... and the FTDX10 includes an external display port along with a LAN port and 2 more USB ports for mouse and keyboard.
So the FTDX10 is definitely a step up from the 7300. But first, let's see how its receiver architecture stacks up in Sherwood tests before getting too excited.
I finally got around to looking at the manual of the FTDX10, it reads much like my FTDX101MP manual. As an owner of the 101MP for a year, I am now quite familar with the way Yaesu does things in their new radios.
It seems to me that Yaesu took many many of the features of the 101 and put them into the 10. Menus are very similar. And let me talk about the menus.
As a very long time Icom user I was/am quite familiar with Icom menus. The menus in the 101MP are very easy to use and intuitive. All menu items are doable thru the touch screen which works very well. I would say that Icom menus are also very intuitive. Which is the winner? Neither. Both menu systems are more than adequate and easy to use for any
reasonably intelligent ham. Unfortunately we have hams that do not have the skills or intelligence to use menu systems of modern radios. From the FTDX10 manual I would say their menu system is just like the 101 but on a slightly smaller scale.
Whine all you want, like em or not but menu system radios are here to stay.
Concerning receiver architecture , we all know that the FTDX101 hybrid structure beat all other radios on Sherwoods List. Also the 101 has an extremely clean xmitter according to QST review Nov 2019.
Will the FTDX10 have some of these same attributes? I would expect the radio to be very competitive performance wise.
Now if you are a ham that sits on 160/75/40 mtrs AM/SSB bragging with your buddies about your Great 7-10khz tx audio and listening to rx audio thru an Ancient Marantz stereo while complaining about Dxers and Contesters screwing up the ham bands, look elsewhere for a radio instead of the FTDX10.

Stan K9IUQ