- Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Friends Remembered
Survey Question

DX Cluster Spots

Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement

Reviews Categories | Receivers: General Coverage | Hammarlund HQ100 Help

Reviews Summary for Hammarlund HQ100
Hammarlund HQ100 Reviews: 13 Average rating: 4.3/5 MSRP: $160.00
Description: General Coverage Receiver 500 KC - 30 MC
Product is not in production.
More info: http://
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.

My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

You can write your own review of the Hammarlund HQ100.

Page 1 of 2 —>

N2KPE Rating: 4/5 Jan 5, 2012 17:57 Send this review to a friend
Great Classic Looks  Time owned: more than 12 months
PLEASE NOTE: many of the reviews here are for the HQ-100A, NOT the HQ-100, which does NOT have a BFO. That said, I;ve had mine for at least 20 years. I haven't used it for a long time, but recently fired it up. It has no upgrades, but I was amazed at how well it works considering. Add to the performance is a really great classic look.
N6SFC Rating: 2/5 Mar 13, 2011 03:16 Send this review to a friend
NEEDS FUSE  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I just brought this little beauty home from the hamfest and opened it up to find black stuff splattered all over the place under the chassis around the power transformer. For some reason, Hammarlund decided to save 50 cents and not put a fuse in the power line. How sad.

I strongly advise all HQ-100/HQ-100A owners to fuse the hot side of your line cord with a 1 amp slo-blo fuse. Since those line cords are 2-wire and non polarized, it would also be a great idea to remove the entire line cord and replace it with a 3-wire 18 gauge molded cord set. You'll need to ream out the hole to 1/2" and install a larger strain relief. There is plenty of room next to the line cord entry to install a panel mounted fuse holder.

My heart sank when I saw that fire damage inside this otherwise nice radio. Don't let this happen to you. It could burn your house down, too. FUSE IT OR LOSE IT!
KD0JRG Rating: 5/5 Feb 4, 2011 09:15 Send this review to a friend
it's a keeper  Time owned: more than 12 months
After 30 years away from the SWL hobby I decided to get a tube radio and pick up where I left off. I liked the good looks of the Hammarlund and was confident HQ-100A circuits would have performance to match. I won mine on ebay.
Even as I unwrapped it I could see the classic good looks. But would it perform? In initial testing it was dead on frequencies over 25 mHz and performance was poor in all major aspects. Re-soldering all joints associated with the 10-30 Mc LO tank circuit solved the first problem. The remaining issues came from severe misalignment, evidently by a previous owner. Following manufacture's instructions, I aligned all tanks with the aid of an HP-8640B, a General Radio 1840A and non-metallic tools.
The results were very pleasing. After wards just .5 uv yielded a 6db S+N/N ratio and image rejection came in around 30 db. Variable IF selectivity (with the Q-multiplier) was from .3 to 3kHz. Fixed IF selectivity was 6kHz. All this was done in 2006 and no alignment has been needed since. I did replace one gassy tube in 2010.
So, back to the performance question. In casual DX'ing I have heard 29 countries using an attic dipole. After thorough warm-up SSB is excellent and essentially drift free provided the radio is placed on a firm surface. In fact, thus far, anything I have heard on my more modern SSB rig has also been heard on the Hammarlund when I have cross checked the two. Others have mentioned the rich audio and I certainly agree.
In conclusion, this is my daily user for BC AM and SW DX as well as a spotter and monitor for SSB. Simply put, if you see this radio on the market, it's only because it is part of my estate!
W3QY Rating: 5/5 Jul 6, 2009 12:27 Send this review to a friend
very good ol' timer  Time owned: more than 12 months
I got my HQ-100A several years ago, almost mint condition, with the manual and even have the original box (albeit a bit worn). It's been my daily user when I'm home, mostly for the AM band.. it has nice tube audio. Everything works as laid out..even my clock/timer.. and except for just a slight tinge of yellowing on the bandspread dial it has that "out of the box" look. Mine was apparently used by the US government as the manual has a gov't stamp dated
"Sept.30, 1965.
A few minutes of warmup and it's stable..wanted one as a young ham back in 1965. I enjoy it everyday..the first day I brought it home (it was early morning as I recall) I hooked a piece of wire to the antenna terminals, plugged in my headphones and tuned to the low end of 40m CW where I heard one hellacious pileup for a semi-rare DX station in the Pacific..I heard him quite well with a few feet of wire.
Don't know that I'll part with it anytime soon..
W3DBJ Rating: 5/5 Jul 6, 2009 10:55 Send this review to a friend
Good bang for the boatanchor buck  Time owned: 3 to 6 months
The BFO is a little weak, but with a few minor changes, is a great workable rx solution for SSB/CW.

AM performance, with the matching speaker, is phenomenal, one of the best rigs for audio quality I've had the pleasure of owning.
K1FPV Rating: 5/5 Oct 21, 2008 10:51 Send this review to a friend
Good RX in its day!  Time owned: more than 12 months
Got one in 1963 when I upgraded from Novice to General. Wish I kept it! I can't figure out OLDSWAB's problem. I suspect he didn't have a manual. The RX didn't have a BFO per say. You used the Q-Multiplier as a BFO by making it regenerative. You varied the amount of regeneration with signal strength to prevent overload and audio distortion.

At any rate, I bought an old one on eBay over a year ago that didn't work. Replaced an IF transformer a bunch of caps and resistors along with a tube or 2 and BINGO, it works like new! I find it very pleasurable listening to the BC band and some of the short-wave BC stations. I'm also using it in my boat anchor setup with an HT-40 on AM.

It is still a great receiver!
K5ENA Rating: 5/5 Oct 20, 2008 09:07 Send this review to a friend
Great  Time owned: more than 12 months
I had an HQ-100 as my Novice receiver in 1960. A vast improvement over my National SW-54 I used before I got my ticket. Excellent receiver for its day. The HQ-100 and DX-20 was my Novice station.

N4AUD Rating: 4/5 Mar 21, 2008 19:41 Send this review to a friend
Good receiver  Time owned: more than 12 months
My HQ-100A is a fine receiver, especially for SW listening. AM is great right off the bat, it needs to warm up a while and stop drifting for CW/SSB use. That's what the clock is supposed to be for, BTW, but I have never used it that way. Good audio, everything works like it's supposed to work. I really can't find fault with it. It's not a modern solid state digital wonder, but that's exactly why I bought it. Good sensitivity, good selectivity when you use the controls properly and let it warm up properly.
KA6OTJ Rating: 4/5 Dec 22, 2007 13:01 Send this review to a friend
very good for its time  Time owned: more than 12 months
I also own an HQ-100 which I recieved new in 1957. Yep over 50 years old. It cost $169.00 (on special) I specificly remember not being able to afford the extra $9.95 for the clock since I chose to get the matching speaker which was $14.95. This receiver is what sparked my interest in Ham radio and to chase the dream of one day becoming a ham which of course I did. The radio still works and I have never replaced any tubes or part in it. It is due for a good alignment becuase it is starting to drift quite a bit which indcates a tube problem but over all it has been a great radio for me and compares favorably with my Yaesu FRG-7. If you are a boat anchor kind of guy you will enjoy this rig also.
W2WHT Rating: 5/5 Dec 21, 2007 09:12 Send this review to a friend
an old friend  Time owned: more than 12 months
I have had my HQ-100C for over 30 years. I finally had it "tuned up" last year. It is a solid, decently sensitive and easy to use unit. I have had to replace only a couple of tubes after all this time. I have used this unit for DX and ham listening. Once warmed up, it is very stable and does not drift. The analog tuning actually makes scanning a band much easier, and you can pick out distant signals far easier than you can with some of the current $100-$200 shortwave receivers on the market. This unit harkens from the early 60ís, and is completely US made.
For what I have paid, I have gotten many times my investment in return. I would choose to continue to own this unit even if I had newer and far "better" receivers (which I do). Maybe becoming familiar with an old tube type receiver makes you come to respect the history and heritage of worldwide and ham radio all the more.
Page 1 of 2 —>

If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews, please email your Reviews Manager.