Search

Title

Author

Article Body

Manager


Manager - AB7RG
Manager Notes

Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...

Created by Rick McCallum, KC7MF on 2019-11-10
Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code Suitable for the Meanest Understanding

Boy are we getting a lot of articles on Morse code. There are few subjects more controversial than what was once at the very heart of amateur radio. Mr. Morse' code. What was once a radio fundamental seems frequently to be just an opportunity for one old poop to throw shade on another old poop. It has quite literally divided and almost conquered amateur radio. So here goes.

 

First and foremost, we should look at the father of this feast; Samuel Finley Breese Morse, OIC (Order of Isabella the Catholic Knights Cross.) I did not throw this award in rashly. It entitled him to call himself "His Most Illustrious Lord" if he was of a mind to. Anyway, nobody knows why Morse had to have four names. At least not now we don't because the ones who named him are all dead as a hammer. I am going to guess it is because his mother was a Finley-Breese and they were rich and could have four names, so they had to pick something. His dad was a preacher. Morse went to Yale where he studied, among other things, mathematics, religion (his dad was paying after all) and the Science of Horses. (God knows why the Science of Horses thing; something to fall back on if religion and math went south, I suppose. But then, something amazing happened...

 

Morse started painting. Not house painting, real painting. He went to Paris and took lessons. While he was there, he painted the Louvre. Well not the whole Louvre. He put up one seriously large canvass (6 feet by 9 feet) and, kept company by Jemes Fenimore Cooper (who, though also famous, only had three names, poor sod) painted one ginormous painting called "Gallery of the Louvre" which, he took back to the states and put on display for 25 cents a view. I do not want to gloss over his painting career. He was actually very famous. He painted such notables as James Monroe, John Adams and himself. His painting of the House of Representatives was a really big one two. It hangs in the national gallery (one presumes in lieu of Morse himself) and measures 9 feet by 12 feet. (The painting not the gallery. I don't know how big the gallery is but I have been there and we are talking seriously large. It has a boat load of paintings and many of them are very "interesting" if you know what I mean. I go there frequently as I find it broadening. But then I digress.)

 

PAINTING

 

So, Morse was a really important painter and after getting back from Paris set himself up painting for a living. In addition to his pay-per-view ginormous paintings of the Louvre and the House of Representatives, he found that once he learned to make regular size paintings, a lot of people wanted him to paint them. In fact, he was painting up a storm; rolling in the money, and founding the National Academy of Design, whatever that is.

 

So you would think, that would be that. But. You guessed it. That was not that...

 

BOAT RIDE

 

On his way back to the US from La Havre (France) he happened to have a discussion with a dude named Charles Thompson Jackson. (Chuck.) It appears they discussed sending messages over long distances. I only mention Jackson because he would later claim that Morse stole his idea. But that was just Jackson. He was an odd guy that way. He also later claimed to have invented guncotton, ether and digestion. Jackson was a medical doctor who went on a geological expedition to Nova Scotia (which means New Scotland, but I fail to see why you need to know that just at the moment. Try to stay focused.) Then he went crazy and died so I think we can just drop him and move on. Those of you who want to learn more about Jackson can read up on him but do try to refrain from boring the rest of us with your research. Your wife is angry enough about the endless beeping coming from your room and the fact that you call her pretty house a shack without asking her to sit through an hour of you telling her about how Jackson found copper in Lake Superior and you are not going to believe this honey, he became the first state geologist of Michigan! No jury would convict her.

 

Anyway. Morse, who had been a man of shining parts; someone to be reckoned with; the painter of his day and friend to Lafayette, decided to become a sort of mechanic and invent the telegraph. So, he did. And that was pretty much that. He clicked here and it clicked somewhere else. He got a repeater and some wire and BOOM! Telegraph. But that was the problem. He could click and someone somewhere else did not have a clue what he was clicking about. It must have been really annoying. (Ask your wife.) It was just then that the wheels really came off.

 

Morse needed a way to send a message, so he relied on his superior intellect and using an arbitrary and capricious methodology embraced "Morse Code". But don't blame Morse. He was a nice guy and imagined using only enough characters to send a number. Then the poor bored foo... I mean the operator at the other end would look up the numbers in a book and find that they referred to a word or phrase. For example, the numbers (6) and (237) together might mean My wife is eating too many turnips and (341) blowing up like a (987) "blowfish". That sounds pretty easy to me but along came a seriously mean guy named Al Vail (I mean Alfred Lewis Vail) who decided that there should be dots and dashes for every letter and special character and thereby earned, at least from me, eternal condemnation to the fires of...I mean praise for his needlessly complicat...I should say our exciting current system which is sort of mistakenly called "Morse Code". I can only imagine what he was thinking when he decided what an "a" was and what an "I" was, but I picture him giggling a lot. Probably he and Morse worked together"at night".in a forest" with a cauldron...

 

So then Morse sent What hath God wrought," and Vail answered "tell me about it" and we have all been saying this same thing down through the years. Vail got what was coming to him. He was only paid $900.00 a year. (In today's dollars $900.00 is what conservatives believe the annual minimum wage should be). So, he got Pis... I mean vexed and moved to New Jersey to do penance for inventing that lovely code, because it (penance) requires a shorter sentence if you go to New Jersey to do it.

 

MORSE CODE MOVES ON

 

Back in the day people had bupkes to do all day long. I mean maybe they painted the outhouse or petted a horse or cooked some beans but that was about it. (One of you just got that and the rest of you didn't. But don't let not having gotten it keep you up tonight.)... So, learning this complicated code was easy for them. I mean what else did they have to do? Learn Latin or choke their chicken (so they could cook it for dinner, come on boys) or learn Morse code and get a good job sitting around all day waiting for someone to send something and pass it along. Good money for easy work. So nobody was harmed and people made money from the code until along came an Italian.

 

Guglielmo Giovanni Maria Marconi, later 1st Marquis Marconi. (He kept his own four names when ennobled unlike most people who chose a place name like 2nd Earl of Peoria.) Anyway, this guy invented radio and stole Morse's code. It was a dark day in history. Soon tons of people were playing with radios so the government decided that it should screw around with...that is to say, ensure that radio was used carefully for the benefit of the adults and the amusement of little children. But how to do that?

 

License it. Make everyone who wants to signal someone else get a license. And this should be a prestigious license to have. Even if all you want to do is talk to Alfred David McGillicutty Jones down the road about borrowing a chicken for dinner you should have a license.

 

And what better way to make it hard? (The ah license I mean.) Make them learn Morse code. Or, to be more accurate, learn Alfred Lewis Vail's code.

 

So the FRC did just that. They made everyone who wanted to talk on the radio learn Morse Code. As amateur radio was anticipated to be a joyful hobby for its participants the FRC realized that if they imposed a code requirement, they would make new hams almost ecstatic. It did too. Countless hams have discussed this little piece of genius on the FCC's part using the most colorful language imaginable. Sometimes even evoking the deity. But it was not exactly the FCC's fault, I mean idea.

 

Digressing for a moment. Before there was an FCC there was an organization called the Federal Radio Commission I referred to. It ran the show from 1912 to 1932. Many members of my local radio club and almost all people writing reviews on this site remember it well. (The reviews that begin... I have been a ham since U.S. Grant was on KP...) Anyway, this FRC established the code requirement because it was thought that we would love it and anyway, if the military needed radio operators, there would be a ready supply. In those days radio licenses were mostly younger than today so they could join the military or be drafted without having to put prunes in all of the C Rations.

 

Well the good news is that congress abolished the FRC in 1932 and the bad news is that these new guardians of the airwaves kept the code. But on that glorious day of honored memory, February 23rd, in the fifth year of the reign of President George W. Bush, in the year of our Lord two thousand and seven, the requirement for Morse code to get an amateur radio license, ended.

 

But the whining had just begun. On that day in history, the geezer patrol went into full doomsayer mode. They sky was, after all, actually falling. A piece of American history was going to go away. "Appliance Operators" and "CB'ers" were taking over. It is the end of Amateur radio forever. Might as well sell your equipment (ham equipment I mean) because soon everybody in the country will be nattering away on 80 meters. Well they were partially right. Some pretty nefarious characters were indeed nattering away on 80 meters, but then they always had been. After all, what is required to operate on 80 meters but a dipole, a 1500-watt amplifier and a bad attitude? Funny thing though is that they were the same nefarious characters who had been nattering away there for decades. But then I digress again...

 

The new hams were a HUGE surprise to everyone. They were polite, by and large used proper radio procedures and were enthusiastic about the hobby. They studied, learned about radio, experimented with new equipment and gave the hobby a boost it had needed for a couple of generations. But then, to the disappointment of many in the Amateur Radio Service, a great many of the disloyal bast...that is to say our fine new no-code hams, went out and learned Morse Code anyway.

 

K6BSU2020-02-20
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
Gentlemen; I'm here to tell you that Morse Code can also be a curse!

I went through USAF Radio Op school at keesler AFB back in 1952. The course was 9 months; 6 days a week and 5 hours a day; mostly sending and receiving Morse with a "mill" (typewriter) and straight key. Total immersion and intense! I guess I was one of the lucky ones, because I passed 25 WPM sending and receiving about a month early. So I got to ease up on the Morse and got to play with radios; BC610, BC779, ART 13 and such, while the rest of the students struggled to pass the course.

A "curse" because for years, Morse Code dominated my brain; I dreamed in Morse. Every time I drove by a road sign, I read it in Morse. It would not leave me, although I tried.

For my 3 remaining years in USAF, I copied Morse; As an "Intercept radio Operator", I copied Morse on a mill sent by certain operators (countries not mentioned in order to protect my security clearance). In my spare time, while waiting for my "target" to come up, I copied "Peiping Press", the Chinese propaganda frequency at 35 WPM.

Fortunately, I'm getting over the curse. But I'm 86 years old, and still not free of Morse.
Reply to a comment by : KC7MF on 2019-11-10

KF7ATL2020-01-07
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
I am not an "old timer". I am 63 and have been licensed for about 10. I have a blue collar job, and therefore have to live within a budget. I own a plain vanilla, 100 watt radio, and use a wire antenna. I have tried digital and did not care for it. I found that I do not bust many pileups on SSB with 100 watts to a low mounted wire antenna. For that reason I chose to learn code. It just works more effectively for me. But guess what? In the process, I discovered that code is fun and I enjoy it. If you don't like code, that's fine. I have no quarrel with those who don't,
for whatever reason. I do think that there are enough people like me that code will be around for a while longer.

Just my 2 cents.
Reply to a comment by : KC7MF on 2019-11-10

KC7MF2019-12-07
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
When I wrote this article I was pretty sure I would get the old timers snapping mad and it certainly did. What was meant to be a lighthearted look turned out the real folks who will be the end of amateur radio.

So I will indulge myself in a final shot. I totally understand that "back in the day" it was arguably harder to get a license. This does not mean that old-time operators are better for the service. This is a different day. For the people who insist on calling hams who do not care to learn code "CB'ers and appliance operators" I would simply say this: You need to get over yourself. You have grown older but grow up. The rules have changed and they are not going back.

Those of us who engage in code are fortunate to have our own bandwidth. That has not changed. The fact is that the first thing that ought to go away is that. If code is no longer required, why set aside whole swatches of the band plan for CW? Why not open it up to everyone?

The people of a country own the spectrum not us. They can use it as they see fit to serve their best interest. If we make it the domain of some few people who simply use it for a hobby without a greater or at least secondary purpose of public service then we deserve to lose it all. And we serve the greater good when we have substantial numbers of operators prepared to help in an emergency. Code has absolutely nothing to do with this in these days of digital modes.

So to the people who learned code to get your licenses I leave you with this. Good for you. Now it is time for you to stop whining like children about how hard you had it and start doing what is right for the service. That is to enthusiastically welcome new hams and encourage others to test and get their licenses. Answer their questions and don't treat them like second class citizens. They aren't. They are the future of this hobby if there is to be one. And if, because it is fun, and for no other reason of any importance at all, they wish to learn Morse Code, help them. And if you can't do that kindly just be quiet. Your whining and sniveling is not helping the hobby. It is hurting it.

Reply to a comment by : VE4WD on 2019-12-07

Up in 'ole Canada, before the No Morse crap came in, we only had two classes of licenses. Amateur and Advance and a third, Digital. Few could hack Shannons Law and Fournier analysis. But no how, if one really desired a ham ticket without BS CB lingo rap in it, and grade 2 math ability, they had to work hard on an almost technician knowledge of radios, antenna's, 12 word minute morse, paragraph answers. One could NOT work voice on any band, only on 10 meters after 6 months or 100 contacts on CW. CW could be used on ANY band in the amateur spectrum. Even with old repaired boat anchors, I got DXCC on a shoestring. I never bought a new rig all my life. I always fixed everyones headaches. By the time one finished their second license with 15 wpm, one had the knowledge to repair just about any rig with the basics of test equipment. It's BS one can't learn the code. I learned in spare time in 3 weeks. It was a joke. Trouble with people is these days is they have a low attention span and it's getting worse. Even to this day, I can't stand voice modes. I've got 4 Ragchewers award, nominated by unknowns for chatting in morse more than 20 minutes. I hate those short exchanges and the dude says " wife said supper is ready" " gotta go now ", yeah, down the band blabbing how great his new rig is and moves all over the dial with the same rap. Ham these days is what a DOC rep said years ago to me " Ham in nothing more that glorified CB" Sure enough, that is what it has become until one day, it's demise is what it will be, a bunch of high power CB'ers, or until the Radio Conference just shuts down the "service." or lower the power to 5 watts all bands. That's a good solution. Best just to shut it all down. I wouldn't miss it at all, not the way it has progressed. It's all just a joke no one really has any respect for anymore. Close it up and fold it away and cry Amen. Glorified CB for now......and down the road is your imagination
Reply to a comment by : W3TDH on 2019-11-29

Any chance we could keep our facts straight when talking about the No Morse [Recording Telegraph Company] Code phonies like myself. It's true that I learned the International Radio Telegraph Code to get my Novice License but it wasn't renewable back then and life got in the way so I did not move on to the General License back then. When I went to reenter the ranks the International Telegraph Code was no longer a requirement at any speed so I did not invest time learning it. My brother however was an Extra class licensee many years ago. He told me last year that he had crawled up the mountain via the trail paved with the broken glass and when he got there he found the view dammed disappointing. The only radio communications which ever made use of Morse Code was that carried on between shore stations and coastal or great lakes shipping up until federal law required the use of International Radio Telegraph Code on all vessels under US jurisdiction. The International Code came into existence as soon as Europeans began using the telegraph. Morse Code was unsuitable for use in any language which did not use the English alphabet. I told the people who were still active in amateur radio that I knew at the time that the code requirement was going to be gone in Twenty Years when the United States Naval Academy dropped it as an elective Course. They were the last of the six service academies to do so but they had made the decision that learning International Radio Telegraph Code was not useful to United States Navy Academy Cadets. I was wrong of course. It only took 10 years for the FCC to drop the requirement for Amateur Radio Operators to demonstrate proficiency in International Code. But what about the language in part 97 which reads "The perpetuation of the knowledge and traditions of telegraphy." Not there you say? Never was there you say. Why yes you are right that is actually from the purpose statement of the Morse Telegraph Club. Perhaps I was thinking of the Part 97 regulations language which reads "(d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts." Hmm, It seems the FCC no longer believes that knowledge of International Telegraph Code helps fulfill Part 97.1(d) in that the nation no longer has a need for proficiency in International Telegraph Code amongst that "reservoir.. of trained operators." I will call anyone who claims that I have said that the present requirements for Licensure as an amateur radio operator are beyond improvement a bold faced liar. I am actually trying to learn Morse Code however. That is because it is the telegraph code used in the United States and Canada and nowhere else except the World War One battle zone in which American soldiers and marines were deployed. Perhaps those who lament the end of the requirement to learn telegraph code should reconsider which code people should learn since the only real reason to learn a telegraph code is historical preservation. -- Tom Horne
VE4WD2019-12-07
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
Up in 'ole Canada, before the No Morse crap came in, we only had two classes of licenses. Amateur and Advance and a third, Digital. Few could hack Shannons Law and Fournier analysis. But no how, if one really desired a ham ticket without BS CB lingo rap in it, and grade 2 math ability, they had to work hard on an almost technician knowledge of radios, antenna's, 12 word minute morse, paragraph answers. One could NOT work voice on any band, only on 10 meters after 6 months or 100 contacts on CW. CW could be used on ANY band in the amateur spectrum. Even with old repaired boat anchors, I got DXCC on a shoestring. I never bought a new rig all my life. I always fixed everyones headaches. By the time one finished their second license with 15 wpm, one had the knowledge to repair just about any rig with the basics of test equipment. It's BS one can't learn the code. I learned in spare time in 3 weeks. It was a joke. Trouble with people is these days is they have a low attention span and it's getting worse. Even to this day, I can't stand voice modes. I've got 4 Ragchewers award, nominated by unknowns for chatting in morse more than 20 minutes. I hate those short exchanges and the dude says " wife said supper is ready" " gotta go now ", yeah, down the band blabbing how great his new rig is and moves all over the dial with the same rap. Ham these days is what a DOC rep said years ago to me " Ham in nothing more that glorified CB" Sure enough, that is what it has become until one day, it's demise is what it will be, a bunch of high power CB'ers, or until the Radio Conference just shuts down the "service." or lower the power to 5 watts all bands. That's a good solution. Best just to shut it all down. I wouldn't miss it at all, not the way it has progressed. It's all just a joke no one really has any respect for anymore. Close it up and fold it away and cry Amen. Glorified CB for now......and down the road is your imagination
Reply to a comment by : W3TDH on 2019-11-29

Any chance we could keep our facts straight when talking about the No Morse [Recording Telegraph Company] Code phonies like myself. It's true that I learned the International Radio Telegraph Code to get my Novice License but it wasn't renewable back then and life got in the way so I did not move on to the General License back then. When I went to reenter the ranks the International Telegraph Code was no longer a requirement at any speed so I did not invest time learning it. My brother however was an Extra class licensee many years ago. He told me last year that he had crawled up the mountain via the trail paved with the broken glass and when he got there he found the view dammed disappointing. The only radio communications which ever made use of Morse Code was that carried on between shore stations and coastal or great lakes shipping up until federal law required the use of International Radio Telegraph Code on all vessels under US jurisdiction. The International Code came into existence as soon as Europeans began using the telegraph. Morse Code was unsuitable for use in any language which did not use the English alphabet. I told the people who were still active in amateur radio that I knew at the time that the code requirement was going to be gone in Twenty Years when the United States Naval Academy dropped it as an elective Course. They were the last of the six service academies to do so but they had made the decision that learning International Radio Telegraph Code was not useful to United States Navy Academy Cadets. I was wrong of course. It only took 10 years for the FCC to drop the requirement for Amateur Radio Operators to demonstrate proficiency in International Code. But what about the language in part 97 which reads "The perpetuation of the knowledge and traditions of telegraphy." Not there you say? Never was there you say. Why yes you are right that is actually from the purpose statement of the Morse Telegraph Club. Perhaps I was thinking of the Part 97 regulations language which reads "(d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts." Hmm, It seems the FCC no longer believes that knowledge of International Telegraph Code helps fulfill Part 97.1(d) in that the nation no longer has a need for proficiency in International Telegraph Code amongst that "reservoir.. of trained operators." I will call anyone who claims that I have said that the present requirements for Licensure as an amateur radio operator are beyond improvement a bold faced liar. I am actually trying to learn Morse Code however. That is because it is the telegraph code used in the United States and Canada and nowhere else except the World War One battle zone in which American soldiers and marines were deployed. Perhaps those who lament the end of the requirement to learn telegraph code should reconsider which code people should learn since the only real reason to learn a telegraph code is historical preservation. -- Tom Horne
W3TDH2019-11-29
Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
Any chance we could keep our facts straight when talking about the No Morse [Recording Telegraph Company] Code phonies like myself. It's true that I learned the International Radio Telegraph Code to get my Novice License but it wasn't renewable back then and life got in the way so I did not move on to the General License back then. When I went to reenter the ranks the International Telegraph Code was no longer a requirement at any speed so I did not invest time learning it. My brother however was an Extra class licensee many years ago. He told me last year that he had crawled up the mountain via the trail paved with the broken glass and when he got there he found the view dammed disappointing.

The only radio communications which ever made use of Morse Code was that carried on between shore stations and coastal or great lakes shipping up until federal law required the use of International Radio Telegraph Code on all vessels under US jurisdiction.

The International Code came into existence as soon as Europeans began using the telegraph. Morse Code was unsuitable for use in any language which did not use the English alphabet.

I told the people who were still active in amateur radio that I knew at the time that the code requirement was going to be gone in Twenty Years when the United States Naval Academy dropped it as an elective Course. They were the last of the six service academies to do so but they had made the decision that learning International Radio Telegraph Code was not useful to United States Navy Academy Cadets. I was wrong of course. It only took 10 years for the FCC to drop the requirement for Amateur Radio Operators to demonstrate proficiency in International Code.

But what about the language in part 97 which reads "The perpetuation of the knowledge and traditions of telegraphy." Not there you say? Never was there you say. Why yes you are right that is actually from the purpose statement of the Morse Telegraph Club.

Perhaps I was thinking of the Part 97 regulations language which reads "(d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts." Hmm, It seems the FCC no longer believes that knowledge of International Telegraph Code helps fulfill Part 97.1(d) in that the nation no longer has a need for proficiency in International Telegraph Code amongst that "reservoir.. of trained operators."

I will call anyone who claims that I have said that the present requirements for Licensure as an amateur radio operator are beyond improvement a bold faced liar.

I am actually trying to learn Morse Code however. That is because it is the telegraph code used in the United States and Canada and nowhere else except the World War One battle zone in which American soldiers and marines were deployed. Perhaps those who lament the end of the requirement to learn telegraph code should reconsider which code people should learn since the only real reason to learn a telegraph code is historical preservation.

--
Tom Horne

KC7MF2019-11-17
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
Reply to a comment by : KJ4DGE on 2019-11-13

Yes any "twit" can become a ham and any "twit" can be anything else in the world of "twits". Even the most educated, skilled and polished ham radio tube builder can be a "twit". education does not em bide a person the person with common sense or rationale to be a decent individual. Only learning on a one to one basis with many others takes the idiot factor away. People accepting differences are more likely to be creative and skilled from what they learn from others than those who promote themselves as "experts" in a field or rationalize their skills as being better than anyone else. In the past they were called gunslingers and yes they knew how to kill people, that was what they were good at, living not so much...
Reply to a comment by : KC7MF on 2019-11-10

KJ4DGE2019-11-13
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
Yes any "twit" can become a ham and any "twit" can be anything else in the world of "twits". Even the most educated, skilled and polished ham radio tube builder can be a "twit". education does not em bide a person the person with common sense or rationale to be a decent individual. Only learning on a one to one basis with many others takes the idiot factor away. People accepting differences are more likely to be creative and skilled from what they learn from others than those who promote themselves as "experts" in a field or rationalize their skills as being better than anyone else. In the past they were called gunslingers and yes they knew how to kill people, that was what they were good at, living not so much...
Reply to a comment by : KC7MF on 2019-11-10

KA4KOE2019-11-12
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
***wheezing***

(speak in old geezer voice, asthmatic)

Back in my day, we had to learn morse code! We also had to walk 20 miles, in the snow, uphill both ways to the FCC office to take our exams. Learning electronics was dangerous....all that high voltage running around. One wrong move and it would be closed-casket funeral time. Boy it was hazardous. And our rectifiers were full of lethal mercury, but they glowed purdy.

Well, that's about all. Things were BAAAAD!!!! AND WE LIKED IT!!!!
Reply to a comment by : KC7MF on 2019-11-10

K7OFG2019-11-12
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
Thanks. Good humor, good history and just a darn good read.
I'm not going to argue the merits of learning or not learning the code. Too many of those that got their licenses back when Grant was doing KP would probably bore me to sleep. I just want to thank you for the fine read.
Thanks,
Steve,
k6ofg.
Reply to a comment by : KC7MF on 2019-11-11

This is about as I expected. First post and insulted no-code hams already. I know how to: Drive a stick shift. This does not make be a better or safer driver. I know how to can peaches. This does not make me a better cook. I know how to read a map. This does not get me where I am going any better than someone who has an Iphone. I can speak passable Spanish. This does not make me a better writer. I know how to test a tube. This does not make me a better radio operator. The article was meant in jest and certainly some will see that and others can't. Here is what puzzles me. I totally get that some of us had to do harder stuff to get a license. Get over it. The law now is the law now. If you came to a VE today and wanted to demonstrate your code during the test he would turn you down. YET. Every day a brand new ham, with no requirement to do so, decides to learn Morse code. If this is not a compliment to all who have gone before I don't know what is. I would go on to say that if we look ONLY at the extra's today who had to pass 20 WPM code to get their license were to have to retest, there would be far fewer extras today because many, if not most, would blow the code and not all that many would pass the written test. I wonder if those folks who post here moaning about no requirement to pass code were to be required to learn to write computer code to post here, how many of them would even try. My guess is not many at all. There was a time when writing computer code was required to have a rudimentary computer. There was a time when Morse code was required to operate a radio. Today neither is even close to necessary. And even if it were, given today's technology, anyone can send 30 WPM if they can type that fast. Or is the idea simply to make Amateur radio a hard club to join? To keep people out rather than welcome them in. If that is what you want, go join the Masons. They have a memorization exercise for you that will make your head spin. If you want better operators then complain to the FCC that there are not enough questions about proper operating procedures on the tests. I welcome my no code friends to Amateur radio. They are honored, welcome and valued. If you, my friends, want them to learn code then put out a plate of cookies, get out your spare straight key and buzzer and sit down and practice with them. If you are not willing to do that then kindly let them alone.
Reply to a comment by : W9YW on 2019-11-11

Dear VK2MS, Code is not the substrate of the service. It was one hurdle of many to prove you could be trusted not to muck things up. The world will continue to become more diverse. Their values will vary from yours. I respect your history. The rest of us are re-inventing it every day. I lament some of the changes. Some are attempting to keep the amateur radio culture alive, and its ultimate aims *interesting*, convivial, constructive, and responsive to the world, given our talents. I'm a no-code licensee. I learned it long ago, but gave up the hobby after passing my Novice. I couldn't get the General wpm needed to pass that test and let it go. 40+ years later, I picked it up and learned it and hit 20wpm. I'm working on 30. I completely do not care if others do this or not; it's a personal challenge. Only few people sit for all three exams in the same day. Should they pass, good for them. I bear them no other distinction other that they're good and diligent operators. They come from all walks of life, all genders, colors, and shades of hair (if they have any). Doesn't matter to me, and it shouldn't matter to you. I don't fear them, and they shouldn't fear me. There should be no aristocracy in amateur radio. I didn't find much humor in the post. The continuing battle over Morse Code seems silly to me, but it's evidence of people getting stuck while other important issues become entropic-- like interference, spectrum abuse/misuse, and random acts of idiocy. Diligence and tenacity pays. 73 Tom W9YW
Reply to a comment by : VK2MS on 2019-11-11

Until perhaps the '60's an Amateur radio operator had to have substantial electronic engineering skills. Amongst his/her exam questions (here) was being asked him to design aspects of a receiver and transmitter. He had to be very familiar with ham conduct and the other aspects in tradition and emergency. He also had to pass a send and receive code exam. The "Z" calls, the VHF 'no code' promenaded themselves as the 'intelligentia' and wanted to take over, and did so, the WIA. VHF exploration was done well before they woke up one day and saw an opportunity to not have to learn Morse code, whereas SSB and Morse can be used on VHF.It is not excluded but when people think they are something really special 'god's gift' any evasion to promenade their special personage is ok...rings on bishops fingers, yamulkas, masonic signals, pig-Latin, tattoos, body jewellery, hoodies, confrontional hairdo's, pointy black beards...so on and on. The amateur service need for electronics skills declined as commercial receivers, transmitters, antenna systems became available and later affordable.A lot of amateur operators felt threatened with lowering standards to the Novice. Like the Foundation Licence the Novice was said to be an inspiration to achieve higher calls. Unlike the Novice the Foundation is just a pathetic machination to keep fees coming in , selling commercial gear and running 'electronics, courses. Of those three I applaud the last but the core of Amateur Radio, the exclusivity which led to equality in science inclusivity has passed. The excluding of Morse Code from most commercial aspects and emergency gave the evaders the opportunity to become 'Hams'. Many were, a reasonable guess and from my reading, were CB or illegal operators. Now all you needed was the ablity to recognise a PL259, resistor capacitor and coax, switch on a set and call CQ and reply. In other words a mildly glorified CB operator and too lazy or couldn't care-less or reactive to become a traditional Ham. What's a traditional ham??...never heard of that. As an instructor and examiner(whilst the WIA demanded we join it and took all the income whilst we paid the costs of doing it a favour ) I was reprimanded for introducing tradition, an aspiration for Code and proper 'on-air' conduct. Each visit to the club I hear foul-mouthed bullies ...supposedly licensed...on 2M duplex stirring up trouble. Suggestions 'real' hams tell them to back off, even shut down the repeater met with 'you can't tell other ham what to do'...well actually regulation once did and brother hams told what was then an occasional loud-mouth, the 'word'. Using the whatever amendment/s of the constitution the American "I have a right to a Ham Licence" commonly have a litany of excuses, reasons and sob-stories about learning code. It's just nonsense. They don't want to learn it so they don't. Like say Americans and Brits in France 'French is too hard...I can't learn it'...that's more nonsense. Code and language have methods which simplify expertise in them. Sandy Lynch's (SK) octogenarian grandmother competently learned the Code and used it. The Drover's dog could probably learn it if exceptionally disabled persons can't learn it then perhaps they should stay on CB...after all 100-500W has been used unlawfully for decades on CB. "Oh...but then they have to put up with the CB idiots'...yes...and the idiots should be excluded from the Amateur Service unless having reasonable electronic skills, operating manners and Code competency. You can't learn Code?? In the words of 'Big Daddy' Burl Ives "BULL". Mocking people who have allegiance to Ham tradition, manners, skills, exclusivity and Morse Code is easy, I can do it too, it only takes getting started but....with so many incredibly skilled hams, some young new, some older and aged the line should be clear...if you want to operate in the Ham Bands you have to deserve it in passing and utilising traditional skills. Any twit can buy...and perhaps most hams do...modern equipment join it up and call CQ. The skills can be shown in designing or building or renovating say tube sets, fixing test equipment, experimenting with traditional or new formula antennas. The Amateur Radio service was not like joining a sports club, it req
KC7MF2019-11-11
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
This is about as I expected. First post and insulted no-code hams already.

I know how to:

Drive a stick shift. This does not make be a better or safer driver.

I know how to can peaches. This does not make me a better cook.

I know how to read a map. This does not get me where I am going any better than someone who has an Iphone.

I can speak passable Spanish. This does not make me a better writer.

I know how to test a tube. This does not make me a better radio operator.

The article was meant in jest and certainly some will see that and others can't.

Here is what puzzles me. I totally get that some of us had to do harder stuff to get a license. Get over it. The law now is the law now. If you came to a VE today and wanted to demonstrate your code during the test he would turn you down. YET.

Every day a brand new ham, with no requirement to do so, decides to learn Morse code. If this is not a compliment to all who have gone before I don't know what is.

I would go on to say that if we look ONLY at the extra's today who had to pass 20 WPM code to get their license were to have to retest, there would be far fewer extras today because many, if not most, would blow the code and not all that many would pass the written test.

I wonder if those folks who post here moaning about no requirement to pass code were to be required to learn to write computer code to post here, how many of them would even try. My guess is not many at all.

There was a time when writing computer code was required to have a rudimentary computer. There was a time when Morse code was required to operate a radio. Today neither is even close to necessary. And even if it were, given today's technology, anyone can send 30 WPM if they can type that fast.

Or is the idea simply to make Amateur radio a hard club to join? To keep people out rather than welcome them in. If that is what you want, go join the Masons. They have a memorization exercise for you that will make your head spin. If you want better operators then complain to the FCC that there are not enough questions about proper operating procedures on the tests.

I welcome my no code friends to Amateur radio. They are honored, welcome and valued. If you, my friends, want them to learn code then put out a plate of cookies, get out your spare straight key and buzzer and sit down and practice with them. If you are not willing to do that then kindly let them alone.

Reply to a comment by : W9YW on 2019-11-11

Dear VK2MS, Code is not the substrate of the service. It was one hurdle of many to prove you could be trusted not to muck things up. The world will continue to become more diverse. Their values will vary from yours. I respect your history. The rest of us are re-inventing it every day. I lament some of the changes. Some are attempting to keep the amateur radio culture alive, and its ultimate aims *interesting*, convivial, constructive, and responsive to the world, given our talents. I'm a no-code licensee. I learned it long ago, but gave up the hobby after passing my Novice. I couldn't get the General wpm needed to pass that test and let it go. 40+ years later, I picked it up and learned it and hit 20wpm. I'm working on 30. I completely do not care if others do this or not; it's a personal challenge. Only few people sit for all three exams in the same day. Should they pass, good for them. I bear them no other distinction other that they're good and diligent operators. They come from all walks of life, all genders, colors, and shades of hair (if they have any). Doesn't matter to me, and it shouldn't matter to you. I don't fear them, and they shouldn't fear me. There should be no aristocracy in amateur radio. I didn't find much humor in the post. The continuing battle over Morse Code seems silly to me, but it's evidence of people getting stuck while other important issues become entropic-- like interference, spectrum abuse/misuse, and random acts of idiocy. Diligence and tenacity pays. 73 Tom W9YW
Reply to a comment by : VK2MS on 2019-11-11

Until perhaps the '60's an Amateur radio operator had to have substantial electronic engineering skills. Amongst his/her exam questions (here) was being asked him to design aspects of a receiver and transmitter. He had to be very familiar with ham conduct and the other aspects in tradition and emergency. He also had to pass a send and receive code exam. The "Z" calls, the VHF 'no code' promenaded themselves as the 'intelligentia' and wanted to take over, and did so, the WIA. VHF exploration was done well before they woke up one day and saw an opportunity to not have to learn Morse code, whereas SSB and Morse can be used on VHF.It is not excluded but when people think they are something really special 'god's gift' any evasion to promenade their special personage is ok...rings on bishops fingers, yamulkas, masonic signals, pig-Latin, tattoos, body jewellery, hoodies, confrontional hairdo's, pointy black beards...so on and on. The amateur service need for electronics skills declined as commercial receivers, transmitters, antenna systems became available and later affordable.A lot of amateur operators felt threatened with lowering standards to the Novice. Like the Foundation Licence the Novice was said to be an inspiration to achieve higher calls. Unlike the Novice the Foundation is just a pathetic machination to keep fees coming in , selling commercial gear and running 'electronics, courses. Of those three I applaud the last but the core of Amateur Radio, the exclusivity which led to equality in science inclusivity has passed. The excluding of Morse Code from most commercial aspects and emergency gave the evaders the opportunity to become 'Hams'. Many were, a reasonable guess and from my reading, were CB or illegal operators. Now all you needed was the ablity to recognise a PL259, resistor capacitor and coax, switch on a set and call CQ and reply. In other words a mildly glorified CB operator and too lazy or couldn't care-less or reactive to become a traditional Ham. What's a traditional ham??...never heard of that. As an instructor and examiner(whilst the WIA demanded we join it and took all the income whilst we paid the costs of doing it a favour ) I was reprimanded for introducing tradition, an aspiration for Code and proper 'on-air' conduct. Each visit to the club I hear foul-mouthed bullies ...supposedly licensed...on 2M duplex stirring up trouble. Suggestions 'real' hams tell them to back off, even shut down the repeater met with 'you can't tell other ham what to do'...well actually regulation once did and brother hams told what was then an occasional loud-mouth, the 'word'. Using the whatever amendment/s of the constitution the American "I have a right to a Ham Licence" commonly have a litany of excuses, reasons and sob-stories about learning code. It's just nonsense. They don't want to learn it so they don't. Like say Americans and Brits in France 'French is too hard...I can't learn it'...that's more nonsense. Code and language have methods which simplify expertise in them. Sandy Lynch's (SK) octogenarian grandmother competently learned the Code and used it. The Drover's dog could probably learn it if exceptionally disabled persons can't learn it then perhaps they should stay on CB...after all 100-500W has been used unlawfully for decades on CB. "Oh...but then they have to put up with the CB idiots'...yes...and the idiots should be excluded from the Amateur Service unless having reasonable electronic skills, operating manners and Code competency. You can't learn Code?? In the words of 'Big Daddy' Burl Ives "BULL". Mocking people who have allegiance to Ham tradition, manners, skills, exclusivity and Morse Code is easy, I can do it too, it only takes getting started but....with so many incredibly skilled hams, some young new, some older and aged the line should be clear...if you want to operate in the Ham Bands you have to deserve it in passing and utilising traditional skills. Any twit can buy...and perhaps most hams do...modern equipment join it up and call CQ. The skills can be shown in designing or building or renovating say tube sets, fixing test equipment, experimenting with traditional or new formula antennas. The Amateur Radio service was not like joining a sports club, it req
W9YW2019-11-11
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
Dear VK2MS,

Code is not the substrate of the service. It was one hurdle of many to prove you could be trusted not to muck things up. The world will continue to become more diverse. Their values will vary from yours. I respect your history.

The rest of us are re-inventing it every day. I lament some of the changes. Some are attempting to keep the amateur radio culture alive, and its ultimate aims *interesting*, convivial, constructive, and responsive to the world, given our talents.

I'm a no-code licensee. I learned it long ago, but gave up the hobby after passing my Novice. I couldn't get the General wpm needed to pass that test and let it go. 40+ years later, I picked it up and learned it and hit 20wpm. I'm working on 30. I completely do not care if others do this or not; it's a personal challenge.

Only few people sit for all three exams in the same day. Should they pass, good for them. I bear them no other distinction other that they're good and diligent operators. They come from all walks of life, all genders, colors, and shades of hair (if they have any). Doesn't matter to me, and it shouldn't matter to you. I don't fear them, and they shouldn't fear me. There should be no aristocracy in amateur radio.

I didn't find much humor in the post. The continuing battle over Morse Code seems silly to me, but it's evidence of people getting stuck while other important issues become entropic-- like interference, spectrum abuse/misuse, and random acts of idiocy.

Diligence and tenacity pays.

73 Tom W9YW
Reply to a comment by : VK2MS on 2019-11-11

Until perhaps the '60's an Amateur radio operator had to have substantial electronic engineering skills. Amongst his/her exam questions (here) was being asked him to design aspects of a receiver and transmitter. He had to be very familiar with ham conduct and the other aspects in tradition and emergency. He also had to pass a send and receive code exam. The "Z" calls, the VHF 'no code' promenaded themselves as the 'intelligentia' and wanted to take over, and did so, the WIA. VHF exploration was done well before they woke up one day and saw an opportunity to not have to learn Morse code, whereas SSB and Morse can be used on VHF.It is not excluded but when people think they are something really special 'god's gift' any evasion to promenade their special personage is ok...rings on bishops fingers, yamulkas, masonic signals, pig-Latin, tattoos, body jewellery, hoodies, confrontional hairdo's, pointy black beards...so on and on. The amateur service need for electronics skills declined as commercial receivers, transmitters, antenna systems became available and later affordable.A lot of amateur operators felt threatened with lowering standards to the Novice. Like the Foundation Licence the Novice was said to be an inspiration to achieve higher calls. Unlike the Novice the Foundation is just a pathetic machination to keep fees coming in , selling commercial gear and running 'electronics, courses. Of those three I applaud the last but the core of Amateur Radio, the exclusivity which led to equality in science inclusivity has passed. The excluding of Morse Code from most commercial aspects and emergency gave the evaders the opportunity to become 'Hams'. Many were, a reasonable guess and from my reading, were CB or illegal operators. Now all you needed was the ablity to recognise a PL259, resistor capacitor and coax, switch on a set and call CQ and reply. In other words a mildly glorified CB operator and too lazy or couldn't care-less or reactive to become a traditional Ham. What's a traditional ham??...never heard of that. As an instructor and examiner(whilst the WIA demanded we join it and took all the income whilst we paid the costs of doing it a favour ) I was reprimanded for introducing tradition, an aspiration for Code and proper 'on-air' conduct. Each visit to the club I hear foul-mouthed bullies ...supposedly licensed...on 2M duplex stirring up trouble. Suggestions 'real' hams tell them to back off, even shut down the repeater met with 'you can't tell other ham what to do'...well actually regulation once did and brother hams told what was then an occasional loud-mouth, the 'word'. Using the whatever amendment/s of the constitution the American "I have a right to a Ham Licence" commonly have a litany of excuses, reasons and sob-stories about learning code. It's just nonsense. They don't want to learn it so they don't. Like say Americans and Brits in France 'French is too hard...I can't learn it'...that's more nonsense. Code and language have methods which simplify expertise in them. Sandy Lynch's (SK) octogenarian grandmother competently learned the Code and used it. The Drover's dog could probably learn it if exceptionally disabled persons can't learn it then perhaps they should stay on CB...after all 100-500W has been used unlawfully for decades on CB. "Oh...but then they have to put up with the CB idiots'...yes...and the idiots should be excluded from the Amateur Service unless having reasonable electronic skills, operating manners and Code competency. You can't learn Code?? In the words of 'Big Daddy' Burl Ives "BULL". Mocking people who have allegiance to Ham tradition, manners, skills, exclusivity and Morse Code is easy, I can do it too, it only takes getting started but....with so many incredibly skilled hams, some young new, some older and aged the line should be clear...if you want to operate in the Ham Bands you have to deserve it in passing and utilising traditional skills. Any twit can buy...and perhaps most hams do...modern equipment join it up and call CQ. The skills can be shown in designing or building or renovating say tube sets, fixing test equipment, experimenting with traditional or new formula antennas. The Amateur Radio service was not like joining a sports club, it req
KJ4DGE2019-11-11
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
Any "twit" makes up the majority of new hams so that statement is somewhat a slap at new amateurs that perhaps never learned the code or simply don't want to learn. That being said for all the purists out there with a telegraph key, how many of YOU are willing to get on echolink, PSK31, Olivia or any of the other digital modes like morse that are being used by hams on a daily basis?

Morse code is fine if that is what someone want to use but because it originated a system does not make it the be all of communication. Someday after the end of the world when nobody can run down the road to HRO for a new rig we may hear a lone keyer tapping away on his code key hoping to hear another same individual to talk to, but I guess that would be a pretty singular conversation...

Reply to a comment by : KC7MF on 2019-11-10

VK2MS2019-11-11
Re: Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
...something happened to the ability to complete my dissertation....

The Amateur Radio service was not like joining a sports club, it required education, skill, application, self respect respect for others and respect for SWL's or people just listening-in on short wave. It wasn't controlled by some tweaking of the constitution and crocodile tears or even the mockery of Rick which I am loosely rejecting here. I admire enormously some of the people who have great skills and share them, I have less respect for the same types who become 'smarties' and I have little respect for the situation, as opposed to the personage, which has reduced the Amateur Radio Service to a commercialised multi-frequency CB radio 'thing'. The great thing about getting a licence was earning it and I know that were I tested in 1950, I'd have failed theory...or at least some of it. I made a point of doing all three licence grades on the one day and Morse Code in each. Had I had to do 30wpm or design a transmitter I'd have worked until I could. That today you can go up the road and buy all you need to start jabbering, never experimenting in any value, carry third party traffic, hog the bands (when propagation and American/Russian/Chinese/Indian etc. selfish mania demonstrated by space junk allows it (whether or not you think space junk affects HF or not) , would it not be a source of some personal pride and respect for the service to learn and use the old arts and skills which also keep us within the band-space (that's right...let's not go silly...into spark transmitters and the like and I say that only as it would cause such widespread interference, not because it would not be fun or traditional).It's perhaps too late to 'bring back the code' but we can bring it back effectively by learning it and using it, at least equally in time frame with vox when on air.
Reply to a comment by : KC7MF on 2019-11-10

VK2MS2019-11-11
Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...
Until perhaps the '60's an Amateur radio operator had to have substantial electronic engineering skills. Amongst his/her exam questions (here) was being asked him to design aspects of a receiver and transmitter. He had to be very familiar with ham conduct and the other aspects in tradition and emergency. He also had to pass a send and receive code exam. The "Z" calls, the VHF 'no code' promenaded themselves as the 'intelligentia' and wanted to take over, and did so, the WIA. VHF exploration was done well before they woke up one day and saw an opportunity to not have to learn Morse code, whereas SSB and Morse can be used on VHF.It is not excluded but when people think they are something really special 'god's gift' any evasion to promenade their special personage is ok...rings on bishops fingers, yamulkas, masonic signals, pig-Latin, tattoos, body jewellery, hoodies, confrontional hairdo's, pointy black beards...so on and on. The amateur service need for electronics skills declined as commercial receivers, transmitters, antenna systems became available and later affordable.A lot of amateur operators felt threatened with lowering standards to the Novice. Like the Foundation Licence the Novice was said to be an inspiration to achieve higher calls. Unlike the Novice the Foundation is just a pathetic machination to keep fees coming in , selling commercial gear and running 'electronics, courses. Of those three I applaud the last but the core of Amateur Radio, the exclusivity which led to equality in science inclusivity has passed. The excluding of Morse Code from most commercial aspects and emergency gave the evaders the opportunity to become 'Hams'. Many were, a reasonable guess and from my reading, were CB or illegal operators. Now all you needed was the ablity to recognise a PL259, resistor capacitor and coax, switch on a set and call CQ and reply. In other words a mildly glorified CB operator and too lazy or couldn't care-less or reactive to become a traditional Ham. What's a traditional ham??...never heard of that. As an instructor and examiner(whilst the WIA demanded we join it and took all the income whilst we paid the costs of doing it a favour ) I was reprimanded for introducing tradition, an aspiration for Code and proper 'on-air' conduct. Each visit to the club I hear foul-mouthed bullies ...supposedly licensed...on 2M duplex stirring up trouble. Suggestions 'real' hams tell them to back off, even shut down the repeater met with 'you can't tell other ham what to do'...well actually regulation once did and brother hams told what was then an occasional loud-mouth, the 'word'.

Using the whatever amendment/s of the constitution the American "I have a right to a Ham Licence" commonly have a litany of excuses, reasons and sob-stories about learning code. It's just nonsense. They don't want to learn it so they don't. Like say Americans and Brits in France 'French is too hard...I can't learn it'...that's more nonsense. Code and language have methods which simplify expertise in them. Sandy Lynch's (SK) octogenarian grandmother competently learned the Code and used it. The Drover's dog could probably learn it if exceptionally disabled persons can't learn it then perhaps they should stay on CB...after all 100-500W has been used unlawfully for decades on CB. "Oh...but then they have to put up with the CB idiots'...yes...and the idiots should be excluded from the Amateur Service unless having reasonable electronic skills, operating manners and Code competency. You can't learn Code?? In the words of 'Big Daddy' Burl Ives "BULL". Mocking people who have allegiance to Ham tradition, manners, skills, exclusivity and Morse Code is easy, I can do it too, it only takes getting started but....with so many incredibly skilled hams, some young new, some older and aged the line should be clear...if you want to operate in the Ham Bands you have to deserve it in passing and utilising traditional skills. Any twit can buy...and perhaps most hams do...modern equipment join it up and call CQ. The skills can be shown in designing or building or renovating say tube sets, fixing test equipment, experimenting with traditional or new formula antennas.

The Amateur Radio service was not like joining a sports club, it req
KC7MF2019-11-10
Morse Code: A Final Short Treatise On the History of Mr. Morse' Code...