Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

donate to eham
   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: County limit of 35' lawful?  (Read 679 times)
NEVBEN
Member

Posts: 104




Ignore
« on: December 05, 2017, 12:38:44 PM »

I'm interested in opinions about a county ordinance limiting amateur antennas to 35' on parcels less than one acre.  For parcels larger than one acre, it is 75' and requires a major variance for higher.  I am primarily interested in the 35' limit.  The FCC's declaration (PRB-1) stops short of specifying a restriction on height limitations.  Now of course among hams I am sure I will receive unanimous agreement that 35' is too short, but what I want to know is whether this is restrictive enough to be in conflict with PRB-1.  For example, it would entirely preclude the use of a ZS6BKW antenna and that is a practical reason it is unreasonably restrictive, but practically speaking, is the FCC likely to be helpful?
Logged
KS2G
Member

Posts: 736




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2017, 01:22:25 PM »

... is the FCC likely to be helpful?

No, the FCC does not get involved in antenna disputes.

Unfortunately, PRB-1 cases must be adjudicated on a case-by-case basis.

No opinions you receive here will be much help.

You need to consult an attorney, preferably one skilled in the ways of local zoning and antenna precedents.

Check out the ARRL Volunteer Counsel Program:
http://www.arrl.org/volunteer-counsel-program
Logged
WB6BYU
Member

Posts: 17179




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2017, 01:42:59 PM »

Quote from: NEVBEN

...For example, it would entirely preclude the use of a ZS6BKW antenna...



Why?

There is no requirement that the ladder line for the ZS6BKW antenna run exactly vertical.
A simple installation is to let it hang down from the antenna then bend horizontally to run
across the yard to the house.   You can even install it at 5' high along wood fence if you
want, though you'll still want to keep the ladder line up off the ground.  And you can
always run ladder line directly to a tuner without worrying too much about the length.


So if you are going to choose an antenna to argue your case, at least it will help to pick one
that really doesn't fit within the 35' limit.

Logged
K6JH
Member

Posts: 404




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2017, 03:05:49 PM »

FYI, this doesn't help after the fact, but...

My town started to pass a 35ft ordnance. It turns out someone on staff knew about the 35ft CB FCC rule, so just put that into the initial draft. We managed to fill the council room with hams, red cross, etc. and got the rule changed to 75ft without a special variance. Still have to comply with building codes, etc.

After the fact, it'll be harder. There are antennas which can stay under 35ft. Certainly they are a compromise, and higher antennas open you up to other more effective types. But since the ordnance doesn't preclude amateur radio, I think it will be difficult and expensive to challenge.
Logged

73
Jim K6JH
NEVBEN
Member

Posts: 104




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2017, 05:52:51 PM »

... is the FCC likely to be helpful?

No, the FCC does not get involved in antenna disputes.

Unfortunately, PRB-1 cases must be adjudicated on a case-by-case basis.


Which one is it?  They do adjudicate or they don't?

Also, this isn't a dispute, but a question about whether an ordinance is contrary to PRB-1 or not.  Just to clarify, this ordinance is long established.

Based on the responses, my understanding is the 35' limit is likely to stand.  That's a pity because it contributes to making amateur radio something best suited only for the elite, which not only have the kilobuck transreceivers, but also at least an acre for their tower.  Sure, the little guy can use the club's repeater with his HT or play around with QRP, or heck even heat the ground as much as he wants with the full legal limit.
Logged
K5LXP
Member

Posts: 5333


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2017, 06:48:56 PM »

Quote from:  link=topic=118063.msg1037808#msg1037808 date=1512506324
I'm interested in opinions about a county ordinance limiting amateur antennas to 35' on parcels less than one acre.

In my experience, ordinances aren't subject to opinion.   :-)

What about the rest of the zoning?  I've seen where the height limit is stated but that's the permissive limit, i.e. no permit required.  But you can go higher with a permit or a variance.  That will be spelled out in the zoning documents. 

Doesn't mean it would be easy or cheap, but not impossible.


Mark K5LXP
Albuquerque, NM
Logged
KS2G
Member

Posts: 736




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2017, 07:49:54 PM »

... is the FCC likely to be helpful?

No, the FCC does not get involved in antenna disputes.

Unfortunately, PRB-1 cases must be adjudicated on a case-by-case basis.


Which one is it?  They do adjudicate or they don't?

Also, this isn't a dispute, but a question about whether an ordinance is contrary to PRB-1 or not.  Just to clarify, this ordinance is long established.

Based on the responses, my understanding is the 35' limit is likely to stand.  That's a pity because it contributes to making amateur radio something best suited only for the elite, which not only have the kilobuck transreceivers, but also at least an acre for their tower.  Sure, the little guy can use the club's repeater with his HT or play around with QRP, or heck even heat the ground as much as he wants with the full legal limit.

I guess I wasn't clear: I will try again.

No, you will not get any help from the FCC in determining whether the 35-foot height limit is in compliance with PRB-1.

The FCC does not make such determinations; they're made by courts when individuals file legal challenges to local restrictions.

And those decisions across the country are "all over the map".
There is no "magic number" as to what height-limit (or, for that matter, whether any height limit) complies with PRB-1.

The key language in PRB-1 is its requirement that local authorities provide "reasonable accommodation" for antenna structures, and that's open to considerably different interpretations, as discussed in this article: http://www.antennazoning.com/attachments/PRB1_Article.pdf 

As I said in my earlier post, no opinions you receive here (as to whether the 35-foot height limit in your location complies with PRB-1) will be much help.

You need to consult an attorney, preferably one skilled in the ways of local zoning and antenna precedents.

Check out the ARRL Volunteer Counsel Program:
http://www.arrl.org/volunteer-counsel-program



Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!