- Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Friends Remembered
Survey Question

DX Cluster Spots

Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement

Reviews Categories | Transceivers: VHF/UHF+ Amateur Base/Mobile (non hand-held) | Yaesu FT-7900R Help

Reviews Summary for Yaesu FT-7900R
Yaesu FT-7900R Reviews: 62 Average rating: 4.4/5 MSRP: $329.00
Description: The Yaesu FT-7900R Dual Bander operates on 2M and 70CM. High power output is featured with 50 watts on 2 meters and 45 watts on 430 MHz. CTCSS/DCS Encode/Decode is built in. Over 1000 memories are available. It is WIRES compatible. The FT- 7900R well designed front panel provides simple, safe operation. The FT-7900R is ideal for the amateur who does not require cross-band repeat as found on the FT-8800R and FT-8900R. The FT-7900R has excellent receive range covering 108 to 520 and 700-990 MHz (less cellular).
Product is in production.
More info:
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.

My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

You can write your own review of the Yaesu FT-7900R.

<— Page 2 of 7 —>

KG4RUL Rating: 5/5 Nov 12, 2012 10:38 Send this review to a friend
No Problems at all  Time owned: 3 to 6 months
Some others have reported audio problems. I have an FT-7900 and an FT-8800 in my mobile. Switching from one radio to the other, listeners report no discernible difference.
VA6GC Rating: 2/5 Nov 12, 2012 09:15 Send this review to a friend
Bad audio  Time owned: 6 to 12 months
This comment is inspired by VE6AGE

I read the review on eham by ve6age and yes, I had the same audio problem.

Here is what I found a year ago with my FT-7900R, it was the radio. I had similar reports after I installed the 7900 in my car. 90% of the people commented the audio level was low or bad. So I checked antenna, tried 2 other micís and scoured the menu system wondering if I missed anything. The radio itself had the problem. I replaced it with an FT-857D for my car and guess what, no more complaints. The 857 is double the money but also double the radio. A little less power on UHF 20 vs. 35 Watts
I have owned and played with many Yaesu radios and found then all to be very good.
So if I needed to buy a new VHF/UHF radio. I would go with the 8800. Less power out on UHF and more money but no bad reports on audio.

Thank you VE6AGE for posting your comments on eham, it certainly helped me decide.

VE3GIV Rating: 4/5 Oct 9, 2012 06:10 Send this review to a friend
power lower than spec  Time owned: more than 12 months
W4LCM mentions in his post that the power levels are lower than advertised/spec and nobodoy else has complained.

Thank you W4LCM for bringing this 7900 anomaly to my attention. I am about to buy a 7900 today as a mobile rig.

I have a 7800, in fact it is my third 7800. I agree with W4LCM's observations 100%. All of my 7800's did exactly the same thing, lower than spec power output; about 20% on VHF and 25% on UHF. So your observations are right on the money are yiou are not alone. I used a Bird 43 to a commercial D/L to check the PO. In fact I interchanged 3 Birds to be sure. The cables used in the test were short non-resonant length LMR400.

This seems to be a common characteristic of this radio that knowbody talks or cares about. Other than that a good performer, provided you don't require dual RX, cross band repeat, echolink and all that stuff.

I'd give it a 4.5 but half marks are not an option.
N5MIS Rating: 5/5 Apr 29, 2012 08:19 Send this review to a friend
good for me  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
this is a great radio easy to use and program once you read the manual.
K3TD Rating: 5/5 Mar 11, 2012 11:02 Send this review to a friend
excellent performer  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
Installed the radio as a remote mount several weeks ago and have been very pleased with the overall performance. Love the fact that the remote mount kit is included with the radio as a promotion, also love the fact that the microphone plus into the control head instead of the T/R unit - well done Yaesu! Too bad the speak doesn't also plug into the control head, but the external speaker cable supplied with the remote mount kit made installing the external speaker in the front of the vehicle painless. I use the RT Systems ADMS-7900-USB software/cable for programming and highly recommend it. Receives well on the 222 band, too bad there is no option for TX even at reduced power. One nit - the Scan Resume can be set based on Time, Busy or Hold - but the Time option is not variable and 5 seconds is too short. Overall the radio is an excellent performer and a great value.
W4LCM Rating: 4/5 Feb 2, 2012 10:46 Send this review to a friend
No 50/40 only 40/30  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
My only complaint after one month of use
is that the power levels in this radio is NOT
what they advertise, I only can get
40 watts in Vhf and 30 watts in Uhf.

With all the advances in technology this
day, why is so difficult to achieve the power
they said the radio have?

Is this only happend to me, because I don't see to many complaints about this matter.
KJ6MSG Rating: 5/5 Nov 6, 2011 17:45 Send this review to a friend
Love the wideband receive.  Time owned: 6 to 12 months
This was my first rig, which I purchased shortly after I obtained my Technician license. I am very pleased with the purchase. My first contact was through a local area repeater using a Diamond X-50A up at 8 feet. Using just 5W, I consistently received glowing reports on how clear and natural my transmissions sounded.

I have since moved the radio to my truck with a Comet SBB-5 and it performs wonderfully. I bounce back and forth between listening to the repeaters and listening to the local public service and aviation frequencies. It functions wonderfully in both respects.

I am really happy with the FT-7900R and I would buy another one.
M1ERV Rating: 3/5 Sep 6, 2011 02:21 Send this review to a friend
Poor RX  Time owned: 3 to 6 months
Not happy with this radio from day one.It suffered from intermodulation and breakthrough even from airband,using a small co-linear.Sent it back to Vertec Standard.Now much better.Reasonable performance from cheap dual band.
KD9VI Rating: 5/5 Aug 26, 2011 10:33 Send this review to a friend
perfect radio for general use  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
I just do standard old FM on 2m and 440. I also have a bank for police and fire, and the local racetrack. I like its ease of use. I am very familiar with Yaesu. I have bought an ft 60, 7100, 1900 and 7900 off EBay and this was the best sounding both RX and TX. People say I sound so natural using this radio. I don't know if the previous owner did anything to the TX but the wrap and box were included, and there were no signs of opening the radio. I love the hyper settings because I have one for ham and one for police scanning. I love that these include 220 receive I just wish they all included all of 900 (the image of cellular is still blocked even though analog is no more! Can't do anything about that!) I do give it perfect rating because of the RX and TX quality.
KC3D Rating: 0/5 Aug 23, 2011 20:44 Send this review to a friend
Very dissapointing rig  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
Just got the radio yesterday. Deviation very poor even when set to wide. Have to almost swallow the mike and raise your voice to even get close to 3 kh. deviation.
Intermods very bad on VHF when near any rf activity (even in a less than heavy use area). Will probably send the radio back to AES in the next day or so.
I am amazed that Yaseau would put out this poor quality product.
<— Page 2 of 7 —>

If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews, please email your Reviews Manager.