Shane, you asked for an opinion, so here it is.....
The suggestion to roll your own, is probably the best. Materials are inexpensive and information abounds. Plus, you will have the satisfaction of 'bragging rights'. If you're not mechanically inclined (that's fine), there are several commercial sources of antennas. I have always liked Cushcraft. The antennas are quite simple and rugged. I have had several CC 6 meter antennas, including several I 'redesigned' and made into long 7 element yagis. They worked well.
When I moved to this location, I put the 7 element antenna up, then modified it according to W3CCX (club station) suggestions, using Yagi Optimizer. This reduced it to a 5 el with a shorter boom. It worked well with the Gamma match and Tee match.
Just for fun, I put up a new M2 JHV. I won't go into the gruesome details here, please read my 'review' here in e.ham.
One thing about antenna gain claims: take them with a grain of salt. Somewhere on the WWW there is a graph of gain versus elements/boomlength. These are plotted against the famous NBS design, which is considered the standard. There is one thing that makes gain = boomlength. You can clean up the side lobes with interelement spacing and element lengths, but you don't 'make' power, but you can focus it into an ever more narrow main lobe. This comes at a cost of bandwidth, mechanical problems, and diminishing returns, etc. The CC Boomer (which is a very nice antenna) appears to be rated too high in reference to the other antennas in it's class. These are all Mfg. claims, of course. Some mfg. forget details such as 'gain over a dipole' or 'gain over isotropic', which 'looks' better, but is purely theoretical.
I will be more than glad to discuss this with you further, here or directly.
ron
N4UE