- Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Friends Remembered
Survey Question

DX Cluster Spots

Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement

Reviews Categories | Receivers: General Coverage | ICOM IC-R75 Help

Reviews Summary for ICOM IC-R75
ICOM IC-R75 Reviews: 83 Average rating: 4.5/5 MSRP: $570.
Description: Desktop Communications Receiver
Product is in production.
More info:
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.

My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

You can write your own review of the ICOM IC-R75.

<— Page 2 of 9 —>

DXTUNER Rating: 5/5 Sep 9, 2012 13:25 Send this review to a friend
Good for VHF low band Dx'ing  Time owned: more than 12 months
My opinion of the IC-R75 hasn't changed in the past 5 years - its still my all-time favorite. The 2 things keeping me attracted to it are (a.) the extended coverage, i.e. 30 kHz - 60 MHz, i.e. more Dx'ing fun if one gets temporarily bored with HF, and (b.) advanced controls which really facilitate weak signal Dx'ing, i.e. twin passband tuning and, if the situation requires, adjustable DSP function and separate built-in preamps. Oh sure, the audio isn't like grandpa's old tube radio, but one thing you can't deny its sharp and clear. There's never an issue with intelligibility.

Recently I've discovered that the IC-R75 is great for VHF-low band Dx'ing. I found that out by chance, the other night while tuning through. I got police transmissions on a 42 MHz frequency I wasn't familiar with. When I looked up the FCC call sign I was shocked: Missouri State Highway Patrol - I am in eastern Virginia. Since then I've gone back nightly and have received Pennsylvania, and various other (yet) UNID local agencies which aren't local. So folks, don't dismiss the VHF-low band. Use the IC-R75 to Dx it. You might get a pleasant surprise.

I'd like to mention the receiver's MW Dx'ing ability by saying this: It doesn't need Kiwa modifications. The stock unit is really good on MW, the internal attenuation pad is literally nothing. Sure, you can open the radio and bypass it, but there won't be a noticeable improvement in MW Dx'ing range if any. I've had a Kiwa modified IC-R75 before and I could not tell the difference between it and stock. The radio is fine the way it is, I dare say real good.

In short I can always get something on the IC-R75 that I can't get on another general coverage receiver. More fun. Whether or not its $700 worth of fun is something you need to debate with yourself.
WB3IGR Rating: 5/5 Jun 24, 2012 09:18 Send this review to a friend
Great Receiver!  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
Had my R-75 for a few weeks now. I have it on a discone antenna and a short wire antenna. Both work great even though the discone antenna only goes down as far as 25 mhz. and the wire is inside the shack. It still receives rather well all the way down to 160 meters and the AM broadcast band. I like the 2 preamps and the 2 antenna ports switchable from the front panel. A real plus for this receiver. And it can be controlled via computer. I use HRD+ DM780 for excellent RX on digital modes or with out DM 780 for mouse tuning on my computer screen!
JRT3 Rating: 5/5 Mar 20, 2012 05:43 Send this review to a friend
Great radio!  Time owned: 3 to 6 months
I bought an Icom R70 when they first came out - but sold it and upgraded to the JRC NRD-525 - then Drake R8 - as they became available. I added a Lowe HF-150 over a decade ago - and a Palstar R30A over three years back. I finally bought an older R-75 - which included the AM sync detector - at the end of last year. It immediately impressed me. It quickly replaced the Palstar, except for the local listening on MW. My NRD-525/R8/HF-150 sit on a shelf unused for now. My only antenna now, my 'farm' now all-but-barren, is a Pixel DX Pro-1a.

The bare R75 is a great DX receiver - not quite to my much modded NRD-525 - but some better filters in AM mode would fix that. The NB & NR works well, too. On MW, it is at least as sensitive as the R30A - and that's bare (pre-amps off). My biggest complaint - it runs warm with the included AD-55A power supply - rated at 16V DC @ 1.5A, although it registers 19.2V DC open load. I have since bought a heavy duty (5A) 12V DC cord and size 'Q' adapter from RS - and use it plugged in a 12V 'Jump Start' from Harbor Freight (Sale - $30), which includes a 12V 17 A-Hr battery, meter, and charging circuit. It runs 10-12 hr before dropping to 11.4V and requiring recharge (The R30A runs 20 hr.). On DC, it runs room temp. It takes 1/4" mono/stereo phones.I'd rate it - bare - as a far better buy than the $100 more Palstar. Also, it comes with a great manual - and schematic - and has available a service manual, also a consideration. Whatever you do, use a decent speaker or headphones!
KC9KTI Rating: 5/5 Dec 21, 2011 06:54 Send this review to a friend
Great receiver  Time owned: more than 12 months
I'm not going to re-hash previous reviews, just going to say I love this radio. I have been a radio junkie all my life and have owned the Icom R71-a and Drake R8b to name a couple. This little radio is outstanding and rivals more expensive models. This actually replaced the Drake in my shack as I found the Drake not personally user friendly.
AUSSIE Rating: 5/5 Dec 11, 2011 01:09 Send this review to a friend
Excellent Radio  Time owned: 6 to 12 months
I go 2 Icom-R75 only one with the dsp unit both perform excellent on hf mainly monitor utilities,
aero antennas are Wellbrook-ALA1530,1530L,330S do have other hf receivers from Aor,Alinco,Palstar,
Ten Tec all these other radios performance is equal if u havent got a decent antenna u are not going to get anywhere on hf...
K6HOM Rating: 5/5 Sep 5, 2011 16:49 Send this review to a friend
Kiwa Mods Give Excellent AM BCB Performance  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
My R75 is a relatively recently purchased pre-owned unit w/AM synch and UT-106 DSP that I immediately sent for the full Kiwa upgrades (AM synch detect. upgrade, audio upgrade, BCB attenuation removal & 6 kHz filter). I have no experience with the stock R75.

When not hamming, I enjoy AM-BCB DX and have used a Drake R8A for many years in this pursuit. I wanted a Kiwa R75 for its AM-BCB DX potential. First, a UT-106 R75 is one of the few affordable radios with built-in DSP that will operate at MW frequencies. Potentially a real advantage. Second, removal of the R75's BCB attenuation allows both its Preamps 1 and 2 to operate at these frequencies, reportedly yielding exceptional sensitivity.

So how well does all of this work?
1. BCB sensitivity is excellent. It is beneficial to be able to choose between two levels of preamplification. Preamp 2 can introduce some images from strong local AM stations. In my case not many and not present all of the time, but they can occasionally be heard. I have not found this to be a major issue so far.

2. Kiwa’s AM synch detector is very good. I don’t use this feature very often, mostly when listening to a far away ball game, but the price of this upgrade is nominal. Locks on to most weak signals, for those weaker signals where it fails to lock, my R8A synch detector also fails to lock.

3. Filters. Related to (2), my experience is that AM-BCB DX is usually better-accomplished with ECSS detection than with a AM synch detector (haven’t experienced a Sherwood SE-3 yet). Initial AM-BCB ECSS performance with the Kiwa R75 made me wish for different filter options. The stock R75 filters yield AM bandwidths of 15, 6, & 2.4 kHz. The current Kiwa filter adds another 6 kHz option. [Some say that the OEM 6 kHz filter is closer to 8 kHz, the Kiwa is supposed to truly be a 6 kHz filter. I didn’t experience a huge difference.] I found these options to be either too wide or too narrow for good ECSS. I recently swapped the Kiwa 6 kHz filter for a Icom FL-257 (3.3 kHz). I’m a happy camper now, this new filter is also a good “wide” SSB option.
[Please note that the original Kiwa mod added a high quality 3.8 kHz filter. Kiwa no longer has a source for these filters and now adds a 6 kHz filter if the “Kiwa Filter” upgrade is ordered.]

4. Audio. Most of my listening is via headphones and my R75 is connected to an old stereo receiver & speakers via the Record (Out) jack. Good audio. The native tonal balance has a bit more treble compared to the richer tonal balance of my R8A. Through headphones, I prefer the R75 audio because the intelligibility of weak stations is usually better.

5. DSP performance is not as good as I had hoped. The noise reduction is modest before the DSP begins reducing readability. Still, a significant improvement though. While an unfair comparison, the DSP on my Icom 756 Pro yields much better performance on equivalent signals, same antenna.

6. Terrific SSB performance. Through the same antenna, the R75 hears everything that my 756 Pro does.

7. Ergonomics. I like the way that the R75 controls operate. Very nice weighted tuning knob, positive action keys, no menus really needed once you set up the radio to your liking. Nice display, compact size, very good build quality. As much as I hate to say this, I prefer the controls of this radio over my R8A. (i.e. spongy numeric keypad that often is non-responsive to keystrokes, cheap tuning knob with no “feel”).

Overall, I am quite pleased with the performance of this radio. It delivers excellent performance.
NW8Z Rating: 5/5 Feb 23, 2011 17:30 Send this review to a friend
Best Receiver for the money out there!!  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I love this receiver for the price you can't beat it!!

You can combine filters and add new ones if you wish.

I just installed a Murata filter 3Khz 455Khz and it was super easy to do. I have posted pics of the install at the Yahoo groups for Icom R75.

It's so sensitive I picked up a couple of Hams last night talking from North Dakota and Salt Lake City and I live in Ohio.

I just ordered the UT-102 unit and will install a CW filter and I'm good to go.

It is hands down the best receiver that I have ever owned and at a fraction of some of the other receivers out there.

Go Icom!!
EI4GMB Rating: 3/5 Oct 23, 2010 13:18 Send this review to a friend
Icom IC-75 V Drake R8  Time owned: more than 12 months
As has been suggested the Drake R8 does indeed suffer from muffled or more mellow audio, hence the reason why I use a good external speaker with mine. But it is a far superior radio for working AM DX than the R75, which I would give the edge on SSB.
Indeed, there are far better radios out there than the R75. The AOR 7030+ is one I could think of and this will probably be my next acquisition!!!
N5JRN Rating: 5/5 Oct 22, 2010 19:17 Send this review to a friend
A good, solid receiver  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
It's your basic modern HF communications receiver, with a bit of low-end VHF thrown in for good measure. It does everything it's advertised to do, and has no real glaring design defects (which is more than one can say for some competing receivers in this price bracket).

It suffers the bane of most modern communications receivers (crap audio). If I didn't like to take my radios camping, I'd have gotten a classic tube-type communications receiver, primarily for the sound. Unfortunately, those aren't very portable and all those tube heaters gobble far more electricity than I have to spare out in the woods.

Part of the problem is the extremely tiny speaker the set was built with. Making use of the external-speaker jack is highly recommended. Even then, audio is compromised by being limited to about 3 kHz bandwidth via an internal circuit you can't disable unless you perform surgery on the set. I'll note that Kiwa offers an audio upgrade (which I can't comment further on, having no experience with it).

Which brings up the biggest "what were they thinking?" aspect of the receiver: the 15 kHz AM-wide filter. What's the point of offering the option of demodulating 7.5 kHz worth of AM sidebands if the audio section is just going to throw that extra 4.5 kHz away? Not surprisingly, there is no discernible difference in audio between the 6 kHz and 15 kHz filters.

Like many have said, it does a better job on SSB than it does on AM. I think that's mainly due to the aforementioned limited bandwidth in the audio section. If you're tuning a broadcaster that's not crowded by nearby signals, it's nice to be able to crank the set wide-open to get the best audio fidelity possible. Those higher audio frequencies can really add to the listenability of a signal.

Another entry in the "what were they thinking?" department is the rf gain/squelch knob. I'd like it to just be an RF gain knob in all modes and forget about squelch. Unfortunately, the R75 can't do that. And one of the settings is just plain weird -- the knob acts as both, and the radio decides for you that you can't have the RF gain set anywhere other than the maximum and also have the audio squelched. Thankfully, with three preamplifier settings and a switchable attenuator, there's other options for controlling RF signal levels.

On the plus side, the tuning knob is nothing short of awesome. Even on the 10Hz tuning step, it's not hard to make it fly through frequencies just by tuning it faster. Slow down and the tuning rate slows down. Yes, lots of receivers do this, but Icom's engineers really did a good job of implementing the feature on the R75; it's by far the best I've experienced. It just works, without getting in the way. I can hunt for stations, then slow down and fine-tune one without having to fiddle with the tuning rate.

The keypad has the annoyance of requiring frequencies to be entered in megahertz, using a decimal point. As someone who is used to thinking of HF frequencies in kilohertz, that always trips me up.

So far, I haven't found many birdies on it, and the ones there are are all a pure tone (thus easy to notch out) and at S-1 or (usually) below. So far, I haven't found any problems with the CPU or the display-driver making RF interference.

It can display frequencies down to the nearest hertz, which is sort of overkill in my book, but the astounding thing (for a mass-produced product) is that the display actually seems accurate down to this resolution. Having such a fine tuning rate makes properly tuning SSB signals a snap. The display is backlit, and as it comes from the factory is almost painfully bright to my eyes; one of the first configuration changes I made was to dim the display.

Selectivity, noise reduction, mode, etc. are all displayed on the main LCD display, as is signal strength. Yeah, I'd have liked an analog S-meter, too, but the Icom's bar-graph does the job it was intended to do.

Icom has been shipping the R75 with the previously optional DSP board included for some time now. Unlike some, I find that the DSP NR filter really does help listenability in many cases; I'm glad it's there. I haven't had much opportunity to test its notch-filtering capabilities.

Its a modern Japanese receiver with lots of features and parameters. I haven't found that to be as annoying as I feared; the parameters one is most likely to want to change are all adjustable via a dedicated control, and the factory defaults are all pretty reasonable. The things one must enter a menu to change are mostly individual-preference options that I've set once and forgotten about.

All in all, a good, solid general-coverage receiver with some annoyances but no big glaring defects.
FOXBAT426 Rating: 5/5 Jul 16, 2010 09:26 Send this review to a friend
better than the e1 and drakes for sure  Time owned: more than 12 months
to the last poster - if your going for raw performance and the ability to hear serious DX as in weak signals, then the R75 demolishes the eton e1. if you don't believe me - put them side by side on an A/B switch box with the same antenna and compare directly. nuff said.

the bassy, muffled audio of the eton e1 and drake r8 line (remember the eton e1 is basically a drake) is not condusive for serious dx work. mellow audio - yeah right! if you like program listening on strong signals like VOA and BBC, get the drake. if you want serious dx performance, get the ICOM R75
<— Page 2 of 9 —>

If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews, please email your Reviews Manager.