I sure would like to hear someone's reasoning why they think the proposal is bad. It's much broader in antenna protection than the version that got killed a couple of years ago.
So, what's wrong with this proposal?
Not “gripes” but your implication by labeling any contrary judgment as such is telling.
I wonder how many actually read the Bill. It isn’t fundamentally different than past iterations but now comes with the fancy but misleading title like a lot of other Bills which have little to do with either the intent or substance.
Essentially, it is a performance standard rather than a definition of what is a “reasonable” antenna. That concept is an improvement on its predecessors. For example, it stipulates “not visible from the street” similar to the standard our HOA has.
What people likely haven’t thought through is the unintended consequence(s) should the next Congress enact something similar. For example, it forces an HOA to write prescriptive rules rather than allow flexibility. And HOAs generally aren’t that interested in accommodating antennas.
One certainty - it is unlikely to remain in its current form through the legislative process and isn’t being pushed by either homeowner’ associations or HOA residents which has historically meant failure to answer the two threshold questions legislators always ask - what is the need and how many people benefit?