- Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Friends Remembered
Survey Question

DX Cluster Spots

Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement

donate to eham
Reviews Categories | Antenna Tuners | SGC SG-230 Help

Reviews Summary for SGC SG-230
SGC  SG-230 Reviews: 61 Average rating: 4.7/5 MSRP: $595.00
Description: SG-230 Smartuner automatic microprocessor antenna coupler.
Product is in production.
More info:
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.

My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

You can write your own review of the SGC SG-230.

<— Page 2 of 7 —>

PU2KOC Rating: 5/5 Feb 2, 2012 17:38 Send this review to a friend
Excellent  Time owned: more than 12 months
This is the best and most reliable tuner ever made. I have been using mine for the last 16 years and never got a fault or “no-tune”. Just have a good grounding system or some ¼ wave length wires well attached to the ground terminal and it will tune your random wire to less than 1:1.5 always. Use the length according to the tuner specs. (they really match!)
Just now, after 15 years I decided to open it and do some relay cleaning with a clean business card and some “blue showers” or equivalent contact cleaner. A very small dirt came out from some of the relays, may be the ones that are most used during the switching.
Since my SG230 is always exposed to rain, I added a sealing tape all around the corners were the two housings join and some silicon glue in the bottom part of the output connector. After opening it, NO corrosion or moisture found on the PC board.
My suggestion is to keep the internal jumper to “always tune” so if you change frequency, or, if it rains or moisture changes, we don’t use the memory pre-set conditions that could leave the SWR at a higher value.
Congratulations to the SGC design team and the quality of the components used.
W6EDD Rating: 5/5 Oct 27, 2011 10:14 Send this review to a friend
Great for Stealth Antenna  Time owned: 6 to 12 months
Like many, I live in an antenna restricted area so I needed to come up with something. A friend came across this tuner and we were thinking how it would work on my 3" dia, 38' aluminum mast flag pole on the deck in my back yard for flying my flags. Mounted the tuner at the bottom of the 4x4 that the flag pole is mounted to, with a 5' 4 gauge wire connected between flag pole and tuner. Used an old 12v power supply to power it and 4 radials off the tuner ground lug. She is working SUPER!! Flat swr on all HF except 10m which I get about a 1.2. Have made contacts all over with good reports.
I was using a 6BTV with a lot of radials before this and the flag pole got better reports. Have since removed the 6BTV and only using the flag pole now.
K5TED Rating: 4/5 Oct 5, 2011 19:50 Send this review to a friend
Good product  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
Just got a used one from the Belton TX Ham Expo and it works as advertised. It tunes below 2:1 and in most bands 1.4:1 from 160m thru 10m on a 40' +/- length of #12 electrical wire strung horizontally about 25' high. Ground is a three floor steel stairwell.

I don't notice any particularly better transmit performance on any band compared to the same wire on a 9:1 unun with manual tuner, but now I don't have to manually re-tune all the time. I did test last weekend with a station in NH, on 20m PSK, switching back and forth between my MFJ-1786 magloop and the SG-230 & 40' wire combo, and that station reported no significant difference in signal strength in a blind test.

Receive may be a bit less noisy. Hard to tell just yet. Again, the bonus is being able to tune anywhere quickly.

Feedline radiation must be substantially lower now, and I do notice my pattern may have changed a bit according to reception reports via JT65 logger, PSK reporter and World SSTV cams. Not certain yet, though. Still evaluating. I can, however, now transmit OK on 160m and 75m, which were very hard to tune before on the manual tuner.

Overall, it was a well spent $150 for the unit in good condition with manual.
M6GOM Rating: 5/5 Aug 20, 2011 07:32 Send this review to a friend
Keeps on keeping on  Time owned: more than 12 months
I have had mine for over a year now, having bought it used with no history from a Bring and Buy stall at a ham rally. It has been outdoors in the lovely British weather all the time uncovered, even in the near record freezing winter we had this last year. It is screwed to a short wooden stake hammered into the ground and is feeding a 75ft inverted L with 20 ground radials between 15 and 40ft long and has performed flawlessly and continues to. Having a Kenwood TS480 and then TS590, I assigned CW Tune to one of the programmable keys and that is enough to wake it up.

One thing I noticed though is that when the inverted L was originally 68ft long, it had a hard time tuning the bottom end of 80m. I think it doesn't like 1/4 wavelengths. I added 7ft to it and it is fine.

One thing I would say is to learn EZNEC and model your antenna. Horizontal and inverted L antennas when used on multiple bands have lobes and nulls that increase with frequency in number and severity and become more narrow as the operating frequency rises and the antenna length increases over 1 wavelength. If you understand where your antenna transmits, it is a whole load easier to orientate it so the areas you want on the bands you intend to use don't end up in a -20dB null on both TX and RX.
PA3GQD Rating: 5/5 Feb 1, 2011 14:47 Send this review to a friend
excellent  Time owned: 6 to 12 months
Living in a small appartment I almost gave up my radio hobby. A small whip with a wire extension from my balcony in conjunction with my SG-230 gives me a usable and most convenient antenna for working HF 80 mtrs and up. Yes, even 80 is usable with this setup. Now enjoy contesting and casual CW QSOs again.

Not cheap but most recommended.
KK5JY Rating: 4/5 Nov 15, 2010 22:02 Send this review to a friend
Very useful.  Time owned: more than 12 months
I like to experiment with antennas, so I have used this and one of its kin (the 237) to allow me to string up all manner of wire antenna, then match them to my radio. Dipoles, ground planes, even some loops.

If you use a balanced antenna, choke the cable. SGC says that's not necessary, but I have had the experience of others with feedline radiation. Choked the feedline at the tuner and problem solved. Wrap its 9' cable on a toroid or use a prefab choke like you can get from DX Engineering.

Why 4 and not 5? It gets a 4.5. When moving from one antenna type to another, it is occasionally hard to force it to retrain. This tuner does not have an option to reset the memories in one operation. It has to 'relearn' by use. If you use it on one antenna, then move it to another antenna that has similar impedance characteristics, it will try its memory tune first, and if that is less than 2:1 SWR, it will be satisfied with that, even though it can do better. My experience is that I have to temporarily modify the new antenna to mess up the impedence enough that it forces it to relearn a new tuning solution, then put the antenna back the way it was, and retrain it again.

If they would add a button, even internally to the unit, that would simply force it to 'forget' all of its in-memory tuning solutions and start from scratch. I would give the tuner a 5+.

Used inside, outside, hot weather, cold weather. Read SGC's documents on 'good' installations, and the things written by others, and it will serve you well.
WA8FEA Rating: 5/5 Sep 7, 2010 07:57 Send this review to a friend
Great Tuner!  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I live in a HOA subdivision and had to put up a "stealth" type antenna. I just purchased the SG-230 and use it in conjuction with a Zero Five 30 foot Flagpole antenna. Very happy with both! I am able to load up the Flagpole on all bands between 12 and 160 meters. After only having it up and running several days, I have used to make contacts on 15, 20,40 and 75. Also, purchased the Array Solutions ATD-1 in order to ground the antenna and protect the tuner when not in use. Although I ended up spending more money than I originally planned, I'm very satisfied with the results.

KQ6EA Rating: 5/5 Sep 2, 2010 13:21 Send this review to a friend
Outstanding!  Time owned: more than 12 months
Have to agree with all the others here. This thing just flat-out WORKS! I've had mine since about 1995, and I've used it with random wires, loops, verticals, and an odd assortment of other items just to prove it could be done. A friend of mine and I even loaded up a wet string (soaked in salt water!) one time on a bet.
I'm currently using my SGC-230 with a Shakespeare AT-1011 24' (I left two sections out) military vertical mounted on the roof of our patio, about 12' feet above the ground. I have six elevated radials "One Third Longer Than The Radiating Element" as per the SGC manual, and it works extremely well. I've even loaded it on 160 and made a few contacts, a testament to how well the SGC loads odd-sized radiators.
Never had a bit of trouble with it, and I've gotten my money's worth out of it many times over!
PA3GQD Rating: 5/5 Sep 1, 2010 15:03 Send this review to a friend
excellent  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I live in an apartment since a few years and cannot put up something decent. Bought the 230 last week and have been able to work quite a few stations (JA, K, TF etc, CW and BPSK) on a 6 mtr long whip against the central heating system since. Excellent and fast automatic tuning. The tuner seems to get the best out of the tiny whip. One forget it's there and the thing just does it's job. The rattling is a bit disturbing and one wonders how long the relais will last. Otherwise in all respects: Recommended.
KK4A Rating: 5/5 Sep 1, 2010 07:59 Send this review to a friend
Perfect solution to my antenna problem  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I live in a neighborhood with antenna restrictions so I have been using attic antennas for the last few years. In addition to having lots of RF on the shack (my wifes treadmill goes beserk on 40 meters), the performance has been marginal so I began to explore my options for an outside antenna with a reasonable degree of stealth. My lot is 100 feet wide by 175 feet deep with a house in the middle and a 6 foot high wood fence around the back yard. I am fortunate to have a very tall tree in the back yard.

After reading about tuners located at the antenna feed point, and more specifically, the SGC tuners, I decided to mount an SGC 230 on the wood fence and run a random wire up to the tree. The wire is approximately 75 feet long and runs at an angle of about 70 degrees above the horizontal. I drove an 8 foot ground rod within 36 inches of the tuner and buried 12 radials (so far). Four of the radials are 65 feet long and the remainder are 16 feet long. Due to the location of the tuner, the radial pattern is not very symetrical (its downright lop-sided) and many of the wires don't run in a straight line. But it is the best I could do with the given conditions. As you might expect, my soil has poor conductivity. I connected all of the radials to the ground rod with a homemade device and connected the ground rod to the tuner with a 36 inch ground strap.

My shack is located on the second floor of my house and required a 150 foot run of coax and 2 pair of 16 gauge control wires for the tuner. This is far beyond the maximum distance recommended by SGC. I was much more worried about voltage drop in the 12 volt control wires than I was about the signal loss in the coax. I connected the control wires to a power supply in the shack and to a Smartlock tuner controller. The Smartlock device is not required for tuner operation but is a nice add-on feature.

The on-air results have been very satisfying so far. I can operate on any frequency on all the HF bands (10-160) with very low VSWR (typically less than 1.1 and never over 1.3. The problems caused by too much RF in the shack have completely gone away (an unexpected benefit). The antenna wire is invisible from the street. The tuner operates perfectly in spite of the long distance from the shack.

Please understand that I am not making any claims about the efficiency of the random wire antenna. I am quite sure that it is not nearly as efficient as a resonant antenna at a given frequency would be. However, it is far better than my attic antennas in all respects and has given me the ability to operate on any band with reasonable success and without throwing my wife off the treadmill.

<— Page 2 of 7 —>

If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews, please email your Reviews Manager.