|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
|
You can
write your own review of the Heathkit HR-1680.
|
N0XE
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jun 28, 2009 19:56
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
AM no Problem
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I have had many SSB,CW only radios over the years that I listen to AM on just fine. This radio should be no different and is a pretty decent receiver even today , careful tuning and zero beating and you can copy AM just fine. NO it will not have great wide bandwidth quality like you find on some nice old Boat Anchor but perfectly usable. Zero in on WWV with any of SSB only rigs and test it, or any of the AM power house broadcast stations on 40 meters some night, works fine. In fact some hams have checked in to SSB nets while TX on AM making sure they were perfectly zero beat and many times the SSB station net control never even new they were actually on AM. Yes if they moved a tad off freq you would notice the carrier, but my point it works and it has been done many times and been a part of ham radio for ages, The HR-1680 can be used with your DX 60, or any other AM TX and will get the job done, you just may not like the way AM sounds on SSB, but for CW and AM communications it will be good enough, 73 Jim N0XE
|
|
WB1PIX
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jun 28, 2009 19:03
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Built like a tank
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
I bought the HR-1680 used for $30 from an estate. The original owner had passed away. He noted on the manual that the unit was built in April 1978. Strange thing is - even though he passed away he left the unit perfectly calibrated and the tuning dial calibrated dead-nuts on - as if he knew he had to get it ready for the next person (me??).
I bought an adapter to get my coax (attached to a wire dipole) to plug into the phono plug on the back of the receiver. I also connected some computer speakers because my first test with headphones - I found some of the crackles, pops and tones were hard to take through the headphones. The speakers mellowed it out.
Needless to say, this receiver has a better, cleaner receive than my Kenwood TS-570D. My theory is, if someone is willing to put the work into building a kit they'd better get a damn good radio out of it and this is truly a great receiver.
The tuning dial is as smooth as butter. A very slow, progressive tune. Signals are tuned in very well with little background noise. If there's an adjacent signal, the preselector helps get rid of it.
The "function" allows to pick between wide, narrow and calibrated. The narrow is probably good for CW. As I listen to SSB, I keep the function on "wide".
I put the RF gain on full, the AF gain at 50 percent and the PC speakers at 50 percent. Everything just feels perfectly calibrated (almost spookily so).
The red light up on the dial and S-meter is pretty cool. Great for late night listening. The case is very heavy (the unit weighs about 10 pounds) and it has that cool Heathkit paint job which is hard to beat.
All in all, this is a very good receiver. I plan to take it out on my screened-in porch and hook up an 80 meter dipole in the back yard and do some late night, almost in the dark listening.
During the day I listen to 20 meters while I'm working. I can really appreciate listening to some good operators who have a good voice tonality, good manners and good operating technique.
All told, if you can get this unit used as a "vintage" listening station, I would say go for it. I'm going to try to get the HR-1681 transmitter at some point.
|
|
N6KYS
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Feb 10, 2007 20:06
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Not bad for its age
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I built this rig once it was offered as the replacement for the HR-10B, and enjoyed it back then. Since then (the 1970's), I've owned several, and all have worked well. Not the most sensitive receivers ever built, and quite lacking in features even for its day, but it was a very good receiver for the intended user.....the Novice to General CW/SSB operator. One thing that was very strange was that Heath made its companion transmitter, the HX-1681, just a CW transmitter......thereby not even taking full advantage of the features (SSB) designed into the HR-1680 receiver. Also, the HR-1680 couldn't receive Am signals alone, which was disappointing, and since the HR-10B was such a poor receiver, the HR-1680 one would have been a good companion to the DX-60B transmitter if it could have received AM. Overall, not a bad receiver, if you can find one for a bargain. One thing though.....one of the solid state devices that had its own heat sink, and I can't remember which one it was (something in the audio amplification comes to mind), got very hot during operation, and would fail at times. Some modification ideas were placed out into the ham community, so try and dig up what that mod was, and do it.....it will save you some grief later.
|
|
K6WHP
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Jan 22, 2007 16:09
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Surprising for an "older" radio
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
Never owned one of these but got to use one one afternoon and I was impressed. Mainly, because there's acres of space inside the radio and -- like the K2 -- if you build it (or have the assembly/operation manual) you can service it. The only drawback is that the original configuration has the old, hot dial lights near the VFO causing drift. The going advice is to replace them with LEDs and save the heartache.
..anyone out there got a 1680 they want to part with?
|
|
M0WQR
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Jan 16, 2007 09:01
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Good Old Work Horse
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
Bought mine new at Benton Harbor in the 1970's. It has never failed. Has excellent sensitivity and has been used for cw mostly. And just keeps working.
|
|
WA3SIMI
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Feb 24, 2004 13:50
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
great sensitivity
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I bought and built this about 25 years ago. I got back into the hobby and fired this thing up.
It has excellent sensitivity, and I prefer the audio on this relic to my brand new state of the art Yaesu transceiver!
After a few minutes of "warm-up" (solid state) it is very stable.
Only problem: the front end will oscillate if the antenna impedance is too high.
|
|
VR2XMQ
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Nov 9, 2003 06:22
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Good Receiver
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
This was an unexpected surprise. A friend sent one to me after he bought it on Ebay for about $65.00 with the matching speaker. He thought it was a general coverage and did not realize it was a ham band only rx.
I was surprised by the audio and quality of the rx, a good standby rx and it looks great! analogue orange dial and S meter. It's looks are similar to the SB-104.
A good standby receiver to have around.
|
|
K6ZL
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Aug 21, 2003 02:58
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Receiver with a surprise
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
|
I bought mine off of E-bay, on a whim. 'Cause it was cheap ($60.00) had nothing to do with it! After cleaning the "plug in, plug out" cards it took right off. Stable, and sounds very good. All I did, was parallel a 6mfd cap with the existing avc cap, to give it slower avc. For a plain vanilla Heathkit (you really don't expect that much) This is a Nice radio. I'm glad I own it. Beware CW/SSB only, no AM detector.
|
|
If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews,
please email your Reviews Manager.
|
|
|
|
|
