.
Other dual quantities include resistance and conductance, impedance and admitance, series and parallel, and mode and mesh. (Page 10 the Fundamentals).
These concepts apply to solid state, tubes, and hybrids, equally.
|
|   |
|
RE: Nortons Law & Jackie Gleason Show
|
Reply
|
|
by W5GNB on November 7, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
To me this post makes absolutely NO SENSE.... Am I missing something????
73's
Gary - W5GNB
|
|   |
|
RE: Nortons Law & Jackie Gleason Show
|
Reply
|
|
by N0YXB on November 7, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Makes no sense to me either. Perhaps it's a case of PWI (Posting While Intoxicated)???
|
|   |
|
RE: Nortons Law & Jackie Gleason Show
|
Reply
|
|
by K2OOG on November 7, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
This circuit analysis is very much part of ham radio today, and it included as part of the fundamentals in every ARRL Handbook in recent years, around chapter 4 or 5.
Although years ago Norton and equivalence was not mentioned in the handbook.
Times change.
|
|   |
|
RE: Nortons Law & Jackie Gleason Show
|
Reply
|
|
by K2DC on November 7, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Is there a question in there somewhere? Is there something you need help with, other than the obvious?
|
|   |
|
RE: Nortons Law & Jackie Gleason Show
|
Reply
|
|
by K0BG on November 7, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
My mother was well read, being an English major. There were a lot of things she liked about literature, and two of those were; double entendre conundrums, and ages-old adages. The one that fits here (I think she'd agree); Fool's names and fool's faces, often appear in public places.
Add yours to the HFRF list.
Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
|
|   |
|
RE: Nortons Law & Jackie Gleason Show
|
Reply
|
|
by N3OX on November 7, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
The first rule about Ed Norton is that you do not talk about Ed Norton.
|
|   |
|
RE: Nortons Law & Jackie Gleason Show
|
Reply
|
|
by K5END on November 10, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
This site is a hoot.
I'm gonna sell my TV.
This is better.
|
|   |
|
RE: Nortons Law & Jackie Gleason Show
|
Reply
|
|
by K5DVW on November 11, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Thevenin and Norton kept their resistors in different places!
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
Forum, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Forum Manager.
|
|
|