- Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Friends Remembered
Survey Question

DX Cluster Spots

Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement

Reviews Categories | Antennas: VHF/UHF+ Directional (Yagi, quad, etc.) | Arrow Antenna 146/437-10 and 146/437-10WBP Help

Reviews Summary for Arrow Antenna 146/437-10 and 146/437-10WBP
Arrow Antenna 146/437-10 and 146/437-10WBP Reviews: 49 Average rating: 5.0/5 MSRP: $139
Description: Portable Handheld Yagi for 146/437 mhz primarily used for satellite DXing. However, it can be mounted on a camera tripod and used for groundwave communications. 10 watts maximum for handheld operation/150 w maximum when mounted. Elements are made from aluminum "arrow" shafts. Lightweight, and made for quick assembly/disassembly. Weighs about 22 oz.
Product is in production.
More info:
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.

My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

You can write your own review of the Arrow Antenna 146/437-10 and 146/437-10WBP.

Page 1 of 5 —>

K5TGS Rating: 5/5 Feb 11, 2018 08:50 Send this review to a friend
Simply the Best  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I am using this antenna for satellite communications. It is a very solid build. Works great on both vhf and uhf. I have used this with a camera tripod and handheld, either way it performs nicely. I also use the duplexer so I only have one antenna coax to my HT.

The company is also great in answering my questions, very helpful!
KD5QHB Rating: 5/5 Mar 5, 2017 18:18 Send this review to a friend
Great Antenna  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I bought amused arrow antenna. First night I got it worked two stations on 5w with FT1DR. Can't ask for more than with an antenna!! Thanks Arrow Antenna!!!
KJ4FGI Rating: 5/5 Mar 26, 2016 23:52 Send this review to a friend
My choice over the elk antenna  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
This was a tough choice, but the most rewarding choice. I Read the reviews on the elk antenna, also the YouTube videos and checked a lot of people's websites.

The reason why I chose this antenna, not only because of the fantastic reviews, but reading a lot of articles on the elk antenna, they stated you have to put a bend in the coax cable to adjust the SWR, this means every time you put the antenna together you need to check the SWR,

I didn't want to have to mess with checking the SWR after transporting and deploying it. Also this antenna is a couple of ounces lighter, not that it makes a difference holding it but if you put it on a tripod it's the counterweight.

Every time I attempted to make contact with the satellite, I succeeded. Looking at all the web reviews on this antenna it was suggested to label the elements after installation to help with future installations.

What a piece of cake you can have this antenna together in just two minutes. If you purchase this antenna you will not be sorry.
Eddie kj4fgi
W9DPY Rating: 5/5 Nov 2, 2015 11:59 Send this review to a friend
Great Antenna, Super Service  Time owned: more than 12 months
I have had my 146/437 - 10 Arrow for about 8 or 9 years. It doesn't get as much use as it did; due to the declining population of "Easy Sats". However, I do you it for the occasional BSA camp out or other mobile venture.

For me it's not just the antenna (which is just fine mechanically and electrically) but the service from Tim. About 3 months ago my antenna fell off the shelf I keep it on in the garage. All three of the 2 meter elements on the "non-stub" side broke or were bent beyond repair. I emailed Tim and asked how much for replacements. He asked what was wrong and I told him. He said "I have you covered". Less than a week later I have a box on my front porch with the three elements.

I have three Arrow products (this satellite antenna, a 2M/440 open stub J and the 3 element 2M yagi). All three work great and are well constructed. This is a great company run exactly the right way. Tim knows that customer service is paramount when you are catering to a small, specialized audience like hams. Keep up the good work!
KG5FQT Rating: 5/5 Jul 5, 2015 09:40 Send this review to a friend
Awesome!  Time owned: 3 to 6 months
Just echoing everyone else's reviews. Great antenna. Hooked up to my Baofeng HT, I easily hit Satellite when it passes over and no problem receiving on same. Just a complete night and day difference between trying to use a whip on a HT versus this antenna to hit the sats. Great purchase.
W7UFX Rating: 5/5 Oct 12, 2013 16:04 Send this review to a friend
Highly recommended  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I wanted to have a portable antenna for two reasons; I live in northwest Montana and wanted to have a decent antenna that I could break down and set up quickly when I'm out in the back country. Secondly I became interested in making contacts through SO-50 using a handheld radio.

My decision to purchase rather than build my own antenna pretty much depended on the cost of materials and the availability of tools. After reading a lot of blogs and articles on the 'net I determined that it was cheaper to purchase one instead. It then became a choice between the Arrow or the Elk. The arrow is cheaper if the duplexer was left out; I thought $59 for the duplexer was unreasonably high. There is information all over the Internet about the construction of this simple device, so I purchased the circuit board from FAR Circuits, the inductors and capacitors from Digi-Key and Newark, and a couple of BNC-BNC patch cables from Universal Radio. Total cost: about $12.
I purchased the 146/437-10BP (the split-boom model. The total cost after shipping was $94.

I received the antenna very quickly and well-packaged. As was described by other reviewers on this site, the quality of workmanship is excellent. While assembling it for the first time, I realized that I would need to take the plastic end caps off the 70cm elements and measure them with a tape measure. It would have been nice if the elements were labeled; with the red end caps installed some of the elements were measured so close to each other it was extremely difficult to determine whether it was part of director 2 or 3, 4, and 5. Directors 3, 4, and 5 are the same length, but D2 is only 1/8" longer. I printed up some cable labels at work and affixed them to the elements of my antenna. With the antenna completely broken down, inlcuding separating the boom parts, I can assemble it in under 4 minutes.
Broken down, the longest piece is 21 1/2", making it easy to stow in a backpack for portable use while hiking in the mountains.

How does it perform? I had to wait for the right opportunity for a satellite pass to occur at a reasonable time, and I am right up against the mountains so I have to have a pass to the west of me at a decent elevation since I'm surrounded by tall pine trees. Recently I had a "perfect pass"; nearly directly overhead at 2030 local time. Using my Kenwood TH-D72A I was able to work a couple of stations with excellent signal reports. I could have done a little better but I am still a "satellite n00b" and still learning how to "drive" my new handheld. The antenna has a broad enough beamwidth so your aim does not have to be perfect- it is more important to twist the antenna for proper polarization. It is amazing how twisting a few degrees can either bring the downlink signal to full-quieting or lose it entirely. Adjusting the downlink frequency for doppler shift is also critical. 5 KHz makes a huge difference in being able to receive.

I am very satisfied with this antenna, and I definately recommend it. The only criticism I have to offer is 1) The elements could be labled and 2) There is no reason why the duplexer needs to be so expensive. $20 is reasonable- $59 is just rediculous. Buy the antenna and build the duplexer yourself.
WB8RJY Rating: 5/5 Oct 1, 2013 12:39 Send this review to a friend
unbelieveable performance  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
Received it on thursday. worked many stations on friday, saturday and sunday mornings using nothing
more than a Yaesu FT 50 handheld radio !
signals were strong, noise free and received many
great signal reports.having as much fun as when i was a novice 40 years ago !shipping was very fast.
could not be happier.great product.
It assembles in less than 5 minutes !!!!
thanks you
NM3B Rating: 5/5 Aug 25, 2013 06:19 Send this review to a friend
Super Antenna  Time owned: 6 to 12 months
My XYL and I recently returned from Newfoundland/VO1 which was a vacation/Satellite DXpedition. The Arrow 146/437 was assembled before we departed the home QTH. Our vehicle is a Jeep Grand Cherokee Larado X with plenty of room for antenna and luggage. This model does not have the duplexer so use two 15 foot mini coax cables which I wire tied together forming one small coax. It takes less than 30 seconds to mount it on a camera tripod. The laptop with satellite tracking program is in back of Jeep by antenna. I worked from seven grids while in VO1 land and worked stations from Texas to Germany on all four of the active amateur satellites. To me this was quite a feat with such a small compact antenna. I have never used an Elk antenna but the way the Arrow performed have no desire to even bother with an Elk antenna to make any comparisons. The number of QSL cards I am receiving from this vacation/DXpedition speaks for itself. Anyone with any questions/comments I would be happy to reply.
KV6O Rating: 5/5 Aug 1, 2013 11:02 Send this review to a friend
Great antenna, great service.  Time owned: more than 12 months
I have two of these, one is a split boom that I purchased probably almost 10 years ago, the other is a solid boom that I won at a ham meeting, probably 6 or 7 years ago.

I have used them for sats, VHF/UHF rover ops, T-hunting - and have been very pleased with the performance and portability.

I recently ran into Arrow at a local hamfest and received above and beyond customer service for a minor issue - wasn't expecting it at all but it's nice to know the company stands behind their product - one that's many years old!
K6LCS Rating: 5/5 Jul 13, 2013 09:27 Send this review to a friend
Outstanding 2M/440 + SATS Performer  Time owned: more than 12 months
There’s plenty of “Elk vs. Arrow” debate on the ‘Net. A lot of it pure rubbish - and not written by people who have actually purchased and own both units as they make their uneducated allegations. A couple of the re-occurring themes ...

“Arrow doesn’t publish gain numbers for their antennas.” This is true. Maybe a little “arrogant” of Arrow, too (grin). But reliable test data is out there - and thousands of owners will attest that their Arrow Antennas are performing magnificently for what they were designed to do.

“The Arrow is hard to transport.” Well, I devote my entire Ford Ranger’s covered pickup bed to my Arrow when I take it places. Rarely has it been disassembled. But to make it absolutely flat, all one needs to do is unscrew the three 2M element pairs, and you have a flat plane of an antenna.

“Arrows are all engineered wrong - they cannot possibly work.” A little story for you. While working for HRO-Anaheim a few years ago, I sold an Arrow to a client for working the satellites. I had first-hand experiences with the Arrow, and therefore could wholeheartedly recommend them to others. The gentleman was waiting for me to open up the shop the next morning, with his Arrow in hand.

“I know antenna theory, and this antenna cannot possibly work - it is engineered all wrong - I want a refund!” - he demanded.

Hmmm. Part of me wanted to discover if he assembled it correctly, and whether or not he actually tested it. But the other part of me was thinking, “Well, I can purchase it myself as an open-box item ... ”

Which I did. And it is the SAME antenna that I have used the past 7+ years for EVERY demo and presentation I have given.

Moral of the story: The Arrow Antenna may not please some engineers. But it sure pleases those who desire to work the FM satellites.

“The Arrow Antenna is much heavier ... “ I have brand-new, un-opened Elk and brand-new, un-opened Arrow in my hands. The Elk package weighs 35.6 ounces. The Arrow weight 33.6 ounces. Any “weight difference issue” is, well, NOT an issue.

And on and on ... EITHER antenna is a great investment. Most of the anti-Arrow nonsense on the ‘Net remind me of while my wife was proudly carrying her Nikon F in the 1970s (arguably the most significant SLR in 35mm history), others would comment, “Oh, my Pentax / Minolta / Canon is as good as that ... “ --- But you never heard any Nikon owner state any such comparison ... (grin)

How do the Elk and Arrow compare? Both work the FM birds very well. Either make working the FM sats feel like “cheating” - the gain is that dramatic over any HT whip improvements you might make.

But from someone who has purchased both and has used them both, the Arrow “senses” the initial capturing of a sat’s signal more definitively than the Elk does. I mean, in front of darned near every audience, I’ll declare, “There it is!” - when those close to me don’t hear anything of note. But that slight “dip” in the background noise ... no SWR meter can detect it ... you can just hear the beginning of capturing the signal better with the Arrow than with the Elk. This is NOT a scientific conclusion - just my personal observation after working the sats for several years with both antennas.

Wonderful products from Arrow, indeed.
Page 1 of 5 —>

If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews, please email your Reviews Manager.