Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12   Go Down

Author Topic: CY0S Thread  (Read 3542 times)

N0UN

  • Posts: 924
    • eHam Forums are a waste of time
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #120 on: March 27, 2023, 07:40:47 AM »

Fortunately there are no "good for nothing 3Y0J joking pilots" talking of ONE QSO only

I take it you haven't seen the actual "order" from a 3Y0J Team Member to that pilot?  It exists in Messenger snapshots, I've seen them all, and I have them all.

That pilot is a friend of mine (for decades) and I can assure you he did exactly what he was asked to do. And he did it well.

There are people that know, and there are people that don't.  You're in the latter.

NØUN
Wayne,
All I KNOW is that in accordance with the pilot's request after 30m QSO I quit calling missing the chance for a needed 17m QSO. You did NOT and have 17m QSO confirmed. What's the value of those secret Messenger snapshots of yours?
Then I found out from the team leader that ONE QSO request never existed. Whom do I need to believe?
What I know for sure is that if there were no pilots, video interviews and tons of published pictures VK6CQ and other envious trolls would have no food.
Pozdrowienia ze Lwowa
 
 

More like you would have no food.

You call my friend "good for nothing", and now you call out my 17M insurance Q with 3Y0J?

Here Mr. Ukrainian, I call bullshit on you stopping after your 30M Q. That's why you worked them a second time on 30 Meters CW?



Here's what I know for sure - don't cut off the hands that feed you & don't call my friend (who did an exceptional job relaying the info given him) "good for nothing".

NØUN
Logged

VA3VF

  • Member
  • Posts: 4509
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #121 on: March 27, 2023, 09:44:21 AM »

More 17m contacts uploaded to ClubLog. Mine is there now.

Hoping to get a 12m contact completed. Four "bites" so far but no RR73.
Logged

KB2FCV

  • Member
  • Posts: 3285
    • homeURL
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #122 on: March 27, 2023, 10:25:31 AM »

Anyone work CY0S on 17m FT8 today or Yesterday and see there Q in the log ??

I worked them yesterday on 17m... but they were suspiciously strong. I'm too close where their skip goes well over on bands like 17m and they had 4 very strong streams. WFWL, but I have a feeling I possibly worked a pirate. If it wasn't a pirate - then it was interesting band conditions!

Well I'll be darned. My 17m QSO was good. I guess 17m must have a skip pattern that hits my house lol. Like each of their 4 threads were like +9 each. Just looking today they are +4 on each thread. I could barely hear them on 20m or 15m. 17m... Ray gun.
Logged

KD8MJR

  • Member
  • Posts: 6017
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #123 on: March 27, 2023, 02:10:17 PM »

One thing I do know for sure is that 3Y0J put an official message out that people should not make more than one contact.  I will really be pissed off if Ken or anybody else in charge tries to revise history and make it sound like that did not happen! >:(
 Had I known what I know now I would have duped all my contacts four or five times.
Logged
“A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”  (Mark Twain)

KD8MJR

  • Member
  • Posts: 6017
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #124 on: March 27, 2023, 02:11:30 PM »

While I can still fond CY0S on Club Log search I am puzzled that it is no longer on the main DXpedition page.
Logged
“A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”  (Mark Twain)

EI2GLB

  • Member
  • Posts: 1252
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #125 on: March 27, 2023, 03:15:09 PM »

Michael from Clublog said elsewhere that it's something to do with it being an old callsign and QSO's older than 12 months in the log ECT,

If you click on the full list it is still there,

He didn't mention a fix for the issue,

While I can still fond CY0S on Club Log search I am puzzled that it is no longer on the main DXpedition page.
Logged

AD8FD

  • Posts: 2
    • HomeURL
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #126 on: March 27, 2023, 03:41:57 PM »

Clublog split the expeditions into two parts: Expeditions and Special Callsigns.  Callsigns with QSOs older than 6 months are moved to the Special Callsigns page, CY0S has QSOs going back to 2021.

Near the top of the Expeditions page is a link to the Special Callsigns page and CY0S is listed there and you can access all the same statistics as Expeditions.

https://clublog.org/specialcalls.php
Logged

KD8MJR

  • Member
  • Posts: 6017
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #127 on: March 27, 2023, 04:17:44 PM »

Michael from Clublog said elsewhere that it's something to do with it being an old callsign and QSO's older than 12 months in the log ECT,

If you click on the full list it is still there,

He didn't mention a fix for the issue,

While I can still fond CY0S on Club Log search I am puzzled that it is no longer on the main DXpedition page.

Thanks for that.  I found it.
Logged
“A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”  (Mark Twain)

W2IRT

  • Member
  • Posts: 4229
    • What I do for fun
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #128 on: March 27, 2023, 06:37:37 PM »

From those "one of those days" files. I was waiting on 60m tonight for CY0S to show up. They did, and I was the first station they replied to with a signal report...then either my software or the radio screwed up and I was unable to give them my 73 message. I saw them calling me a few times before giving up and there was nothing I could do. The radio just failed to switch into TX. It took me an hour to fix it and I'm able to call again, but now I can't get through. Gaah. That's the last band I needed them on too! Thankfully it doesn't count for DXCC, but I would love to know what caused the problem so it never happens again; it's happened several times in the last month.
Logged
www.facebook.com/W2IRT
Night gathers and now my watch begins. It shall not end until I reach Top of the Honor Roll

Great times are at hand, and soon there will be DX for all—although more for some than for others.

K0RS

  • Member
  • Posts: 1501
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #129 on: March 27, 2023, 08:19:06 PM »

The radio just failed to switch into TX.  ...it's happened several times in the last month.

My software will do that too.  It's usually after I click "halt" in order to find a clear frequency and then hit "enable" to call again.  So far, it's only missed one cycle and then behaves normally.  I have had the RX hang and had to reboot WSJT to get the print started again.  WSJT likes my radio to be online when it opens or sometimes it won't find it.

I did finally get him on 60m, but it was one of the toughest pileups for him yet.  Man, lots of guys calling.  To make matters worse the band wasn't really open here yet when I first tuned to 60.  His signal did finally build up to around a -14 or -15 and I finally got through.  Hard to believe the demand is so high on 60m.  He obviously was hearing EU as well as NA, so that was a further complication.  Everyone was saying "MSHV," but I only got him after I switched to F/H.  That's happened on a couple of other bands too.
Logged
"90% of the people in a pile-up have no idea what's going on.  It's up to you to be in the remaining 10%."  *W9KNI*

KE8KMX

  • Posts: 265
    • HomeURL
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #130 on: March 28, 2023, 03:23:27 AM »

From those "one of those days" files. I was waiting on 60m tonight for CY0S to show up. They did, and I was the first station they replied to with a signal report...then either my software or the radio screwed up and I was unable to give them my 73 message. I saw them calling me a few times before giving up and there was nothing I could do. The radio just failed to switch into TX. It took me an hour to fix it and I'm able to call again, but now I can't get through. Gaah. That's the last band I needed them on too! Thankfully it doesn't count for DXCC, but I would love to know what caused the problem so it never happens again; it's happened several times in the last month.


They are operating in F/H mode.   THey don't need your 73.  Guess I got lucky last night and was able to work them on 60m  after only about 5 min of calling.  They have not uploaded any 60m q's to clublog yet but I got a 73 from them so I expect to be in their log.  I worked them 5 other bands ft8 set to hound, got their 73 but never sent them one and I made their log every time.    60m will make 10 bands for me but I am still holding out hope that I can get them on 6m.  Time is running out.


Gino - KE8KMX
Logged

W1VT

  • Member
  • Posts: 6070
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #131 on: March 28, 2023, 04:35:45 AM »

Heard them make a few 6M meteor scatter contacts!  Very slow mode, just a few contacts per hour in the morning and even slower  in the evening, due to the way meteors collide with the Earth.
Logged

K5PS

  • Member
  • Posts: 691
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #132 on: March 28, 2023, 07:37:49 AM »

60m Qs are now in ClubLog.
Logged
All generalizations are false

KM4SII

  • Member
  • Posts: 1129
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #133 on: March 28, 2023, 07:43:29 PM »

After working them on 80m FT8 tonight, I essentially have a clean sweep of all modes on all bands 80-12m (plus a 60m FT8 QSO as a bonus) .... I am now only missing 12m SSB.

Unfortunately, 10m has been a bit of a challenge and I have yet to be able to work them there. They had a reasonable signal there during the first day or two of the DXpedition, but the pileups were too large for me to break. After that, I have not heard a single peep out of them on 10m, even when they are loud on 12m. I suppose I am just a bit too close. Hopefully I get an opening before they go QRT!

73
Mason - KM4SII
Logged

N4UFO

  • Member
  • Posts: 1170
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #134 on: March 28, 2023, 11:12:52 PM »

After that, I have not heard a single peep out of them on 10m, even when they are loud on 12m. I suppose I am just a bit too close. Hopefully I get an opening before they go QRT!

And now you know why I only needed Sable on 10m this go around... I could never work previous DXpeditions to Sable from NC on 10m. But I got'em now!!!  :D  GL!!!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12   Go Up