Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11   Go Down

Author Topic: CY0S Thread  (Read 3306 times)

WO7R

  • Member
  • Posts: 6032
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #30 on: March 22, 2023, 11:21:09 AM »

Quote
I worked them on 40 cw yesterday, but no qsos in the log for 40 meters, was it a pirate?

The last I looked, about an hour ago, they still had only uploaded the early 30/17 stuff and not later operations.  That will change.

Wait a day or two and see.
Logged

W1VT

  • Member
  • Posts: 6067
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #31 on: March 22, 2023, 11:46:01 AM »

Clublog lists the time and date of the last QSO in the upload.
Some operations take extra time to upload logs for certain bands or modes.
There is a statistics page where you can get an idea what has been uploaded.

I recently did an OQRS and got the CW contest QSOs confirmed 36 hours after the FT8 contacts.
Logged

KD6KVL

  • Member
  • Posts: 225
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #32 on: March 22, 2023, 11:48:29 AM »

Another thing I've noticed:
The last date and time of the QSO applies to the logs uploaded but with multi-stations and multiple computers, it may not reflect all qso's.  I've run into that a lot and then my qso shows up.  VK9 recently had that....
Frank KG6N
Logged
Frank KG6N

KM4SII

  • Member
  • Posts: 1128
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #33 on: March 22, 2023, 12:09:36 PM »

I worked them on 40 cw yesterday, but no qsos in the log for 40 meters, was it a pirate?
The log was just updated, but you are not in the log on 40m CW. My 40m CW QSO from last night is there so most likely you worked a pirate, or your call was busted.
Logged

N5CM

  • Member
  • Posts: 893
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #34 on: March 22, 2023, 12:21:35 PM »

In the log on 17, 30, and 160 CW.  Thus far unable to get through on 12, 15, and 40 CW.  40 was very crowded last night.
Logged

WO7R

  • Member
  • Posts: 6032
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #35 on: March 22, 2023, 12:27:09 PM »

Quote
The log was just updated, but you are not in the log on 40m CW. My 40m CW QSO from last night is there so most likely you worked a pirate, or your call was busted.

Unfortuantely, Mason is almost certainly correct.  I just looked and all my own QSOs are uploaded, regardless of band or mode.

The most recent was at 22-Mar at 17:10z.  That is not to say absolutely every QSO has been uploaded.  As has been pointed out, on large DXpeditions, there are multiple stations, multiple computers, and multiple logs.  Collecting these for upload is a task, but a lower priority one and have gaps depending on how they are aggregated.  But, the correct bet is, alas, "not in log".

Work an "insurance" contact on 40 because it probably isn't "insurance".
Logged

KE4YD

  • Member
  • Posts: 153
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #36 on: March 22, 2023, 12:38:36 PM »

Just checked clublog and all QSO's were there. 3 new band fills 10, 15 and 160 meter CW. Also 30 meter CW which my only prior contact was 30 meter RTTY.
So I'm done unless a miracle happens and 6 meters opens up. Lets hope so.
73,
David KE4YD
Logged

N4UFO

  • Member
  • Posts: 1168
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #37 on: March 22, 2023, 12:58:54 PM »

I'm trying to work them on 10m FT8 right now... (10m is the last HF band I need CY0 on) They are very strong with 5 or so streams. Then they will go a cycle with nothing... then a couple more cycles transmitting... then one, even two with nothing. It doesn't act like propagation fading as it's all or nothing.

I've not seen this before... any 'informed' guesses as to what is going on?  Thanks

EDIT: Someone just posted on the cluster "TX audio issues" and I put on my headphones... yeah, sounds weird. Something not right there. They may be trying to fix it. But despite the issues they are working stations all over the globe!
« Last Edit: March 22, 2023, 01:05:24 PM by N4UFO »
Logged

WG5G

  • Member
  • Posts: 246
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #38 on: March 22, 2023, 01:03:46 PM »

To IW0HQE, you are in the 9X5RU log on 40 cw, people were spotting
CY0S on 7.025 when it was actually 9X5RU.

Dan WG5G
Logged

KD6KVL

  • Member
  • Posts: 225
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #39 on: March 22, 2023, 01:10:56 PM »

10m FT8 was a few calls about an hour ago...They should all be that easy!
Frank KG6N
Logged
Frank KG6N

N4UFO

  • Member
  • Posts: 1168
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #40 on: March 22, 2023, 01:23:16 PM »

Seems like maybe they are overdriving the audio into the radio... but either way, I moved down lower in the waterfall and shortly thereafter I got a call... then a very long and suspenseful two cycles of nothing... and FINALLY an RR73. <Whew!> had me worried there...  ;)
Logged

VA3VF

  • Member
  • Posts: 4509
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #41 on: March 22, 2023, 02:28:12 PM »

Finally got them on 20m, after many hours. Some strange things happening. This makes 2 bands worked.
Logged

NU1O

  • Member
  • Posts: 5109
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #42 on: March 22, 2023, 03:22:02 PM »

Seems like maybe they are overdriving the audio into the radio... but either way, I moved down lower in the waterfall and shortly thereafter I got a call... then a very long and suspenseful two cycles of nothing... and FINALLY an RR73. <Whew!> had me worried there...  ;)

Same thing happened with my QSO.
Logged

KM4SII

  • Member
  • Posts: 1128
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #43 on: March 22, 2023, 03:23:42 PM »

There are issues on 20m FT8 -- more than just the time sync. I described it in detail on their Facebook group if anyone is interested, but the main takeaway is that they do not seem to be hearing callers in the upper part of the pileup. If you have your VFO set to something like 14091.3 as I did, you need to call below 1600 or so. I was calling above that for HOURS without getting a response. As soon as I moved to nearly on CY0S' frequency, I was answered straight away. To think of all that time I wasted...  :P

Oh well, at least I am finally in the log!
Logged

WO7R

  • Member
  • Posts: 6032
Re: CY0S Thread
« Reply #44 on: March 22, 2023, 03:28:39 PM »

Hmmm.  Maybe this explains why I've had most of my success on CW this time around.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11   Go Up