|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
| Reviews Summary for Heathkit SB-102 |
|
Reviews: 26
|
Average rating: 3.8/5
|
MSRP: $380.00
|
|
Description: 10-80 tube classic ham transceiver
|
|
More info: http://
|
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
|
You can
write your own review of the Heathkit SB-102.
|
KY4Z
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Sep 2, 2004 14:53
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
5-band HF workhorse
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
The SB-102 was my second HF rig, and the one I owned had been well built and it operated as specified. Equipped with the CW filter, it wasn't a bad rig for CW. I used a matching HD-1410 Heathkit keyer, which performed well. I had the matching speaker (which housed the power supply) and the matching VFO.
The rig seemed to put out quite a bit of heat; of course it didn't help that my second-story shack didn't have air conditioning. I worked dozens of countries with my "Benton Harbor S Line."
The heat did cause a few problems with the rubber belts used to connect the tuning shafts to the shaft of the variable caps. The rubber turned brittle over time and eventually broke. I used Superglue to repair the o-rings in a pinch (usually while chasing DX in the wee hours Zulu). I bought replacements at a local auto parts place that sold rubber o-rings. Worked fine. I later purchased an SB-101 and someone had replaced the rubber belts with a dial cord arrangement that probably lasted longer than the original belts.
A decent rig that was fairly stable once it warmed up. The 102's solid state VFO improved the SB transceiver's reputation for stability.
I wouldn't hesitate to buy one in known good condition, they're not a bad rig to use if you don't mind time-warping back to 30-year-old technology. I think if you judge it against similar offerings of that period, you'll find it wasn't so bad a rig.
|
|
WB8RKQ
|
Rating: 5/5
|
May 23, 2004 13:36
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
cool radio
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
this was my first heathkit transciver i loved it i was only 16 yrs old got it new from heathkit it was a great looking radio i think it is still the best looking ham radio ever it looks beter then a collins i think.it is a work horse radio to it has big nobs love it it is a mans radio it is fun to tune and to operate they are a great value rig you can get them cheep on ebay and allways if they dont work that good send them into R.T.O. and they will go throu the radio and fix it up for around 120 bucks now this a great deal to have a radio sent in and fixed and went all throu i think so you cant go wrong.im even thinking of buying one my self just to bring back memorys hihi.well 73 all
|
|
N4KH
|
Rating: 3/5
|
Dec 22, 2003 19:32
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Not Bad
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I owned and used a 102 for a number of years. This was my first real rig I acquired after upgrading from my novice station (a DX-60B). The one I had was supposedly built at Heathkit for a blind ham, and I purchased it from his widow. So the construction was first class.
The biggest complaint I had was with the cheap plastic dial mechanism and VFO (called an LMO by Heath as I recall). The VFO developed instability problems which I was able to mostly cure over time. But being a CW op, I didn't care for the rather loud relays and finally got rid of it at a Hamfest.
Overall, not a bad radio for sideband if you don't mind tinkering with old tube radios. Very nice looking.
|
|
K8WV
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Apr 29, 2003 23:17
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Well worth it!
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I built my 102 in early 1972 while I was in the service. I took my time and it went together perfectly. I did have one occasion to return it to Heath and when it came back they included a note congratulating me on the construction. (I had worked as an electronics tech while in college, and had previously built an SB-303.)
When properly built these were excellent radios for the day. They used the same solid state LMO as the SB-303 and the two could be connected, although the 303 served more as a remote "VFO." The 303 and 102 would not be on the same frequency using the 303 LMO to control the 102, and the 102 would not control the 303. But I could and did use the 303 to control the 102, and could work split. They made a very nice pair, and I miss them. (Ok, having a 102 AND a 303 was probably overkill.)
I replaced the pair with an Icom 740 and don't regret it at all. I suspect if I had a 102 now it wouldn't be a great as I remember it. But it was certainly worthy at the time, and a very good deal if you had the time to build them properly.
For the going price, if you are inclined to do a rebuild, I think it would make a very nice project.
|
|
KE1MB
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Feb 10, 2003 21:14
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Fun Radio
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I collect Heathkit gear. This is old but fun stuff. A heathkit is never really finished. It is a very good design on paper. But if you really want it to scream then take to it as a kit. First you will find that many of the resistors used are 20%. This adds for a lot of error. Locate the bad ones and replace them with 1% or better parts. The reason the Heathkit makes a better tube rig is because all of the tubes are cheaply found. No strange odd balls in there. I am working on a web site that will decribe my ideas and mods for the HW101 and SB102. This is a great radio if you love to work on stuff.
|
|
WR4Q
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Feb 10, 2003 19:43
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Good design!
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I was on waiting list and got mine in April 1970.
I could not solder worth a crap. Had to send it
back to Benton Harbor. They said it worked fine
and sent it back. Guess it just wanted a ride on
Rail Express. REA? The express long ago run out by UPS. They were only shipper that would insure it. Six weeks each way. This was a state of the art rig in 1970. I have 50 or 60 boatanchors from this era. Sb-102 still my favorite.
My Collins radios KWM2-A and VFO and 30-L1 and
two 51-S1 receivers are built in a MUCH MORE solid
mechanical manner. But the KWM-2A sucks on CW.
Sends a tone through the mic. The dial on the Heath actually works better than the Collins!
The problem is just a delicate adjustment on the
split washer drive and how tight it is set. The belts are crappy O rings. You have to get dial cord and little springs from auto place.
I have used mine for almost 33 years. I have replaced 1 6au6 if tube (still working but some noise) and 2 6cl6 drivers. Same finals for 33 years and still good output. Get 110W 80M CW
down to 80W on 10 meters.
I have had to have a resistor party about every
ten years. The carbon resistors go up in value.
This is critical on cathode resistors. Be sure yours are slightly (10%) lower than schematic values. The most critical are the 6hs6 rf amp
(will give low gain esp on 10 meters) and the
6au6 first if amp.
The radio is very easy to work on. It will perform
very well indeed. This radio is great for the ham
that wants to be able to maintain his own.
Only complaint I have is lack of 160 meters and
WARC bands.
73, dee wr4q
|
|
W7JOD
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Feb 6, 2003 14:59
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Very nice for the price
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I bought the kit in 1973. I enjoyed building it and have had no problem with it since. It has survived being moved all over the country and still works great. Except for the 6146 finals, it still has all of the original tubes. It took a bit of tweaking to get the dial to work smoothly, but once done it is fine. I miss having Heathkits to build.
|
|
KD2E
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Sep 10, 2002 13:31
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
beats the KWM2!!
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
This was a kit. The quality of the rig you own thus depends on who built it. The complaints about the dial, tight switch, drifting, whatever...are due to shoddy construction.
I have Heath stuff that has all the usual Heath problems. I also however, have a few that were meticulously built. These have precise tuning smooth as silk. controls that turn effortlessly, and solid as a rock operation. Taking the band coverage, cw filter, and lack of spurs on 75 meters into consideration..It has the KWM2A beat out by a wide margin.
|
|
N5UV
|
Rating: 2/5
|
Sep 7, 2002 23:25
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Use for parts
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I'll give this a "2" only because, in the hands of a good technician, this would have been a great cheapo radio. I bought one in 1992 for $100 dollars. The main reason I bought it is to get it's power supply and 2 prong Shure 444 mic for my HW-100 (see that review, it's interesting). So, expecting the receiver to be a lemon, and buying it from a ham from Greenville, TX that suddenly was unreachable after I bought it, I would say that it was almost worth the money. It did receive well, audio output was not as tinney as HW-100, but the power output voltage must have been off. I tried tinkering with the bias adjust for days and could only manage to get it over 50 watts one time. The rest of the time, I was lucky to push 7 watts. After checking the tubes with good ones from the HW-100, I pretty much gave up on it and used it for parts. Then, some locally took it off my hands for free, along with a home-brew supply that came with the HW-100. Judging from other reviews, one thing can be said about a Heathkit...it's only as good as the ham who built it.
|
|
K1JAD
|
Rating: 3/5
|
Aug 4, 2002 08:09
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Fair overall performance with a poor dial mechanism
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
As a Ham that has been inactive for more years
than I care to count, my first and only rig was an SB-102. Although I had satisfactory results with this rig as a DX'er, there are some shortcomings in the design of the SB-102 incuding the dial mechanisms which were lless than adequate for ease of operation. In addition rotating the band switch required the aid of a sledge hammer, and the knobs are flimsy. However, overall it is a fair performer. Incidently, it now lays dormant on the table in the shack waiting to pump RF into an antenna system that will hopefully be rejeuvenated in the form of a beam antenna with a TK-40 adapter that was a casualty of a violent storm that snapped the driven element guyed with a cheap rope. I have been inactive ever since. Hope to be resurrected soon.
73
K1JAD
|
|
If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews,
please email your Reviews Manager.
|
|
|
|
|
