Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: $35 license fee and new ham influx  (Read 820 times)

K4FMH

  • Member
  • Posts: 681
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2022, 01:59:56 PM »

...
Today you buy it, plug it in and do FT8.
Gary W0CKI

How sad. And untrue.
Many come to the hobby from an electronics or engineering career.
Some from the military.
Some just because they're smart.
As the nation goes- so goes the hobby: dumber
And yes, it IS a hobby. Long, LONG gone are the days when the amateur radio ranks was considered a repository of talent in times of national need.
Why just last night I was listening to a couple guys talking about 'The League' - one wondering when 'The League' invented ham radio. I felt like keying up and explaining that 'The League' did much more than that: they invented electromagnetism.
But I digress.
Chuck
dit dit

Chuck,

This Maxim Mythology is far from true. Clarence Tuska taught Hiram Maxim about wireless telegraphy. Tuska learned about the cutting edge from Hugo Gernsback, from whom he bought his parts for Maxim’s first radio. Gernsback organized the very first national wireless group, years before the ARRL was an idea.

73,

Frank
K4FMH
Logged

K1VSK

  • Member
  • Posts: 1947
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2022, 05:07:28 PM »

Our club's VE team conducts test sessions several times a year. Our average number of test candidates range from 4-10 people, both walk-ins and reserved seats. Our September session had only one person test and pass their Tech test. Our November test session which is on the 19th, so far has not a single person reserve a seat or inquire about the test.

Has anyone who conducts in-person test sessions experienced a drop in the number of people who want to get their ham license because of the now required $35 license fee? I think its very unusual to suddenly see no interest in getting a ham license just because a person has to pay $35 for their first license.

While I have no personal knowledge of license trends post the $35 fee, I don’t believe “free” was ever any incentive to pass a simple test and neither is it reasonable to believe $35 is an obstacle to a not inexpensive hobby.
Logged

G8FXC

  • Member
  • Posts: 533
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #17 on: November 13, 2022, 11:42:34 PM »

...Sorry but it has everything to do with the subject. Perhaps you should read the title. The only sad part is the truth, the public view of hams is the same as CB operators.
I think "the public view of hams" is zero - most of them are not aware that we exist. CB is better known - if only via wacky movies.

Martin (G8FXC)
Logged

K7MEM

  • Member
  • Posts: 1058
    • JavaScript Electronic Notebook
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2022, 01:34:21 AM »

I think "the public view of hams" is zero - most of them are not aware that we exist. CB is better known - if only via wacky movies.

How true. When I moved to my current location, I installed a 43' ground mounted vertical in the back yard. The neighbor behind me was curious and asked me about it. So I simply told them that, I was a amateur radio operator and it was my transmitting antenna. The neighbors daughter (mid 20s) then wanted to know what AM or FM channel I was broadcasting on so she could listen to me.

Maybe it's time for me to get my groove on with some low powered AM or FM. I still have lots of vinyl. Clap for the Wolfman. "Aaaoooooo! All right, baby. Have mercy!"
Logged
Martin - K7MEM
http://www.k7mem.com

AF5CC

  • Posts: 1664
    • HomeURL
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #19 on: November 18, 2022, 08:38:05 AM »

It does seem that more extra class 1 x 2 and 2 x 1 calls have remained available once the fee was started.  I guess it has cut down on people changing callsigns weekly and forming a dozen clubs on paper so they can have an extra class callsign for each one.  You have to pay the fee when you apply for a vanity call, and you no longer get it refunded if your choice isn't issued.

73 John AF5CC
Logged

KC3TEC

  • Posts: 150
    • HomeURL
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #20 on: November 18, 2022, 05:39:19 PM »

yeah so many people complained about the fee raise.
But that just for the first test and frn registration.
upgrading a license is still free.
but even at $35.00 for a 10 year license
thats only $3.50 a year
darn cheap if you ask me.
I dont think it negatively affects the influx of new hams,
only the complacency and curmudgeon factor will do that.

whats amusing is many of those who complained about the fee increase most likely have thousands invested in their shack and antennas. :o
Logged

W7XTV

  • Member
  • Posts: 1269
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #21 on: November 18, 2022, 06:09:40 PM »

but even at $35.00 for a 10 year license
thats only $3.50 a year
darn cheap if you ask me.

The $9 fee for a 5-year license in the 1970s was far more expensive than this $35 for 10 years when you account for inflation.  $9 then is roughly $75 now.  Double that for a 10-year term, and you have $150 in 2022 dollarettes, compared to the $35 we actually pay.
Logged
He speaks fluent PSK31, in FT8...  One QSO with him earns you 5BDXCC...  His Wouff Hong has two Wouffs... Hiram Percy Maxim called HIM "The Old Man..."  He is... The Most Interesting Ham In The World!

N2EY

  • Member
  • Posts: 5698
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #22 on: November 22, 2022, 01:26:32 PM »


The $9 fee for a 5-year license in the 1970s was far more expensive than this $35 for 10 years when you account for inflation.  $9 then is roughly $75 now.  Double that for a 10-year term, and you have $150 in 2022 dollarettes, compared to the $35 we actually pay.

That's about right - depends on what inflation calculator and original year you use.

But there's more!!!

Back in the 1970s, there were fees for new licenses, renewals, and modifications - including upgrades. (The Novice was free, but the other licenses weren't). You paid the fee for every test, pass or fail.

Today, test fees are set by the VECs, with a maximum set by FCC. Some VECs charge the maximum, some less, some are free. Modifications are free, too.

And then, effective January 1, 1977, all fees for US amateur licenses were dropped.

73 de Jim, N2EY
Logged

K6CPO

  • Member
  • Posts: 838
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #23 on: November 22, 2022, 01:45:52 PM »


No, he said only one took the test and passed. I do agree that America has certainly been dumbed down.

This is because all the snowflakes won't feel left out because they can't graduate from school on their own merit.

Given the competency, knowledge, and age demonstrated by most hams, they ought to do away with the test and just make it an application fee.

The ultimate snowflake move...
Logged

K4KYV

  • Member
  • Posts: 130
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #24 on: February 14, 2023, 04:53:10 PM »

Most of those who posted to this thread seem to have missed the point entirely.  The measly $35 is NOT the issue.  The issue is the convoluted series of hoops one has to jump through to actually make the payment and complete the process.
Logged

VE3WGO

  • Member
  • Posts: 666
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #25 on: February 14, 2023, 06:59:17 PM »

...  the convoluted series of hoops one has to jump through to actually make the payment and complete the process.

Seems to be a form of competence test, don't you think?    Not a bad idea for a technical hobby!

73, Ed
Logged

AI5BC

  • Posts: 456
    • HomeURL
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #26 on: February 15, 2023, 06:54:56 AM »

  The issue is the convoluted series of hoops one has to jump through to actually make the payment and complete the process.
Yep it can be tough on a Boomer to think, follow instructions, and use logic.
Logged

N2EY

  • Member
  • Posts: 5698
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #27 on: March 25, 2023, 10:09:39 AM »

Most of those who posted to this thread seem to have missed the point entirely.  The measly $35 is NOT the issue.  The issue is the convoluted series of hoops one has to jump through to actually make the payment and complete the process.

Exactly right!

It's almost as if FCC doesn't want new amateurs, nor existing ones to renew....

73 de Jim, N2EY
Logged

W6BP

  • Member
  • Posts: 629
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #28 on: March 26, 2023, 12:06:58 PM »

Most of those who posted to this thread seem to have missed the point entirely.  The measly $35 is NOT the issue.  The issue is the convoluted series of hoops one has to jump through to actually make the payment and complete the process.

Exactly right!

It's almost as if FCC doesn't want new amateurs, nor existing ones to renew....

73 de Jim, N2EY

If the FCC doesn't want new amateurs, they're doing a bad job of discouraging applicants. I've been tracking the folks who've applied for new licenses through our VE group, and have found that almost all of them -- young, old, and in-between -- have had no problem figuring out how to get an FRN to take the test and pay the $35 dollar fee after passing the test. And those who are upgrading see their new license class appear in the FCC database with no further action needed on the applicant's part.

It seems to me that it's just the renewal process that's snake-bit. And even then, people who take the time to call the FCC seem to get the assistance they need.  According to the ARRL, the FCC Licensing Support Center can be reached at 877-480-3201 (Mon.-Fri. 8 a.m.-6 p.m. ET). I wish they'd put this number on their home page in large print.
Logged

KC3TEC

  • Posts: 150
    • HomeURL
Re: $35 license fee and new ham influx
« Reply #29 on: March 27, 2023, 09:51:46 AM »

Yeah we all know that the process changes like that are designed to keep fcc employees in their jobs rather than being replaced by an automated computer system.
Much of what they are doing is being done by automation already.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up