- Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Friends Remembered
Survey Question

DX Cluster Spots

Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement

[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

FCC Administrative Law Judge Dismisses Ham's Long-Standing License Renewal:

from The ARRL Letter on July 12, 2018
View comments about this article!

FCC Administrative Law Judge Dismisses Radio Amateur's Long-Standing License Renewal Application:

A California man embroiled in a long-running license renewal proceeding has lost the next step in his fight to remain a radio amateur. In a July 9 Order, FCC Administrative Law Judge Richard L. Sippel terminated the decade-old license renewal application of William Crowell, W6WBJ (ex-N6AYJ), of Diamond Springs, California, upon a motion by Enforcement Bureau Chief Rosemary C. Harold. Sippel's Order followed Crowell's refusal to appear in Washington, DC, for a hearing to consider not just his license renewal but related enforcement issues dating back 15 years or more.

"Crowell's decision not to appear at the hearing has the same practical effect as if he had initially failed, pursuant to Section 1.221(c) of the Rules, to file a written notice of appearance or otherwise signal his intent to participate in the hearing on his pending renewal application, i.e., he has waived his right to prosecute that application," Harold said in the Enforcement Bureau's June 12 motion to dismiss Crowell's license renewal application.

In his Order, Sippel said he agreed with Harold's determination. Crowell had asserted that the FCC was obliged to hold field hearings in the city nearest to a licensee's residence, but Sippel said that was incorrect. Crowell invoked financial hardship rules, but Sippel said those would not apply in an Amateur Radio case. Dismissal of the renewal application was "with prejudice."

It has been 10 years since the FCC set Crowell's license renewal application for hearing, which was to center on whether he had violated FCC Part 97 rules in the early 2000s, in part by causing intentional interference, transmitting music, and "using indecent language," and whether he was qualified to have his renewal application granted.

Crowell raised the lengthy delay in his response to Harold's June 12 motion. "The more-than-10-year delay in holding a hearing herein (that's only since the Hearing Designation Order [was] issued; the pre-HDO part of the case goes back to 2000) violates my administrative due process rights," claimed Crowell, who is an attorney.

Crowell further claimed that most of the witnesses who might testify at a hearing are now deceased, and "the evidence is terribly stale." He said the Enforcement Bureau "has no excuse for not having taken this case to a hearing at a much earlier date, and, at this point, my ability to elucidate the truth has been fatally compromised."

Crowell was fined $25,000 in 2016 for intentionally interfering with the transmissions of other radio amateurs and transmitting prohibited communications, including music. The FCC said Crowell did not deny making the transmissions but argued, in large part, that those transmissions were protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution. The FCC turned away that assertion.

Sippel said he had stayed the renewal case on the basis of the pending Forfeiture Order proceeding, but said he was later informed that the US Department of Justice had decided not to prosecute the case.


The ARRL Letter

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
FCC Administrative Law Judge Dismisses Ham's Long-Standing L  
by AA7LX on July 13, 2018 Mail this to a friend!
I would tell the FCC to "Just follow up--each case in each order" otherwise, any lengthy delay makes the case easier to throw-out -or- to not prosecute; which seems the outcome with this case.
FCC Administrative Law Judge Dismisses Ham's Long-Standing L  
by KK6HUY on July 13, 2018 Mail this to a friend!
While I am grateful for the ruling, the sad reality of the situation is that the FCC, by failing to act for well over a decade and a half while this "gentleman" jammed WARFA and anyone else he felt like jamming, caused real damage not only to the long-suffering users and owners of the WARFA system but amateur radio itself. They levied fines, but then overturned themselves...they could have confiscated equipment and refused to consider it. If ever a case brought before the FCC called for mandatory, huge daily fines and maximum enforcement action, this was it. They failed. They failed utterly. The facts are plain to see: the FCC will not enforce violations, even gross violations of amateur practice. That's not a good place for the rest of us users to be in.

This, of course, is not the end. William Crowell will continue to jam, albeit now permanently unlicensed (case dismissed 'with prejudice'). I expect the FCC with then take another decade and a half to do anything about it. I'm sure Mr. Crowell expects exactly the same thing.
FCC Administrative Law Judge Dismisses Ham's Long-Standing L  
by KK6HUY on July 16, 2018 Mail this to a friend!
And...I was correct. Last night, Crowell was jamming WARFA. Again. Now with no license. How long is the FCC going to let him do this? (Likely answer, until he dies)

The takeaway here: don't bother getting licensed and ignore all the rules. Nothing will happen to you.
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Other News Articles
Amateur Radio Operators Needed to Help Communication After Michael:
Weather Forecasts from Space Could Help Protect Us from Solar Flares:
DX News -- ARRL DX Bulletin #43:
Just Ahead In Radiosport:
ARRL Executive Committee to Meet in Minneapolis: