Hello,
Many good thoughts here already. I have protective covenants with language akin to yours. No presentation per se for you but my approach for approval was good faith, stealthy design while seeking reasonable accommodation for a modest plan, pointing out my plan was consistent with local ordinances.
I started with what I was NOT going to do, e.g. pictures of big farms with yagis on towers. I presented one plan with multiple antenna options. I did earn approval for a modest mast on which a 6M ringo and an EF dipole is mounted. They did not go for inverted V dipoles. No trees to use. I have a couple of screwdriver types deck rail mounted as well, radial field out of scope for approval because they are ground staked, not viewable. These are all in back of the house and located so they cannot be seen from house front. The house apex is about 27’. It was important to approval that they they not be visible from house front, and I was able to meet that criteria.
Antennas in attic are or will include discone for V/UHF. Very happy with its performance. A 40/20M double bazooka is going up in attic in next weeks. Plans for amp are modest on presumption of RFIing neighbors and then sending myself out of approval.
I discussed flagpole options directly and approval point of view was that they could not restrict a flagpole even if it also had antenna purpose. YMMV on this. Turns out the screwdrivers were waaay less pricey, but that would have been “Plan B”.
Happy to discuss directly if desired, QRZ email good.
73 and good luck,
Chuck KC9QBY