Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: For your continued amusement.  (Read 1232 times)

VE7RF

  • Member
  • Posts: 1609
For your continued amusement.
« on: September 16, 2022, 12:48:15 PM »

 Here is the German fellow's  website, where he offers everything from low to extreme high powered, fully built, and auto tune  capability.  He also sells  50 kw CCS (RTTY) baluns.  Most of his amplifiers are shipped to the USA.  The 2nd biggest  group that buys em, is in the middle east....where they are typ installed in air conditioned garages. 

Most of his amplifiers also have the mating schematics on his website.
Click on the English version, so you can read it.  Makes for fun reading.

http://www.dc9dz.de/en/tsunami100k.html
Logged

W7CXC

  • Member
  • Posts: 336
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2022, 12:54:20 PM »

Oh my! :)
Logged

KA4WJA

  • Posts: 1601
    • HomeURL
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2022, 03:13:47 PM »

Jim,
I remember reading of his original Dressler "Project Tsunami" (w/ 4cx10,000D), some 10 years ago....and the "upgraded" Tsunami (w/4cx15,000A) was one of favs back then (as I have a good working 4CX15000A sitting on my shelf....a "pull" out of a Harris 710, which had only ever been used at 10kw SSB service, so I suspect it still has many years left in it)

http://www.dc9dz.de/
http://www.dc9dz.de/de/tsunami60k.html


Some friends and I still talk about the "Dressler's" occasionally....
Although, I do try to point out that his "advertised outputs" are for SSB service only, and not really with good IMD taken into account...

{To put it bluntly, I'm not certain anyone should ever consider trying to get 60kw out of a single 4cx15000a, or 100kw out of a 4cw20,000....if you cut those power outputs by half, or so, that would be more "normal" and if you're unconcerned about IMD, maybe a bit more is doable....but, 60k outa a 4x15, not a good idea....I'd figure about 25kw - 30kw at best in SSB service, and for the big 4CX20,000 amp, plan on about 40kw, or so...}

Now, I see that he also includes output specs for CW and RTTY as well, so this is good....

But, I still have concern about stability at those gains and outputs quoted (for SSB service), as well as the IMD...
I mean, if you're going to run 13db to 16db to 18db, etc., over the US full-legal-limit (and likely a fairly decent antenna system), you damn well must have a clean signal!   So, if someone does wish to pony-up and buy some real power, please keep your signal clean!  :)


73,
John,  KA4WJA
Logged

KD6VXI

  • Member
  • Posts: 1022
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2022, 03:24:36 PM »

The trick to running the power levels he gets is elevated plate voltage.

Look at the plate modulated carrier level voltage.  Add 50 pct for a good tube.  In anode modulated service, the 4x15 runs 8kv at carrier.  That's 16kv plus depending on modulation level.  They get 23kw carrier.  That's 93kw at pep.   All being able to meet spec for occupied bandwidth.

So, run the tube at 12kv loaded.  It will do it.  You'd be amazed what 12kv at 12A ccs can do with a 3 tube rf deck. 😏

CBers are regularly running 3cx3000a7 tubes at 8kv.

Mine I run on 6kv loaded. Makes for easy peasy drive.  Into a dummy load, of course.

This can be done with filament tubes.  I don't recommend it with oxide tubes.  Tube elements placed too close together.

--Shane
WP2ASS / ex KD6VXI
Logged

W9IQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 8866
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2022, 03:57:27 PM »

That's 93kw at pep.   All being able to meet spec for occupied bandwidth.

What a disenguous statement.

- Glenn W9IQ
Logged
- Glenn W9IQ

God runs electromagnetics on Monday, Wednesday and Friday by the wave theory and the devil runs it on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday by the Quantum theory.

VE7RF

  • Member
  • Posts: 1609
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2022, 04:58:45 PM »

That's 93kw at pep.   All being able to meet spec for occupied bandwidth.

What a disenguous statement.

- Glenn W9IQ

Glen try picking up your dog eared Eimac high gloss catalog.

4x15 with class C....and plate modulated.   23.5 kw UN modulated CXR.  94 - 117.5 kw PEP output (100-125% modulation).  Every AM station in NA runs  125% positive modulation, which is the NRSC limit.

At just 100%  positive modulation, B+ will double.  The plate current also doubles.  Plate load Z stays the same.

In the case of his 4CX-20,000C amp, it's  16.97 kv loaded...at full power output.  But he's running it in class AB1. It's not being plate modulated.

Total V on the anode is a helluva lot higher than the loaded B+ on any GG amp, or plate modulated  class C tube.  The derived RF voltage in the output tank circuit will back feed through the plate block cap assy..and superimpose itself onto the anode. On a GG triode amp, the total V is just under double the loaded B+ voltage.   EG:  A L4B will have  4.5 kv on it's anode, when driven.  A good 3-500Z  will hi pot test to 16 kv.

IMD on his 4x20 amp is rated at -32 dbc.   and -50 dbc if pre-distortion is used.

However, I call BS on his claimed 100 kw pep output on SSB.  He only has a 30 kva CCS xfmr. On SSB, maybe 60 kw pep input..and 40 kw pep out.  (he rates it at 40 kw out on CW..and only 25 kw on RTTY).

Even W8JI manages to obtain stupid amounts of PO, from that 3 x 4CX-15,000  (11M)  amp on his FB page.
Logged

KC0W

  • Member
  • Posts: 1542
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2022, 05:53:35 PM »

 That guy in Florida with the HUGE antenna setup who runs his nightly 40 Meter DX Net has one of these amplifiers. He surreptitiously has a photo of it on his headache inducing QRZ page. I emailed him several times a few years ago when I was toying with the idea of purchasing one of these amplifiers............Never returned any of my emails. 

                                                                                        Tom KH0/KC0W
Logged

K6BRN

  • Member
  • Posts: 2231
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2022, 09:41:59 PM »

That's 93kw at pep.   All being able to meet spec for occupied bandwidth.

What a disenguous statement.

- Glenn W9IQ

"disingenuous?"

Quote
Adjective.  Meaning:  Dishonest

Brian - K6BRN
Logged

KD6VXI

  • Member
  • Posts: 1022
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2022, 04:27:52 AM »

That's 93kw at pep.   All being able to meet spec for occupied bandwidth.

- Glenn W9IQ
[/quote

As people here love to do, go read the spec.  23.5kw is the rated carrier power in plate modulated service.

You calling Eimac out for being full of it now?  Or saying that 100 pct am modulation of a 23.5kw carrier isn't the value I posted?

--Shane
WP2ASS /ex KD6VXI

What a disenguous statement.

]
Logged

KD6VXI

  • Member
  • Posts: 1022
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2022, 04:32:05 AM »

That's 93kw at pep.   All being able to meet spec for occupied bandwidth.

What a disenguous statement.

- Glenn W9IQ

Glen try picking up your dog eared Eimac high gloss catalog.

4x15 with class C....and plate modulated.   23.5 kw UN modulated CXR.  94 - 117.5 kw PEP output (100-125% modulation).  Every AM station in NA runs  125% positive modulation, which is the NRSC limit.

At just 100%  positive modulation, B+ will double.  The plate current also doubles.  Plate load Z stays the same.

In the case of his 4CX-20,000C amp, it's  16.97 kv loaded...at full power output.  But he's running it in class AB1. It's not being plate modulated.

Total V on the anode is a helluva lot higher than the loaded B+ on any GG amp, or plate modulated  class C tube.  The derived RF voltage in the output tank circuit will back feed through the plate block cap assy..and superimpose itself onto the anode. On a GG triode amp, the total V is just under double the loaded B+ voltage.   EG:  A L4B will have  4.5 kv on it's anode, when driven.  A good 3-500Z  will hi pot test to 16 kv.

IMD on his 4x20 amp is rated at -32 dbc.   and -50 dbc if pre-distortion is used.

However, I call BS on his claimed 100 kw pep output on SSB.  He only has a 30 kva CCS xfmr. On SSB, maybe 60 kw pep input..and 40 kw pep out.  (he rates it at 40 kw out on CW..and only 25 kw on RTTY).

Even W8JI manages to obtain stupid amounts of PO, from that 3 x 4CX-15,000  (11M)  amp on his FB page.

It's never the people whom have run extreme qro that argue about power output.  It's people that have built small amplifiers.

Remember the plywood box?  14kw on 40 meters with a ridiculously small xformer.  Measures was using iirc a 68 lb one?  SSB, unprocessed only.  But you saw the difference on the receive end.

Now we are going to argue with what Eimac recommends for their tubes.

--Shane
WP2ASS / ex KD6VXI
Logged

K1KIM

  • Member
  • Posts: 1556
    • HomeURL
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2022, 07:06:41 AM »

That tube is $6800 USD.


3X what my entire amp cost.
Logged
So Many Toys.......So Little Time!

KB8VUL

  • Member
  • Posts: 654
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2022, 08:40:57 AM »

That's 93kw at pep.   All being able to meet spec for occupied bandwidth.

What a disenguous statement.

- Glenn W9IQ

Glen try picking up your dog eared Eimac high gloss catalog.

4x15 with class C....and plate modulated.   23.5 kw UN modulated CXR.  94 - 117.5 kw PEP output (100-125% modulation).  Every AM station in NA runs  125% positive modulation, which is the NRSC limit.

At just 100%  positive modulation, B+ will double.  The plate current also doubles.  Plate load Z stays the same.

In the case of his 4CX-20,000C amp, it's  16.97 kv loaded...at full power output.  But he's running it in class AB1. It's not being plate modulated.

Total V on the anode is a helluva lot higher than the loaded B+ on any GG amp, or plate modulated  class C tube.  The derived RF voltage in the output tank circuit will back feed through the plate block cap assy..and superimpose itself onto the anode. On a GG triode amp, the total V is just under double the loaded B+ voltage.   EG:  A L4B will have  4.5 kv on it's anode, when driven.  A good 3-500Z  will hi pot test to 16 kv.

IMD on his 4x20 amp is rated at -32 dbc.   and -50 dbc if pre-distortion is used.

However, I call BS on his claimed 100 kw pep output on SSB.  He only has a 30 kva CCS xfmr. On SSB, maybe 60 kw pep input..and 40 kw pep out.  (he rates it at 40 kw out on CW..and only 25 kw on RTTY).

Even W8JI manages to obtain stupid amounts of PO, from that 3 x 4CX-15,000  (11M)  amp on his FB page.

It's never the people whom have run extreme qro that argue about power output.  It's people that have built small amplifiers.

Remember the plywood box?  14kw on 40 meters with a ridiculously small xformer.  Measures was using iirc a 68 lb one?  SSB, unprocessed only.  But you saw the difference on the receive end.

Now we are going to argue with what Eimac recommends for their tubes.

--Shane
WP2ASS / ex KD6VXI


You need to remember that you are presenting things here that are totally foreign to most.  And even sitting here commenting, I don't play at this level but at least DO understand it.  And as you have seen in other threads in here, if it's over the 1500 watt FCC mandated level of power output it gets poo pooed quick and some just loose their minds over it.

AM radio stations have been doing this crap since I don't know when.  Hell in the 30's and 40's WLW went to 500KW daytime operation.  And they stayed clean or the FCC would have shut them down.  But even now there are 50KW AM stations running 125% modulation and stay in their lane so to speak.  And there is no technical reason that a 100KW amp couldn't do that as well.  Not to mention stations like Radio America and others that were VERY high powered.  1.5 MW stuff with BIG ERP's, Acre's or antenna's and the like and they too 'stayed in their lane'. 

Are WE as hams suppose to be running these power levels, of course not.  But there are some that do.  A CB'er is NOT gonna bother to buy an amp that's built for running 3.5 to 30 so they can talk on CB channel 6.  Most of them believe that all that extra tuning capacitance and inductance in the Pi network reduces their power.  Which of course is nonsense, but they aren't looking to run clean for the most part, they just want to see the meter go farther to the right. 

And I don't think many even understand the power requirements for these amplifiers.  You mentioned the 3 tube 3CX15K box.  The filament on those requires 6.3 volts at 160 amps.  So three of them require 480 amps to heat up.  Before the plate supply is even turned on.  Running the math backwards, 6.3 volts at 480 amps is 3000 watts.  So the filament power requirement at 3000 watts is 12.6 amps at 240. But that ADD's to the plate supply requirement  which has to exceed the actual power output of the amp by some amount.  And at 100KW at 240 volts, that's 416 amps of input current.  The biggest residential power feed I ever saw was 400 amps on a HUGE all electric home.  And the power bill to run something like this would be stupid.  And NOT within the reach of someone that runs LMR400 instead of LDF4-50 heliax cable because they can't afford the hard line. 

And in truth, these discussions of why it's not possible, can't be done, it's illegal bore the hell out of me.  It's the same thing from the same people.  That either don't understand it, are jealous of it or just see a need to condemn it on it's face.  But by God, i bet every damn one of them would be swinging their beam if you were to announce that the 100KW amp is going to some uninhabited island that is in a grid square with no other people and it's getting activated.  Because THEN it's fine, there is no FCC or regulatory body to say you can't run 100KW on the ham bands.  And they will be the first ones to try to make contact with that expedition.
Logged

VE7RF

  • Member
  • Posts: 1609
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2022, 09:17:48 AM »

195 countries on the planet, and 194 don't have a 1.5 kw US limit.  Some are less, some are more...and some are a lot more.  In any commercial application, power is measured at the feed point.  Nobody measures power at the back of an amplifier...except in rare cases... like US amateur radio.

1.5 kw into stacked yagi's up 200' is...'ok'...... but 5 kw into a dipole is a ...'no-no'.  Gimme a break.  Who cares how you get ur  ERP. 
Logged

VE7RF

  • Member
  • Posts: 1609
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2022, 09:46:18 AM »

That's 93kw at pep.   All being able to meet spec for occupied bandwidth.

What a disenguous statement.

- Glenn W9IQ

Glen try picking up your dog eared Eimac high gloss catalog.

4x15 with class C....and plate modulated.   23.5 kw UN modulated CXR.  94 - 117.5 kw PEP output (100-125% modulation).  Every AM station in NA runs  125% positive modulation, which is the NRSC limit.

At just 100%  positive modulation, B+ will double.  The plate current also doubles.  Plate load Z stays the same.

In the case of his 4CX-20,000C amp, it's  16.97 kv loaded...at full power output.  But he's running it in class AB1. It's not being plate modulated.

Total V on the anode is a helluva lot higher than the loaded B+ on any GG amp, or plate modulated  class C tube.  The derived RF voltage in the output tank circuit will back feed through the plate block cap assy..and superimpose itself onto the anode. On a GG triode amp, the total V is just under double the loaded B+ voltage.   EG:  A L4B will have  4.5 kv on it's anode, when driven.  A good 3-500Z  will hi pot test to 16 kv.

IMD on his 4x20 amp is rated at -32 dbc.   and -50 dbc if pre-distortion is used.

However, I call BS on his claimed 100 kw pep output on SSB.  He only has a 30 kva CCS xfmr. On SSB, maybe 60 kw pep input..and 40 kw pep out.  (he rates it at 40 kw out on CW..and only 25 kw on RTTY).

Even W8JI manages to obtain stupid amounts of PO, from that 3 x 4CX-15,000  (11M)  amp on his FB page.

It's never the people whom have run extreme qro that argue about power output.  It's people that have built small amplifiers.

Remember the plywood box?  14kw on 40 meters with a ridiculously small xformer.  Measures was using iirc a 68 lb one?  SSB, unprocessed only.  But you saw the difference on the receive end.

Now we are going to argue with what Eimac recommends for their tubes.

--Shane
WP2ASS / ex KD6VXI



  A CB'er is NOT gonna bother to buy an amp that's built for running 3.5 to 30 so they can talk on CB channel 6.  Most of them believe that all that extra tuning capacitance and inductance in the Pi network reduces their power.  Which of course is nonsense, but they aren't looking to run clean for the most part, they just want to see the meter go farther to the right. 


Show me any 80-10m amp, or 160-10m amp that's anywhere near as efficient as a 10m monoband amp...they don't exist.  Even W4ETO / Alpha   told us all that.   Most of us have tried every trick in the book to achieve better tank eff on 10m, when using a 160-10m / 80-10m amp...with mediocre  results at best.   We went all out on buddy's 80-10m  YC-156 amp, pulling out all the stops. Everything in it was optimized correctly. Eff down on 10m.  I don't even include 10/12 m on hb amps anymore, wasted effort.

Faster to just build a 10m monoband amp...and re-use the fil / B+ supply from the existing 160-10 / 80-10m setup.   On buddy's  80-10m amp, he now wants 160m..which is very simple and straightforward. Everything can easily be optimized for 160m.  Cap's permanently padded, plate choke optimized, ditto with bypass caps, relays, tank coil etc, and no band switches anywhere.   Most bandswitch's are a joke on upper HF.  Band switches are rated for DC / 60 hz, not RF.  They have to be severely de-rated on upper HF..and also high duty cycle modes.  This is why multiple wafers are used in parallel.   And there is a trick to paralleling stuff...such that the current splits equally. 

If you think the total fil power is bad, add the blower load to the mix.  It's typ  HP rated.   Sky high cfm required..at insane back pressure requirements.   This is where you have to get innovative.   EC , instead of AC motors used, with way LESS current draw.  And chimney mounted between anode and top lid.... instead of anode to chassis.  This trick eliminates  the huge chassis restriction.   Instead, rows and rows of 3/4" holes are punched into the chassis...including below tank components..to cool them.  The only remaining path for air is up through the fins of the anode...and up through the chimney....and out the top of the  sealed RF cab.   Hot air is then exhausted / ducted to the outside in hot WX....and inside in winter.
Logged

KB8VUL

  • Member
  • Posts: 654
Re: For your continued amusement.
« Reply #14 on: September 17, 2022, 02:49:34 PM »

That's 93kw at pep.   All being able to meet spec for occupied bandwidth.


I will give you that they are a bit less efficient on the higher frequency bands.  But it's not even 3dB of loss. And when you are at 70dBm, why care.  But I agree that utilizing the existing HV supply for a second deck that is for one or two bands will level out the power output ability across the spectrum and at the point you are building with anything bigger than a 4CX3K the price really don't matter to the buyer.  Because you are not running 70dBm into a multiband anything.  It's monoband antennas and reasonably large feedline to deal with the power levels.

As mentioned elsewhere by me.  The plan going forward is a couple 4CX3K boxes for HF, VHF and UHF to run comfortably at 61dBm.  And like the AM 80 and 160 guys that retune broadcast transmitters for those bands and run them on low power, just because it CAN do more doesn't mean it has to. 
What a disenguous statement.

- Glenn W9IQ

Glen try picking up your dog eared Eimac high gloss catalog.

4x15 with class C....and plate modulated.   23.5 kw UN modulated CXR.  94 - 117.5 kw PEP output (100-125% modulation).  Every AM station in NA runs  125% positive modulation, which is the NRSC limit.

At just 100%  positive modulation, B+ will double.  The plate current also doubles.  Plate load Z stays the same.

In the case of his 4CX-20,000C amp, it's  16.97 kv loaded...at full power output.  But he's running it in class AB1. It's not being plate modulated.

Total V on the anode is a helluva lot higher than the loaded B+ on any GG amp, or plate modulated  class C tube.  The derived RF voltage in the output tank circuit will back feed through the plate block cap assy..and superimpose itself onto the anode. On a GG triode amp, the total V is just under double the loaded B+ voltage.   EG:  A L4B will have  4.5 kv on it's anode, when driven.  A good 3-500Z  will hi pot test to 16 kv.

IMD on his 4x20 amp is rated at -32 dbc.   and -50 dbc if pre-distortion is used.

However, I call BS on his claimed 100 kw pep output on SSB.  He only has a 30 kva CCS xfmr. On SSB, maybe 60 kw pep input..and 40 kw pep out.  (he rates it at 40 kw out on CW..and only 25 kw on RTTY).

Even W8JI manages to obtain stupid amounts of PO, from that 3 x 4CX-15,000  (11M)  amp on his FB page.

It's never the people whom have run extreme qro that argue about power output.  It's people that have built small amplifiers.

Remember the plywood box?  14kw on 40 meters with a ridiculously small xformer.  Measures was using iirc a 68 lb one?  SSB, unprocessed only.  But you saw the difference on the receive end.

Now we are going to argue with what Eimac recommends for their tubes.

--Shane
WP2ASS / ex KD6VXI



  A CB'er is NOT gonna bother to buy an amp that's built for running 3.5 to 30 so they can talk on CB channel 6.  Most of them believe that all that extra tuning capacitance and inductance in the Pi network reduces their power.  Which of course is nonsense, but they aren't looking to run clean for the most part, they just want to see the meter go farther to the right. 


Show me any 80-10m amp, or 160-10m amp that's anywhere near as efficient as a 10m monoband amp...they don't exist.  Even W4ETO / Alpha   told us all that.   Most of us have tried every trick in the book to achieve better tank eff on 10m, when using a 160-10m / 80-10m amp...with mediocre  results at best.   We went all out on buddy's 80-10m  YC-156 amp, pulling out all the stops. Everything in it was optimized correctly. Eff down on 10m.  I don't even include 10/12 m on hb amps anymore, wasted effort.

Faster to just build a 10m monoband amp...and re-use the fil / B+ supply from the existing 160-10 / 80-10m setup.   On buddy's  80-10m amp, he now wants 160m..which is very simple and straightforward. Everything can easily be optimized for 160m.  Cap's permanently padded, plate choke optimized, ditto with bypass caps, relays, tank coil etc, and no band switches anywhere.   Most bandswitch's are a joke on upper HF.  Band switches are rated for DC / 60 hz, not RF.  They have to be severely de-rated on upper HF..and also high duty cycle modes.  This is why multiple wafers are used in parallel.   And there is a trick to paralleling stuff...such that the current splits equally. 

If you think the total fil power is bad, add the blower load to the mix.  It's typ  HP rated.   Sky high cfm required..at insane back pressure requirements.   This is where you have to get innovative.   EC , instead of AC motors used, with way LESS current draw.  And chimney mounted between anode and top lid.... instead of anode to chassis.  This trick eliminates  the huge chassis restriction.   Instead, rows and rows of 3/4" holes are punched into the chassis...including below tank components..to cool them.  The only remaining path for air is up through the fins of the anode...and up through the chimney....and out the top of the  sealed RF cab.   Hot air is then exhausted / ducted to the outside in hot WX....and inside in winter.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up