Useful tool for site selection!
The main drawback is that a ground probe samples only the surface soil. If the ground characteristics change with depth, you won't know about it. But your antenna will. It's surprising how far the fields from an antenna penetrate ground in some cases. It varies with frequency and ground characteristics, but it can be tens of feet. Not all ground is inhomogeneous, and even when it is, the characteristics of the soil can be expected to bear
some relation to what's below. Most antenna models are not critically sensitive to ground quality. It affects them much less than even small changes in antenna dimensions. Getting permittivity and conductivity values within the ball park is often good enough.
To give you some idea of where you stand, the program reports and plots skin depth, the distance where antenna current drops to 37% of its surface value. Most of the effect of ground occurs above this point. Some people use two skin depths (13.5%) to be conservative. So if the skin depth is 3 feet, you can feel more confidence in the numbers a foot-long probe provides than if it is 60 feet.
There are ways to probe the ground at depth, such as measuring the impedance of a carefully constructed test dipole at a well-defined height, but they are narrowband, not portable, and tedious to build. See the Low Dipole section here:
http://ham-radio.com/k6sti/hifer.htmBrian