Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ft-920 versus IC-756  (Read 6427 times)

114

  • Member
  • Posts: 13
Ft-920 versus IC-756
« on: September 12, 2003, 07:03:39 PM »

I am considering one or the other any suggestions
or opinions would be help. Before it causes any feedback, I choose not to give my call sign over the internet.Thanks to all in advance.
Logged

OBSERVER11

  • Member
  • Posts: 657
Ft-920 versus IC-756
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2003, 10:58:54 AM »

then do not expect answers about TRANSMITTERS
Logged

114

  • Member
  • Posts: 13
Ft-920 versus IC-756
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2003, 12:41:57 PM »

Its funny I dont see your call sign anywhere. It seems to me that you are one of those people that think you are GODs answer to ham radio and a know it all. Thank
god ther are not many of you out there.
Logged

OBSERVER11

  • Member
  • Posts: 657
Ft-920 versus IC-756
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2003, 08:57:32 PM »

well, yes, I am...

If you want to know an answer about a transmitter, supply a callsign and you will get an answer. I do not need a call sign to give you one, but you need one to get one.
Logged

114

  • Member
  • Posts: 13
Ft-920 versus IC-756
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2003, 09:28:03 PM »

I already got the IC-756 with out your glorious help.
What an idiot.
Logged

OBSERVER11

  • Member
  • Posts: 657
Ft-920 versus IC-756
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2003, 09:38:06 PM »

just remember that CB is 26.965 to 27.405
Logged

OBSERVER11

  • Member
  • Posts: 657
Ft-920 versus IC-756
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2003, 08:58:37 AM »

whats the matter with the 756?? Now you want a Kenwood eh?

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up