|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
|
You can
write your own review of the ADI AT-201.
|
KB5DRJ
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Mar 12, 2005 17:12
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Got what I paid for! 
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
Considering that the radio is pretty inexpensive and comes with a 12V battery, I'd say that it is well worth the price.
It does tend to pick up my computer, and does not have the best receiver, but it works ok for a beginner radio.
I dropped mine on concrete from about 5 feet and all that happened was that I scuffed the bottom corner of the battery. Even though the radio feels like hard plastic, it seems to be sturdy enough.
73's
KB5DRJ
|
|
KG6POG
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jan 24, 2005 18:06
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Reliable easy to program HT 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I have had a few HT's and this has to be the easiest one I have to program. It also has great battery life with the new OEM battery. If used as a mobile it's great having 5 watts, and seeing that it can be found for under $90.00 makes it a great buy.
I feel it's a solid well-built HT makes that I feel comfortable using while camping or using for other outdoor activities
I have added a decent speaker mic, and a Diamond 5/8ths wave-telescoping antenna that really improves the TX/RX. The onboard speaker is a little weak, but I believe most people use a speaker mic anyway, so I don’t see that as a negative.
I would recommend this HT to anyone for the money it can't be beat. For under a $100.00 I haven’t seen another HT that competes with the ADI-AT-201-HP.
|
|
W1HEN
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Sep 18, 2004 10:00
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Good cheap HT 
|
Time owned: 6 to 12 months
|
Picked up a pair of these for $60 each (new, old stock) and have been very pleased. For the price I paid, its an excellent little rig. I use all power levels and different battery packs and both rigs work equally well. I use them both all the time. The receive is above average and I get very good audio reports.
The only negative comment I have, is, the manual. It's a real adventure.
I couldn't be happier with these "cheap" little radios.
Rick
W1HEN
|
|
KG4MUW
|
Rating: 3/5
|
May 5, 2004 21:03
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
poor receiver 
|
Time owned: 3 to 6 months
|
All features work as advertised. Power output is up to 6W for a few transmissions on battery. Even on a new battery, the 6w fades quickly.
But the receiver sensitivity is quite poor. When compared to another HT, or mobile, it seems to be about 1/2 as sensitive using the same antenna, and based upon S meter and the ear.
Find yourself an Icom, or a Standard. The receiver on my Standard beats my Icom and the AT201 hands down.
|
|
VA3PKR
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Sep 24, 2003 13:38
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Good Entry Level HT 
|
Time owned: 6 to 12 months
|
Not a bad entry level HT. Easy to operate.
Ron, KB1KHQ email me for a copy of the manual
73 David va3pkr@sympatico.ca
|
|
KB1KHQ
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Sep 24, 2003 11:10
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Great Price 
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
I have just purchased an AT-201 hand held at a yard sale at a price I could not refuse.
The problem is that all the parts are in the box except the instructions. Does some one have a copy that I can have or access on the web to one. I did manage to get the repeater in St. Albans VT programed so I can talk to my club for now. But there are so many features that you need to be a rocket science to figure out. For the time being I have gotten back that there is a very good quality signal and I have been able to get the repeater from 40 miles away through our mountains.
Thank You
Ron D
KB1KHQ
|
|
K9WVM
|
Rating: 2/5
|
Aug 21, 2003 15:11
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Great price thats about all 
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I have owned two of the AT-201 hand helds, the first on had so much intermod that I sent it back to Calif. for repair. I waited almost a month and heard nothing from them. I called and was told that the righ was sent out after being fixed. No rig after two weeks. Called again and spoke to supervisor and complained about their warranty service. They sent me a new (?) HT, some of the intermod problems are gone. BUT my biggest problem and maybe some can help me HOW do you lock out a channel. The book tells you how to delete entire freq. but nothing about locking out a channel. BIG LET DOWN. I would not buy another one. Manual is terribly written.
|
|
KI4BGF
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Jul 7, 2003 10:59
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Good 
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
This is a good little rig for those on the go.
Is there anyone out there that can help me increase the watts on this?
73
Jack
|
|
KD5GOV
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jun 4, 2003 00:11
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Great little rig! 
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
As a longtime owner of an ADI AR-146 (and very satisfied), I bought this HT (AT-201HP) to tote around during our many tornado watches and warnings. HRO - $99.95 now
It comes with instructions on unlocking the receiver (which will pick up approx 130-170Mhz), so you can also use it as a scanner to monitor emergency services (police, fire, etc), monitor NOAA weather radio, etc. This is very handy when you are sitting in the basement shelter!!
So far I am very satisfied with the unit.
One suggestion, you MUST get the glove-fitting leather case for it to pad it in case of a fall or bump. HRO has the cases for $5.95 right now (and worth every cent). Leather, velcro fastener, clear window over display/buttons, you can do everyting without removing it from the case (including charging the NiMH pack). really cool!!
73s
Alan
|
|
VE3GIH
|
Rating: 3/5
|
Jun 1, 2003 07:42
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Passable 
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
The manual is terrible. It is obviously a translation from another language, complete with new spelling, grammer and technical errors. It has taken me quite a while to get the radio working well, because the manual is so bad. If this was my first radio, it would be very discouraging.
The radio seems to work, but comments on my audio indicate that the modulation may need improvement.
I knew this was a low cost radio when I bought it, and that had to mean some compromise somewhere. The set works, with some question about the transmit audio. The poor quality of the manual makes the product more difficult to use than it should be.
|
|
If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews,
please email your Reviews Manager.
|
|
|
|
|