eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


Reviews Categories | QSL printers; callsign badge engravers; etc. | eQSL Help


Reviews Summary for eQSL
eQSL Reviews: 161 Average rating: 3.4/5 MSRP: $Free - Donations accepted
Description: Electronic web-based QSL exchange service
More info: http://www.eqsl.cc
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

You can write your own review of the eQSL.

<— Page 2 of 17 —>

K6TPL Rating: 5/5 Jul 13, 2008 05:24 Send this review to a friend
Will always support it  Time owned: months
Well the only problem with it is that the ARRL has tried to destroy it. Even though eQsl was first to have it. There is no reason in the World for the ARRL to not accept eQSl" As they require proof that the people do have calls.
The ARRL looks at it as a chance to make money as if they do not make enough from their high priced membership. Yet that membership doesn't cover the QSL. And I am a member of the ARRL. But it is sad that they try and make money from the amateur community. They Tee me off~! And now if you will excuse me. 73 good bye and I am through speaking
 
AB4D Rating: 3/5 Jul 13, 2008 04:37 Send this review to a friend
So-So  Time owned: more than 12 months
Used Eqsl for a while but found it annoying when I started receiving eqsl requests for stations I never worked. I did not bother to even use LOTW just by reading all of the hoops you have to jump through with the ARRL I knew it would be nothing but a big PITA. I'll stick with REAL qsl cards sent by mail or through the buro.

 
N8YA Rating: 5/5 Jul 12, 2008 18:19 Send this review to a friend
Love IT!  Time owned: more than 12 months
I have had nothing but headaches with LotW (made by engineers for engineers).

I LOVE the simplicity of eQSL. I don't care if it doesn't count for ARRL's DXCC. The DXCC is only a piece of PAPER to me! These "awards" are only PAPER, they are not made of gold or silver, so who cares!?!

I enjoy amateur radio for ME not for the ARRL! I confirm QSLs for me, not for the ARRL. I upload to LotW twice a year, I upload to eQSL after every contest because it is so easy! Just upload your ADIF file to eQSL before converting it to a TQ5 file for the LotW.

If all you are interested in is wallpaper use the LotW. If you enjoy simplicity that works,
use eQSL!
 
N5IVZ Rating: 2/5 Jul 12, 2008 14:17 Send this review to a friend
Needs work on security  Time owned: more than 12 months
Interesting for SWLs but ham radio...no...There is nothing like a QSL via snailmail plus it counts toward ARRL Awards...

Work on the security to get rid of possible fraud...

 
VE3TMT Rating: 5/5 Jul 12, 2008 13:49 Send this review to a friend
A great service  Time owned: more than 12 months
I've been using eQSL for a few years now and think it is a great service. I have had custom paper QSL cards made in the past and mailed them all, so for the previous reviewer who thinks eQSL users are cheap, get a life. I wanted to sign up for LOTW but the process for non US hams is ridiculous. I think eQSL fits the bill nicely. I just wish more hams would sign up. I have at least 500 QSO's in the log from non-users. But it is a matter of choice.
 
WX4O Rating: 4/5 Jul 12, 2008 13:48 Send this review to a friend
Like It  Time owned: more than 12 months
Flame Flame Flame. I like eQSL and also send 'real' QSLs. I don't use LOTW because it's a pain in the proverbial. PLEASE! Stay away from eQSL and keep your opinions to yourself. P.S. I've been a ham since 1969, and operated as DX from many countries.
I QSL'd all the sent QSLs to me.
 
W4KVW Rating: 0/5 Jul 12, 2008 13:33 Send this review to a friend
HAHAHAHA  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I kept getting emails from eQSL saying I had QSL cards but I do NOT use eQSL.SOME think this site is the BOMB but I think it's a JOKE myself.The eQSL's are NOT good for ARRL awards programs.I think MOST folks use it because they can NOT afford a REAL QSL card & the required POSTAGE needed to send them.Sounds like if that's your reason them just MAYBE your in the WRONG HOBBY!I SEND & RECEIVE only REAL QSL cards here so eQSL forget sending me those UNWANTED emails & USELESS eQSL cards PLEASE!!!!You are now on my BLOCKED email list anyway.(NO I do NOT wish to make a DONATION)

Clayton
W4KVW
 
WX4O Rating: 5/5 Jul 12, 2008 11:08 Send this review to a friend
Love it.  Time owned: more than 12 months
I check for incomming QSLs everyday. Still have a bunch to load to the database. I have a good collection of QSLs now. I recommend it.
 
WE1X Rating: 5/5 Jul 12, 2008 08:36 Send this review to a friend
A Compelling Alternative to LoTW  Time owned: more than 12 months
I gave up on LoTW finding the service to be overly complex, rank amateurish (in the wrong sense of the word) and remarkably unbecoming to an organization like the ARRL.

eQSL, however, is fast, convenient, well organized and a joy to use. QSOs logged into Ham Radio Deluxe automatically and immediately are sent to eQSL for processing...making QSLing far easier and timely. For those concerned about "fraud" amateurs at both ends of the QSL process can request authentication to ensure the sending party is who he/she claims they are. Yes, as for workarounds that can compromise the merits of an award I assume that's a possibility. However, keep in mind this is only a hobby and those who want to be dishonest are going to do so.

Harry WE1X
 
N2UGB Rating: 5/5 Jul 12, 2008 07:36 Send this review to a friend
I like it!  Time owned: more than 12 months
If all that matters in the world is one more award then, perhaps, another QSL-road might be taken. I am not a paper chaser. I use eQSL to say hello and thanks for the QSO. Nothing more. I get great satisfaction sending and receiving them. I've received paper QSLs in the mail that have had the contact info computer generated. Is this any better? I don't think so. But they are appreciated and direct-mail responded to.
 
<— Page 2 of 17 —>


If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews, please email your Reviews Manager.