Re: Reply #6, KA7YAZ
Granted he wasn't answered properly, but his question was unclear to begin with--WAY unclear. For example, he stated the site was at a 4500 ft. elevation with nothing surrounding it LOWER than 2500 ft. Most looking at that would interpret it the wrong way--as I did--and think the site had a great advantage compared to the surrounding area. It turns out that it does not.
Heck, everyone expresses themselves poorly sometimes. As you said, give the poster a break and move on--and while you're at it, give the responders a break as well.