|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
| Reviews Summary for Unadilla W2AU/W2VS Multiband Dipole |
|
Reviews: 15
|
Average rating: 4.5/5
|
MSRP: $85
|
|
Description: This is a W2AU balun used in conjunction with the Unidilla traps. While the traps are available for all HF bands from 80M through 10M, this antenna is based on the 80/40M trap dipole design found in the ARRL Handbook. The W2AU balun is used with a pair of 40M traps to create a multiband dipole antenna capable of operating on 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10 meters. It is approximately 110 feet in length and provides a relatively low SWR on these bands.
|
|
Product is in production.
|
|
More info: http://www.unadilla.com
|
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
|
You can
write your own review of the Unadilla W2AU/W2VS Multiband Dipole.
|
KF7OCD
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 3, 2011 00:36
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Was my back up antenna, it is now my primary...
|
Time owned: 6 to 12 months
|
This was my first antenna. I really liked it however to mount it permanently at the time was not possible. So I did some looking around and bought the 10 - 40 meter ground plane vertical antenna made by Zero Five antennas.
I had the vertical up for about four months and then my antenna mounting situation changed, so I threw up the W2AU and WOW! Since it is not vertically polarized I get WAY less noise and I can do 80 meters no problem.
To be fair to the vertical I am in a VERY high RFI area.
I liked the vertical BUT I LOVE THIS DIPOLE!!!
My dad (AC7X) says: "You may try other antennas however you will always go back to a dipole unless you have a big ass beam and a 60 foot tower like your old man!"
|
|
WB2IVU
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Apr 13, 2010 17:42
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Best trapped dipole ever!
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
Living in Rochester NY (original home of RAYCO) I purchased a set of KW-40 traps from Vic at Rochester Radio Supply in 1966. So, after 44 faithful years with never an issue whatsoever, I replaced them yesterday (4/12/10) with a set of new Unidella KW-40 traps. The only reason I replaced the original traps was, I purchased a new SGC power cube and did not want to take any chances with them and the higher power. This antenna has been my only multi band antenna ever.
|
|
WD0FIA
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Sep 20, 2009 23:08
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Nice Multi-Band dipole, reasonably priced.
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
|
Well made. I feel it works great and is a good buy. My LDG Z-100's and the Yaesu FT-950 internal tuner have no problems tuning it in the 5 bands. I cannot get them to tune it on MARS frequencies, but I never planned on using it there. Most stations report the signals off of dipole to be 3 to 4 S units higher than my 5BTV verticle.
|
|
K4MSG
|
Rating: 5/5
|
May 29, 2009 21:00
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Works FB, still a winner!
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
Back in the early 1960s I used a trap dipole made with the old Reyco traps essentially the same as the modern version - and it performed well despite being in a lousy location and not very high (about 15 at the center) and with part of one leg bent. Also, in those days it was supplied without the W2AU voltage balun which meant that the antenna was unbalanced. I expected the modern version to be at least as functional and I have not been disappointed.
I did modify the design a bit by making the wire elements longer than recommended in the data sheet (32 inner & 22 outer). Since I operate 100% CW on HF I made the inner sections 33 and the outer 24 and as expected this lowered the resonant frequency on 80 & 40 meters. Overall length of the wire is now 114 instead of 108 and the 80 & 40 meter minimum VSWR points are 3560 and 7085 kHz respectively, with 2:1 VSWR bandwidths of approximately 90 and 180 kHz on the two bands. VSWR on 30 meters and above is quite a bit higher but my MFJ-929 IntelliTuner is able to achieve a reasonable (VSWR 1.5 or less) match on the CW portions of all the other bands. I should note that the built-in tuner in my IC-756PRO easily tunes to 1:1 VSWR on the CW portions of 80 & 40 meters.
80 & 40 meters is where this antenna really shines. With the W2AU balun to achieve better (although no doubt not perfect) balance the pick-up of vertically polarized noise by the vertical portions of the coax feed is significantly reduced and the extra wire length definitely improves sensitivity over my 82 Alpha-Delta DX-DD (which is slated to become my low-mounted 80/40 meter NVIS antenna). The trap dipole is about 28 high at the center and has yielded very nice signal reports on the two lower bands. Even though it will load on the higher bands I dont expect superlative performance although sensitivity on 20 meters seems to be quite good and back in the 60s I worked a fair amount of DX on 20 with the old trap dipole, a Viking II (120-watt output) transmitter and a surplus BC-348 receiver.
This is a good general-purpose coax-fed wire antenna for multiband use but will require a tuner on the higher bands and on portions of the two lower bands that are outside of the 2:1 VSWR region. Some have reported trap failure problems with high power but I've always been a 100-watt kind of guy and this antenna is definitely a winner under these conditions, and I would expect that 200 watts is likewise not an issue.
|
|
W4FCC
|
Rating: 5/5
|
May 1, 2008 18:08
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Great for 75/40 and other bands with tuner
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I've had the Unadilla antenna in service for 2 1/2 years- W2AU balun, 40 meter traps- just over 50 feet on one end sloping down to 22 feet. The instructions give suggestions for wire lengths for general coverage on most of the HF bands, but I optimized mine for 75/40 phone. As it is now, I have VSWR below 2:1 from 3875-4020, and 7080-7300.
I also broke out some 1/2" PVC and made some spreaders and added a 20 meter dipole in parallel. Without an analyzer it took quite a bit of hauling the antenna up and down to resonate the 20 dipole, and it ended up being about 4" short per leg compared to the 486/f formula, but it did not affect tuning on 75 or 40 at all. The antenna with the trap tunes just fine on 30,20, 15, and 10 with an MFJ 941, but I wanted to be able to use my Heath SB-200 on 20 and wanted a low VSWR.
My TS-520SE tuned 20, 15, and 10 without the tuner, but I thought I'd spare the finals of my IC-718 the stress and bought the tuner. This antenna is used fairly often on the 3905 CC 75 and 40 meter nets, usually with 1200W PEP and it's done great.
I recommend this antenna, and would suggest weatherproofing the coax-to-balun connection. This antenna is spring-loaded on one end, and has survived some vicious winds with no change in VSWR.
|
|
W2PL
|
Rating: 3/5
|
Nov 28, 2007 18:31
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
Good Product - BAD customer service!
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I have used several of these over the years. Can't say anything bad about the product. The balun & traps work great. The one time I had a simple question after being a repeat, long-time customer I got zip for a response. That gets you a 3 in my book. NON-EXISTENT customer service -- a pity.
|
|
K3ICH
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Jul 7, 2007 07:51
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
160/75/60/40 meters, 2 sets of wires
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
I have a dipole arrangement using two sets of wires and two sets of Unadilla traps that has been a very good performer. Except for the slight loading (shortening) effect of the traps, it is almost a full half wave on 160. One leg has 75 meter traps for 160/75 coverage and the other leg has 40 meter traps for 60/40. The shorter leg droops about three feet below the longer top leg and is tied off to it with nylon rope. It is between two supports that are 110 feet apart, so the extra length comes away in a downward sloping, "lazy" Z pattern. The 75 meter traps are about 12 feet out on the legs of the Z, but it doesn't seem to have any bad effects on operation. The center is about 45 feet up and the ends of the "Z" are about 25 feet up.
I usually run 350 watts of AM where it's allowed and have not ever had a trap failure. I would add the caution to make sure the traps are tuned for the segment of the band you need. Don't expect 80 meter (CW/low end tuned) traps to work properly if you're running any power on 3900 kHz. I think the problem may be worse, as far as power dissapation in the traps, if the situation is reversed. That is, using 75 meter SSB/hi end tuned) traps on 80 (CW)
Over the years I have had various dipole antennas up using different Unadilla traps. All have worked to expectations.
|
|
W8WLC
|
Rating: 5/5
|
Mar 17, 2006 04:22
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
excellant buy
|
Time owned: 0 to 3 months
|
|
My Wife and I have an agreement about the backyard, its all mine for fall and winter and her's in the spring and summer for landscaping and planting projects.Since her projects end up better looking than my aluminum ones, every spring I remove my vertical and other antennas and replace them with a simple antenna. I had owned one of these antennas about 16 years ago, so decided to get another as one feedline for two bands sounded good. Assembly is a no brainer and tune up a snap. I will say if you run legal limit you could very well find a blown trap but for power levels to 1 KW output I would say your safe. Appearance is easy on the eyes.
|
|
WB5FNW
|
Rating: 4/5
|
Feb 16, 2005 07:40
|
Send this review to a friend
|
|
had one for over 20 years
|
Time owned: more than 12 months
|
|
I believe that the W2AU/W2VS 15m meter thru 80 meter antenna I have had using Unadilla blue traps since 1984 has served me very well - recently took the old antenna apart to clean it up, put new wiring, and see if the traps work - had a 40 meter inv vee up at 35 feet, added the KW40 blue traps, and added 24 ft 3 inches after the KW40's and had great SWR and reports on 80 CW for the 21 year old traps - only the KW20 20 meter traps were needing some TLC. The KW30's and KW15's look great, and I'll use them on one of my other antennas. When your needs change, you can recycle the traps, that's good news.
|
|
If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews,
please email your Reviews Manager.
|
|
|
|
|
