eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


Reviews Categories | Microphones | RadioShack Foam WindScreen #33-4001 Help


Reviews Summary for RadioShack Foam WindScreen #33-4001
RadioShack Foam WindScreen #33-4001 Reviews: 4 Average rating: 2.3/5 MSRP: $3.99
Description: Microphone Foam Windscreen for larger microphone head fits over mic head to help cut breath sounds and wind noise.
Product is in production.
More info: http://www.radioshack.com
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

You can write your own review of the RadioShack Foam WindScreen #33-4001.

K9FON Rating: 0/5 Nov 9, 2008 16:42 Send this review to a friend
Sucks!  Time owned: more than 12 months
Made my audio sound worse than without the windscreen. One day, i accidently dropped it on the floor and my Cocker Spaniel chewed it to pieces! Oh well, no big lost.
 
KC9GUZ Rating: 5/5 Jan 25, 2008 17:20 Send this review to a friend
no gripes here  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I got one of these windscreen to use with my 33-3042 Radio Shack vocal mike hooked to a Kenwood TS 830S. I have not noticed any articulation loss at all. Maybe the other reviewers were just overly picky audiophiles? I have gotten nothing but great audio reports from most everyone i talk to. No problems here!
 
WB5TVI Rating: 2/5 Feb 25, 2002 08:25 Send this review to a friend
Articulation Loss  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I totally agree with WV4R. After putting the windscreen on my Heil Goldline Microphone, I noticed a loss of quality in the monitor. I did the on / off test to verify...yes, this thing should be called a speech destroyer. After reading WV4R's review I did the wash test and guess what...a sink full of black dye/paint. After drying, it does sound better. However, I'm off to the music store to find a less dampening solution.

73,
Don WB5TVI
 
WV4R Rating: 2/5 Feb 24, 2002 20:24 Send this review to a friend
Once again... you May get what you pay for...  Time owned: 3 to 6 months
Recently in my pursuit of amateur audio excellence, I purchased a new 'studio style' microphone. When I opened the box I noticed there was No protective windscreen included to protect it from the ravages of use. I perused a number of sources and noted price variations of an amazing magnitude from 2.99 to 49.99! Reluctantly I opened my RatShack catalog and voila.. there were Three from which to choose... and all under $5... So... I dashed off to the local RatShack to pick up a simple foam windscreen.

Getting it on my mic was a bit of a tight fit even though it was Described to be for Larger mics.

On Air testing confirmed a bit of articulation lost through the foam... Not quite transparent.

After cookies & milk, on the air, I noticed the screen was collecting spittle, cookie crumbs and unknown 'stuff' so I pried it off the mic and soaked it in warm water and anti-bacterial soap to clean it up.

I really started to scramble for the rinse water when it started to really Bleed... yes... Bleed! It was a good thing I was using the kitchen sink because the amount of dye that leached out blackened the sink And my hands and I was afraid it might be permanent stuff! I lucked out and the thick black stuff washed off the sink and my hands with dish washing detergent.

After air drying it overnight, I put it back on the mic and my audio reports Improved!

The foam is thick. The fit is tight. the stain is temporary. The price is relatively cheap.

I couldn't help wondering what the Real use of this foam was before RatShack shaped it and called it a microphone screen.

After a bit of soul searching, I will give it a (Needs Help) 2/5... only because of the price And because the stain finally did wash off.

73 es God bless, murf/wv4r
 


If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews, please email your Reviews Manager.