|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
| Reviews Summary for ICOM IC-R75 |
|
You can
write your own review of the ICOM IC-R75.
|
KB6HRT
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 25, 2008 09:00
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Winner
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
|
Been around radio a long time, The R75 is a Winner in my book! Have an ICOM 756Pro3 and the R75, use the Pro to spot the stations I want to find then the R75 to lissen. Between the two radios and 4 antennas and a Clear Speech speaker it give me some good combos to pullin those stations well under most conditions....KB6HRT
|
|
NH7PG
|
Rating: 5/5
|
May 30, 2008 10:50
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Not quite a bargain
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
|
I recently had an opportunity to "test drive" this receiver at a friend's house. Aside from the extended coverage to 60 MHz (where all you're really going to hear is the occasional 6 meter geek) I really don't see much difference between this radio and the receive functions of the Icom 718. If you really must have that pathetic little strip of VHF coverage, then by all means the R 75 is a great receiver. If not, then save yourself $100, buy a 718, and get a great receiver AND a transmitter in one.
|
|
KC2OYZ
|
Rating: 2/5
|
May 10, 2008 19:01
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Not a fan
|
Time owned: 6 to 12 months
|
I have owned 2 R75's - and sold them both out of frustration. (First time I thought maybe I had a bad one or I was having a bad day.) I think it's a very over-rated and over-priced radio - the nice things about the R75 are that it looks cool, the egronomics are pretty good, and it has a lot of the features of high end RX's - too bad those features are pretty useless.
First off, everything you've heard about the R75 being very sensitive is true. Problem is, it is also very sensitive to its own noise, and to any adjacent signal or noise within 20 or 30 khz of your tuned frequency. If the sync-lock actually worked, this would not be such a big problem - but as is very well known, it hardly works at all. And even after the Kiwa mods, it still doesn't work very well.
A noise blocker that did something, and a noise reduction circuit that eliminated noise without badly distorting signals might also help to make this radio a more pleasant experience - but alas, the engineers (or hacks) who designed this radio weren't concerned with that.
100 memories with no pages and 8 character alpha tags that are not worth the effort it takes to set them is another highlight of this clunker.
You can also add to the list an AGC which is way too fast, and tinny, muddy audio...
Now, I know there are those of you who will counter that many of the shortcomings of the R75 can be alleviated to some extent with some mods and filters and very careful use of the PBT etc.
That is indeed very true - so if you like spending $800 or $900 on a radio and spending hours tweaking the settings (many of which cannot be saved in memory for a given frequency) until you find exactly the right balance necessary to isolate that weak signal (if it isn't gone by then), then go for an R75. However, if you want to spend $450 and enjoy a radio that puts the R75 to shame in most categories, (unless you need to hear TV sound and 6 meters) then buy an Eton E1. Or you go for the Palstar R30 for $600+, or spend the big bucks and get your money's worth with an AOR 7030. And if you want to spend $150 and enjoy a very nice, quiet, sensitive portable with a nice feel and great audio that outperforms the R75, try a Grundig G5. And you always have old reliable, the Sony 7600GR. Or, as someone reviewing the Keito 2100 suggested, sell your R75 (to someone who hasn't read this review) and buy the Keito.
|
|
KPAX2
|
Rating: 1/5
|
Dec 24, 2007 01:21
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
SO-SO- Not the Greatest.
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I bought one 6 years ago on Ebay- It came with the SPEECH Board and the UT-106 DSP Board. $400.00
I used it with my ICOM 718 Transceiver, The ICOM R-75 is okay as a receiver should go. But if you don't put Filters in it you'll be disappointed. You can hear background noise and other stations constantly swamping it out, bleed over- YUK!
The receiver has a High Background noise that can not be tuned-out, probably from the receiver noise itself. You can move the Notch to lower the Frequency so it doesn't destroy your hearing.
"S" meter is Disgusting, I need a Needle (Analog) There's very Poor AGC, needs to be slowed down.
The DSP UT-106 is very poor. It works, but it's a Non-Tuneable Notch. It's too sharp, You can hear Artifacts in it, very annoying if you leave it on.
The Noise Blanker works on Flourescent Lights, That's it, I got better way, shut the light off.
The DSP Board is the worst design possible. You can't control it, I bought an older R70 - Sold the R75 like I said.
The R-70 has 20 year old technolgy, and beats this R75 Hands down! Sold the UT-106 Board and the Speech board Seperately, got $725.00 for everything.
The SYNC-AM doesn't work on any of these receivers either, poorly built and hurried up to meet ICOM sales deadlines.
It's a Toy that ICOM didn't design right.
I call it JUNK........Not even Entry Level, get an ICOM R70 Receiver, it's laboratory Quality!
The R75 came out after ICOM Sold to the Chinese, the JAPS built a better radio 25 years ago!
Merry Christams, I gotta tell you the truth.
|
|
73383
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Dec 23, 2007 21:07
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Great Receiver
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I've owned the R-75 for 3-4 years and think it works quite well. I use it to scan aviation HF frequencies and had to put a broadcast band filter at the antenna input to eliminate interference from nearby BCB stations. I have it connected to an end-fed antenna with an MLB-1 from Palomar Engineers.
The R-75 is quite easy to manually setup and program but there is plenty of software out there to make programming and running even easier. I use Icom's RS-R75 software, Ham Radio Deluxe, which I customized for the receiver, and R75 Programmer by Guindasoft (http://guindasoft.impreseweb.com/radio/radio.html).
|
|
K2VI
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Nov 25, 2007 16:23
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
top end reciever
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
The reciever is almost as good as my proIII,So easy to operate i can navigate this rig in the dark.Handsome rugged design,I hope icom keeps making theese recievers because there is not many good ones around.
|
|
KC9KTI
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Oct 7, 2007 04:04
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Great!
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
Can't complain about this little gem. I used to have an Icom R71-A that I loved and from there went to a Drake R8B. The drake was nice, but not my kind of radio for some reason, so I sold it on Ebay and with half the money bought a new R75. I love it, it is my main receiver. You can't go wrong here, I use it to receive PSK as well!
|
|
DAVIDVD59
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 22, 2007 21:15
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
very good
|
Time owned: 3 to 6 months
|
|
I really like the Icom R75, the features of dual passband tuning, automatic notch filter and a working noise blanker with dual preamps make this radio perfect for me. The one negative I do not like is when the noise blanker is on, it can distort strong am and ssb signals. The preamps give me the options when I take the radio portable with me so I can use a whip antenna and get good reception on the amateur bands. I liked the radio so much I bought two, and would buy a third if I could. I have owned Kenwood R5000, R2000, R1000, and an Icom R71 and the Yaesu Frg 100. My favorite of all these radios is the Icom R75. As for the negatives listed by other people, those issues do not bother me at all, after 30+ years of swl, I really enjoy the radio, and I am sorry to hear Icom discontinued it without planning a new radio.
|
|
AD4C2006
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Apr 30, 2007 17:10
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Great radio
|
Time owned: 6 to 12 months
|
I do have my R75A for six months now and with a 50 feet loop within the bedroom around the walls at 10 feet high ending in a 10 to 1 balun,I can receive stations that even my Pro3 never could receive with the outdoor antenna,wondering why that happened,moved the Pro3 to the bedroom and used the same loop and guess what? A/B switching from one radio to the other,the station from Europe on 40M was received equally the same on both,in terms of sensibility and audio quality both radios are the same,onlything the Pro3 is a winner is the selectivity the Pro3 has using the DSP filtering.
The noise floor in this receiver is as low as the Pro3,stability the same as a new professional radio,it will not move a Hz after hours of operation,at least if it did,my ears could not listen any drift at all.
I payed just $350 for mine second hand but in mint condition and its a keeper for me,possibly will install the wide 3.3 Khz filter for ESSB,always is good to have a secundary receiver for testing all your radios.I have had several receivers in the past like the Kenwood R2000 and the IC-R71A and also the Grundig 800,but this one is the winner,althought I would like to see a separate key to chose VFO A/B selection,its very convenient to have it.One more thing the noise blanker is very effective and it don't add any distorsion in the received audio,like others has said If you see one for a decent price,don't hesitate,go and get it for you.
Hector
AD4C
Lake Worth,FL
|
|
ALANWONG1
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Apr 12, 2007 22:58
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Go and Buy It!
|
Time owned: 3 to 6 months
|
To those future new owners of this receiver, please bear in mind the R75 requires modification to its Sync Detector if you use it regularly for SWL like myself....
I've opted to use the Rado V2.0 Mod Kit where you can get it from SWL-Remote...
If you don't have electronic bldg. skills, like myself, you can opt to seek the services of a PCB Repair Technician whom can do all of the required soldering works and uplifting of the Motorola IC pin....
Moreover, you can get further assistance from R75 Yahoo Group, especially from Dr Phil and other kind members...
Finally, if you require a higher dynamic range, Dr Phil has recommended its Phil's Fidelity Mod where you can either do it yourself or ask the same PCB technician to carry it out...
In summary, go and get the R75 before its Sync Detector chip is omitted in future batches of production...
|
|
If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews,
please email your Reviews Manager.
|
|
|
|
|
