|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
|
You can
write your own review of the eQSL.
|
K6TPL
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 13, 2008 05:24
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Will always support it 
|
Time owned: months
|
Well the only problem with it is that the ARRL has tried to destroy it. Even though eQsl was first to have it. There is no reason in the World for the ARRL to not accept eQSl" As they require proof that the people do have calls.
The ARRL looks at it as a chance to make money as if they do not make enough from their high priced membership. Yet that membership doesn't cover the QSL. And I am a member of the ARRL. But it is sad that they try and make money from the amateur community. They Tee me off~! And now if you will excuse me. 73 good bye and I am through speaking
|
|
AB4D
|
Rating: 3/5
|
Jul 13, 2008 04:37
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
So-So 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
Used Eqsl for a while but found it annoying when I started receiving eqsl requests for stations I never worked. I did not bother to even use LOTW just by reading all of the hoops you have to jump through with the ARRL I knew it would be nothing but a big PITA. I'll stick with REAL qsl cards sent by mail or through the buro.
|
|
N8YA
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 12, 2008 18:19
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Love IT! 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I have had nothing but headaches with LotW (made by engineers for engineers).
I LOVE the simplicity of eQSL. I don't care if it doesn't count for ARRL's DXCC. The DXCC is only a piece of PAPER to me! These "awards" are only PAPER, they are not made of gold or silver, so who cares!?!
I enjoy amateur radio for ME not for the ARRL! I confirm QSLs for me, not for the ARRL. I upload to LotW twice a year, I upload to eQSL after every contest because it is so easy! Just upload your ADIF file to eQSL before converting it to a TQ5 file for the LotW.
If all you are interested in is wallpaper use the LotW. If you enjoy simplicity that works,
use eQSL!
|
|
N5IVZ
|
Rating: 2/5
|
Jul 12, 2008 14:17
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Needs work on security 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
Interesting for SWLs but ham radio...no...There is nothing like a QSL via snailmail plus it counts toward ARRL Awards...
Work on the security to get rid of possible fraud...
|
|
VE3TMT
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 12, 2008 13:49
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
A great service 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I've been using eQSL for a few years now and think it is a great service. I have had custom paper QSL cards made in the past and mailed them all, so for the previous reviewer who thinks eQSL users are cheap, get a life. I wanted to sign up for LOTW but the process for non US hams is ridiculous. I think eQSL fits the bill nicely. I just wish more hams would sign up. I have at least 500 QSO's in the log from non-users. But it is a matter of choice.
|
|
WX4O
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Jul 12, 2008 13:48
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Like It 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
Flame Flame Flame. I like eQSL and also send 'real' QSLs. I don't use LOTW because it's a pain in the proverbial. PLEASE! Stay away from eQSL and keep your opinions to yourself. P.S. I've been a ham since 1969, and operated as DX from many countries.
I QSL'd all the sent QSLs to me.
|
|
W4KVW
|
Rating: 0/5
|
Jul 12, 2008 13:33
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
HAHAHAHA 
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
I kept getting emails from eQSL saying I had QSL cards but I do NOT use eQSL.SOME think this site is the BOMB but I think it's a JOKE myself.The eQSL's are NOT good for ARRL awards programs.I think MOST folks use it because they can NOT afford a REAL QSL card & the required POSTAGE needed to send them.Sounds like if that's your reason them just MAYBE your in the WRONG HOBBY!I SEND & RECEIVE only REAL QSL cards here so eQSL forget sending me those UNWANTED emails & USELESS eQSL cards PLEASE!!!!You are now on my BLOCKED email list anyway.(NO I do NOT wish to make a DONATION)
Clayton
W4KVW
|
|
WX4O
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 12, 2008 11:08
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Love it. 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I check for incomming QSLs everyday. Still have a bunch to load to the database. I have a good collection of QSLs now. I recommend it.
|
|
WE1X
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 12, 2008 08:36
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
A Compelling Alternative to LoTW 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I gave up on LoTW finding the service to be overly complex, rank amateurish (in the wrong sense of the word) and remarkably unbecoming to an organization like the ARRL.
eQSL, however, is fast, convenient, well organized and a joy to use. QSOs logged into Ham Radio Deluxe automatically and immediately are sent to eQSL for processing...making QSLing far easier and timely. For those concerned about "fraud" amateurs at both ends of the QSL process can request authentication to ensure the sending party is who he/she claims they are. Yes, as for workarounds that can compromise the merits of an award I assume that's a possibility. However, keep in mind this is only a hobby and those who want to be dishonest are going to do so.
Harry WE1X
|
|
N2UGB
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 12, 2008 07:36
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
I like it! 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
If all that matters in the world is one more award then, perhaps, another QSL-road might be taken. I am not a paper chaser. I use eQSL to say hello and thanks for the QSO. Nothing more. I get great satisfaction sending and receiving them. I've received paper QSLs in the mail that have had the contact info computer generated. Is this any better? I don't think so. But they are appreciated and direct-mail responded to.
|
|
If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews,
please email your Reviews Manager.
|
|
|
|
|